正颌手术对唇腭裂患者呼吸的影响:巴西一家三甲医院 20 年的经验。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1177/10556656221145311
Déborah Rocha Seixas, Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade, Renata Paciello Yamashita, Andressa Sharllene Carneiro da Silva, Bruna Mara Adorno Marmontel Araújo, Sergio Éberson da Silva Maia, Ana Paula Fukushiro
{"title":"正颌手术对唇腭裂患者呼吸的影响:巴西一家三甲医院 20 年的经验。","authors":"Déborah Rocha Seixas, Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade, Renata Paciello Yamashita, Andressa Sharllene Carneiro da Silva, Bruna Mara Adorno Marmontel Araújo, Sergio Éberson da Silva Maia, Ana Paula Fukushiro","doi":"10.1177/10556656221145311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify the effect of orthognathic surgery (OS) on nasal dimensions and its correlation with respiratory symptoms in patients operated on over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary level craniofacial hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>535 patients with CLP previously repaired, without syndromes, age over 18, who performed OS between 2000 and 2019 and rhinomanometric evaluation pre and post OS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Maxillary advancement isolated and combined with turbinectomy and/or mandibular osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Minimum nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) assessed by posterior (PR) and anterior rhinomanometry (AR), nasopharyngeal cross-sectional area (NCSA) verified by modified AR, and self-perceived respiratory symptoms through a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After OS, there was a significant increase in CSA assessed by PR (p < .001) and AR (p < .001), while there was no significant difference in NCSA (p = 0.319). Regarding respiratory symptoms after OS, 26.3% showed improvement in nasal obstruction, 28.5% in oronasal breathing, 18.5% in snoring, and 5.2% in respiratory obstruction during sleep. However, a weak correlation between increased CSA and improvement of symptoms was observed. In the first decade, lower values of CSA (p < .001) and NCSA (p < .001) were observed compared to the second decade. Both periods showed a significant increase in CSA (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal dimensions and breathing symptoms were improved by OS when combined with turbinectomy. Comparing the results of patients operated on between two different decades, patients had more favorable conditions for breathing in the most recent decade of care. However, this was not statistically correlated with the improvement in patient symptoms in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Orthognathic Surgery on Breathing in Patients with Cleft lip and Palate: 20-Year Experience at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.\",\"authors\":\"Déborah Rocha Seixas, Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade, Renata Paciello Yamashita, Andressa Sharllene Carneiro da Silva, Bruna Mara Adorno Marmontel Araújo, Sergio Éberson da Silva Maia, Ana Paula Fukushiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656221145311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To verify the effect of orthognathic surgery (OS) on nasal dimensions and its correlation with respiratory symptoms in patients operated on over the past 20 years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary level craniofacial hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>535 patients with CLP previously repaired, without syndromes, age over 18, who performed OS between 2000 and 2019 and rhinomanometric evaluation pre and post OS.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Maxillary advancement isolated and combined with turbinectomy and/or mandibular osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Minimum nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) assessed by posterior (PR) and anterior rhinomanometry (AR), nasopharyngeal cross-sectional area (NCSA) verified by modified AR, and self-perceived respiratory symptoms through a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After OS, there was a significant increase in CSA assessed by PR (p < .001) and AR (p < .001), while there was no significant difference in NCSA (p = 0.319). Regarding respiratory symptoms after OS, 26.3% showed improvement in nasal obstruction, 28.5% in oronasal breathing, 18.5% in snoring, and 5.2% in respiratory obstruction during sleep. However, a weak correlation between increased CSA and improvement of symptoms was observed. In the first decade, lower values of CSA (p < .001) and NCSA (p < .001) were observed compared to the second decade. Both periods showed a significant increase in CSA (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nasal dimensions and breathing symptoms were improved by OS when combined with turbinectomy. Comparing the results of patients operated on between two different decades, patients had more favorable conditions for breathing in the most recent decade of care. However, this was not statistically correlated with the improvement in patient symptoms in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221145311\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221145311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证正颌手术(OS)对鼻腔尺寸的影响及其与呼吸道症状的相关性:验证正颌手术(OS)对鼻腔尺寸的影响及其与呼吸道症状的相关性:设计:回顾性研究:地点:三级颅颌面医院:535名曾接受过CLP修复的患者,无综合征,年龄在18岁以上,在2000年至2019年期间接受过OS手术,并在OS手术前后进行了鼻测量评估:主要结果测量指标:最小鼻腔横截面积(0.5×0.5×0.5):通过后方(PR)和前方鼻测量(AR)评估最小鼻横截面积(CSA),通过改良的AR验证鼻咽横截面积(NCSA),以及通过问卷调查自我感觉的呼吸道症状:OS 后,通过 PR 评估的鼻咽横截面积明显增加(p 结论:OS 后,鼻咽横截面积和呼吸症状明显改善:在结合涡轮切除术的情况下,OS 可改善鼻腔尺寸和呼吸症状。比较两个不同年代接受手术的患者的结果,最近十年接受治疗的患者呼吸条件更佳。然而,在本研究中,这与患者症状的改善并无统计学关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Orthognathic Surgery on Breathing in Patients with Cleft lip and Palate: 20-Year Experience at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

Objective: To verify the effect of orthognathic surgery (OS) on nasal dimensions and its correlation with respiratory symptoms in patients operated on over the past 20 years.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary level craniofacial hospital.

Participants: 535 patients with CLP previously repaired, without syndromes, age over 18, who performed OS between 2000 and 2019 and rhinomanometric evaluation pre and post OS.

Interventions: Maxillary advancement isolated and combined with turbinectomy and/or mandibular osteotomy.

Main outcome measures: Minimum nasal cross-sectional area (CSA) assessed by posterior (PR) and anterior rhinomanometry (AR), nasopharyngeal cross-sectional area (NCSA) verified by modified AR, and self-perceived respiratory symptoms through a questionnaire.

Results: After OS, there was a significant increase in CSA assessed by PR (p < .001) and AR (p < .001), while there was no significant difference in NCSA (p = 0.319). Regarding respiratory symptoms after OS, 26.3% showed improvement in nasal obstruction, 28.5% in oronasal breathing, 18.5% in snoring, and 5.2% in respiratory obstruction during sleep. However, a weak correlation between increased CSA and improvement of symptoms was observed. In the first decade, lower values of CSA (p < .001) and NCSA (p < .001) were observed compared to the second decade. Both periods showed a significant increase in CSA (p < .001).

Conclusions: Nasal dimensions and breathing symptoms were improved by OS when combined with turbinectomy. Comparing the results of patients operated on between two different decades, patients had more favorable conditions for breathing in the most recent decade of care. However, this was not statistically correlated with the improvement in patient symptoms in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative Daycare as a Safe and Cost-Effective Option for Secondary Alveolar Bone Graft (SABG) Surgery: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study. Prediction of Early Postoperative Pain in Infants Undergoing Primary Cleft Palate Repair. Jaw Surgery Workshop: Patient Preparation for Orthognathic Surgery. Prognosis of Maxillary Central Incisors in Patients with Bilateral Cleft Lip/Palate. Single-cell Transcriptome Landscape of DNA Methylome Regulators Associated with Orofacial Clefts in the Mouse Dental Pulp.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1