顶级学术医学中心眼科教师从其培训机构内部聘用的比率:横断面研究。

Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017) Pub Date : 2023-07-31 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771377
Emanuelle M Rizk, Jiangxia Wang, Xiyu Zhao, Brittany Tsou, Beruk E Metiku, Katie Cho, Pranav Samineni, Jayanth Sridhar, Fasika A Woreta
{"title":"顶级学术医学中心眼科教师从其培训机构内部聘用的比率:横断面研究。","authors":"Emanuelle M Rizk, Jiangxia Wang, Xiyu Zhao, Brittany Tsou, Beruk E Metiku, Katie Cho, Pranav Samineni, Jayanth Sridhar, Fasika A Woreta","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. <b>Objective</b>  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. <b>Methods</b>  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using <i>t</i> -tests or Mann-Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. <b>Results</b>  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001, <i>p</i>  < 0.001, and <i>p</i>  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( <i>p</i>  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12-2.96). <b>Conclusions</b>  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"15 2","pages":"e154-e161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/e4/10-1055-s-0043-1771377.PMC10411073.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Emanuelle M Rizk, Jiangxia Wang, Xiyu Zhao, Brittany Tsou, Beruk E Metiku, Katie Cho, Pranav Samineni, Jayanth Sridhar, Fasika A Woreta\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1771377\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. <b>Objective</b>  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. <b>Methods</b>  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using <i>t</i> -tests or Mann-Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. <b>Results</b>  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( <i>p</i>  < 0.001, <i>p</i>  < 0.001, and <i>p</i>  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( <i>p</i>  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12-2.96). <b>Conclusions</b>  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"e154-e161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/e4/10-1055-s-0043-1771377.PMC10411073.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771377\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 在整个研究生教育过程中,受训者需要衡量培训地点对未来执业机构的影响。目的 我们评估了学术机构内部聘用来自同一培训机构的眼科教师的比率。方法 这是一项横断面研究。我们纳入了 2021 年《美国新闻与世界报道》中列出的 13 所一流院校的 1246 名临床眼科教师。研究对象包括主讲教师、名誉教师、兼职教师和附属教师。公开信息来自机构网站和其他在线资源。统计分析采用 t 检验或曼-惠特尼检验、卡方检验或费雪精确检验以及多变量逻辑回归。测量的主要结果是内部聘用,即在当前机构完成住院医师和/或研究员培训的教师。结果 47.3%的教职员工是内部聘用的,他们在同一所院校完成了住院医师或研究员培训。在外部培训的教职员工中,27.7%在排名前 13 位的其他院校完成了住院医师培训,56.0%在其他院校完成了研究员培训。内部聘用人员更经常接受研究员培训,发表过更多的论文,并且在较小的科室工作(分别为 p p = 0.002)。更多的内部聘用人员担任领导职务(P = 0.012)。在中西部或西部执业、住院医师毕业年限较长的教师成为内部聘用人员的可能性较低(几率比 [OR],0.29,95% 置信区间 [CI],0.18-0.48;OR,0.49,95% 置信区间 [CI],0.31-0.78;OR,0.98,95% 置信区间 [CI],0.97-0.99)。获得美国国立卫生研究院非 R01 基金资助的教师更有可能是内部聘用(OR,1.82,95% CI:1.12-2.96)。结论 培训机构是决定实习机构的关键。这些结果可能有利于学员在选择培训项目时加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rates of Internal Hiring of Ophthalmology Faculty from their Institution of Training at Top Academic Medical Centers: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background  Throughout graduate and postgraduate education, trainees need to gauge the impact of training location on future institutions of practice. Objective  We assessed rates of internal hiring of ophthalmology faculty at academic institutions from their same institution of training. Methods  This was a cross-sectional study. We included 1,246 clinical ophthalmology faculty at the 13 top-ranked institutions listed in the 2021 U.S. News and World Report. Primary, emeritus, adjunct, and affiliate faculty were included. Publicly available information was collected from institutional websites and other online sources. Statistical analyses were conducted using t -tests or Mann-Whitney tests, chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests, and multivariate logistic regression. The main outcome measured was internal hires, defined as faculty who had completed residency and/or fellowship training at their current institution. Results  In total, 47.3% of faculty were internal hires who completed residency or fellowship at the same institution. Among externally trained faculty, 27.7% completed residency and 56.0% completed fellowship at another top 13 programs. Internal hires were more frequently fellowship-trained, had a greater number of publications, and practiced in smaller departments ( p  < 0.001, p  < 0.001, and p  = 0.002, respectively). A greater proportion of internal hires held leadership positions ( p  = 0.012). Faculty practicing in the Midwest or West and with more years since residency graduation were less likely (odds ratio [OR], 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18-0.48; OR, 0.49, 95% CI, 0.31-0.78; OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.97-0.99, respectively) to be internal hires. Faculty with non-R01 National Institutes of Health funding were more likely to be internal hires (OR, 1.82, 95% CI: 1.12-2.96). Conclusions  Training institution is key to determining the institution of practice. These results may be beneficial for trainees to consider when selecting a training program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data. Self-Reported Perceptions of Preparedness among Incoming Ophthalmology Residents. The Matthew Effect: Prevalence of Doctor and Physician Parents among Ophthalmology Applicants. Gender Representation on North American Ophthalmology Societies' Governance Boards. The Big Data Gap: Asymmetric Information in the Ophthalmology Residency Match Process and the Argument for Transparent Residency Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1