跨专业老年医学教师发展计划:顶点项目的障碍和促进因素探索。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-08-07 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2023.2243844
Kimberly Davis, Sarah A Marrs, Ishan C Williams, Kristin Zimmerman, Constance L Coogle, Edward F Ansello, Pamela L Parsons, Patricia W Slattum, Leland H Waters
{"title":"跨专业老年医学教师发展计划:顶点项目的障碍和促进因素探索。","authors":"Kimberly Davis, Sarah A Marrs, Ishan C Williams, Kristin Zimmerman, Constance L Coogle, Edward F Ansello, Pamela L Parsons, Patricia W Slattum, Leland H Waters","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2023.2243844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Faculty development programs (FDPs) are an effective, evidence-based method of promoting knowledge, skills and self-efficacy of faculty. However, implementation and sustainability of curricular capstone projects developed by faculty as part of these programs are rarely reported. Challenges to sustaining programmatic implementation of interprofessional FDP curricular content into academic and clinical settings over time were not found in peer-reviewed literature. To better understand the sustained impact of our geriatrics-focused FDP, we explored barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability of capstone projects designed by faculty Scholars in our FDP. Thematic analysis of virtual interviews with 17 Scholars revealed several key factors that impacted the implementation and Dynamic sustainability of curricular projects. Three major themes and sub-themes were identified: Project Implementation (Supportive Factors, Hindering Factors and Filling in Gaps in the Field); Pedagogical Development (Enhancement of Skills and Culture Change); and Sustainability Impact (Project Sustainability, Career Development and Passing the Torch). Results suggest it is important to ensure logistical support, dedicated time, and organizational or institutional support. Implementation of geriatrics-focused FDPs provides an evidence-based approach to sustainability. Further study of the ongoing barriers and facilitators to sustainability is encouraged.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"468-482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interprofessional geriatrics faculty development program: exploration of the barriers and facilitators of capstone projects.\",\"authors\":\"Kimberly Davis, Sarah A Marrs, Ishan C Williams, Kristin Zimmerman, Constance L Coogle, Edward F Ansello, Pamela L Parsons, Patricia W Slattum, Leland H Waters\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2023.2243844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Faculty development programs (FDPs) are an effective, evidence-based method of promoting knowledge, skills and self-efficacy of faculty. However, implementation and sustainability of curricular capstone projects developed by faculty as part of these programs are rarely reported. Challenges to sustaining programmatic implementation of interprofessional FDP curricular content into academic and clinical settings over time were not found in peer-reviewed literature. To better understand the sustained impact of our geriatrics-focused FDP, we explored barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability of capstone projects designed by faculty Scholars in our FDP. Thematic analysis of virtual interviews with 17 Scholars revealed several key factors that impacted the implementation and Dynamic sustainability of curricular projects. Three major themes and sub-themes were identified: Project Implementation (Supportive Factors, Hindering Factors and Filling in Gaps in the Field); Pedagogical Development (Enhancement of Skills and Culture Change); and Sustainability Impact (Project Sustainability, Career Development and Passing the Torch). Results suggest it is important to ensure logistical support, dedicated time, and organizational or institutional support. Implementation of geriatrics-focused FDPs provides an evidence-based approach to sustainability. Further study of the ongoing barriers and facilitators to sustainability is encouraged.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"468-482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2243844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2023.2243844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教师发展项目(FDPs)是促进教师知识、技能和自我效能的一种有效的、以证据为基础的方法。然而,作为这些计划的一部分,由教师开发的课程顶点项目的实施和可持续性却鲜有报道。在同行评议的文献中,也没有发现跨专业 FDP 课程内容在学术和临床环境中的持续实施所面临的挑战。为了更好地了解我们以老年医学为重点的 FDP 的持续影响,我们对 FDP 中教师学者设计的顶点项目的实施和可持续性的障碍和促进因素进行了探讨。通过对 17 位学者的虚拟访谈进行主题分析,我们发现了影响课程项目实施和动态可持续性的几个关键因素。我们确定了三个主要主题和次主题:项目实施(支持因素、阻碍因素和填补领域空白);教学发展(提高技能和文化变革);可持续性影响(项目可持续性、职业发展和薪火相传)。结果表明,确保后勤支持、专门时间和组织或机构支持非常重要。实施以老年医学为重点的家庭发展项目为可持续发展提供了一种循证方法。我们鼓励对可持续性的持续障碍和促进因素进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An interprofessional geriatrics faculty development program: exploration of the barriers and facilitators of capstone projects.

Faculty development programs (FDPs) are an effective, evidence-based method of promoting knowledge, skills and self-efficacy of faculty. However, implementation and sustainability of curricular capstone projects developed by faculty as part of these programs are rarely reported. Challenges to sustaining programmatic implementation of interprofessional FDP curricular content into academic and clinical settings over time were not found in peer-reviewed literature. To better understand the sustained impact of our geriatrics-focused FDP, we explored barriers and facilitators to implementation and sustainability of capstone projects designed by faculty Scholars in our FDP. Thematic analysis of virtual interviews with 17 Scholars revealed several key factors that impacted the implementation and Dynamic sustainability of curricular projects. Three major themes and sub-themes were identified: Project Implementation (Supportive Factors, Hindering Factors and Filling in Gaps in the Field); Pedagogical Development (Enhancement of Skills and Culture Change); and Sustainability Impact (Project Sustainability, Career Development and Passing the Torch). Results suggest it is important to ensure logistical support, dedicated time, and organizational or institutional support. Implementation of geriatrics-focused FDPs provides an evidence-based approach to sustainability. Further study of the ongoing barriers and facilitators to sustainability is encouraged.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Transforming perspectives on aging: educational, professional, and research innovations to address ageism. Geriatrics Connect: countering ageism in first-year medical students with longitudinal telephonic relationships. Developing a community advisory board to combat ageism: process and preliminary outcomes. Emeriti professors' perceptions: qualitative research exploring involvement in university activities. Factors related to benevolent and hostile ageism among paramedical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1