前瞻性加拿大胃食管癌数据库:我们学到了什么?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.005122
Kieran Purich, Daniel Skubleny, Sunita Ghosh, Eric L R Bédard, Kenneth C Stewart, Scott T Johnson, Erika Haase, Michael McCall, Dan Schiller
{"title":"前瞻性加拿大胃食管癌数据库:我们学到了什么?","authors":"Kieran Purich,&nbsp;Daniel Skubleny,&nbsp;Sunita Ghosh,&nbsp;Eric L R Bédard,&nbsp;Kenneth C Stewart,&nbsp;Scott T Johnson,&nbsp;Erika Haase,&nbsp;Michael McCall,&nbsp;Dan Schiller","doi":"10.1503/cjs.005122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimal literature exists on outcomes for Canadian patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The objective of our study was to establish a prospective clinical database to evaluate demographic characteristics, presentation and outcomes of patients with GEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with GEA were recruited from Jan. 30, 2017, to Aug. 30, 2020. Data collected included demographic characteristics, presentation, treatment and survival. A multivariable model for overall survival in patients treated with curative intent was created using sex, lymph node status, resection margin status, age and tumour location as variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), 70% of patients were male and 26% were born outside of Canada. Median follow-up time was 14.5 (IQR 8.0-31.0) months. Following staging computed tomography scanning, 88% of patients were deemed to have potentially resectable disease. Eighty-one (76%) received staging laparoscopy and 74 (61%) were treated with curativeintent surgery. Forty-six (62%) patients had nodal metastases. The median number of nodes harvested was 22 (IQR 18-30). The R0 resection margin rate was 82%. The 3-year overall survival for patients who received curative-intent treatment was 63% and 38% for all patients. On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.88, <i>p</i> = 0.01), positive nodal status (HR 3.58, <i>p</i> = 0.02), positive margins (HR 3.11, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and tumour location (HR 3.00, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were associated with decreased overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many of the patients with GEA in this study presented with advanced disease, and only 61% were offered curative-intent surgery. A prospective multicentre national GEA database is now being established.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/a7/066E422.PMC10414783.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective Canadian gastroesophageal cancer database: What have we learned?\",\"authors\":\"Kieran Purich,&nbsp;Daniel Skubleny,&nbsp;Sunita Ghosh,&nbsp;Eric L R Bédard,&nbsp;Kenneth C Stewart,&nbsp;Scott T Johnson,&nbsp;Erika Haase,&nbsp;Michael McCall,&nbsp;Dan Schiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cjs.005122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimal literature exists on outcomes for Canadian patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The objective of our study was to establish a prospective clinical database to evaluate demographic characteristics, presentation and outcomes of patients with GEA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with GEA were recruited from Jan. 30, 2017, to Aug. 30, 2020. Data collected included demographic characteristics, presentation, treatment and survival. A multivariable model for overall survival in patients treated with curative intent was created using sex, lymph node status, resection margin status, age and tumour location as variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 122 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), 70% of patients were male and 26% were born outside of Canada. Median follow-up time was 14.5 (IQR 8.0-31.0) months. Following staging computed tomography scanning, 88% of patients were deemed to have potentially resectable disease. Eighty-one (76%) received staging laparoscopy and 74 (61%) were treated with curativeintent surgery. Forty-six (62%) patients had nodal metastases. The median number of nodes harvested was 22 (IQR 18-30). The R0 resection margin rate was 82%. The 3-year overall survival for patients who received curative-intent treatment was 63% and 38% for all patients. On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.88, <i>p</i> = 0.01), positive nodal status (HR 3.58, <i>p</i> = 0.02), positive margins (HR 3.11, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and tumour location (HR 3.00, <i>p</i> = 0.03) were associated with decreased overall survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many of the patients with GEA in this study presented with advanced disease, and only 61% were offered curative-intent surgery. A prospective multicentre national GEA database is now being established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fa/a7/066E422.PMC10414783.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005122\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.005122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于加拿大胃食管腺癌(GEA)患者预后的文献很少。本研究的目的是建立一个前瞻性临床数据库,以评估GEA患者的人口学特征、表现和预后。方法:招募2017年1月30日至2020年8月30日诊断为GEA的患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学特征、表现、治疗和生存率。以性别、淋巴结状态、切除边缘状态、年龄和肿瘤位置为变量,建立了以治愈为目的的患者总生存率的多变量模型。结果:共纳入122例胃或胃食管交界处腺癌患者。中位年龄为65岁(四分位数范围[IQR] 59-74), 70%的患者为男性,26%的患者出生在加拿大以外。中位随访时间为14.5个月(IQR 8.0 ~ 31.0)。分期计算机断层扫描后,88%的患者被认为有潜在的可切除的疾病。81例(76%)接受了分期腹腔镜检查,74例(61%)接受了治愈性手术治疗。46例(62%)患者有淋巴结转移。中位数为22个(IQR 18-30)。R0切缘率为82%。接受治疗意图治疗的患者3年总生存率为63%,所有患者为38%。在多变量分析中,女性(风险比[HR] 3.88, p = 0.01)、阳性淋巴结状态(HR 3.58, p = 0.02)、阳性边缘(HR 3.11, p = 0.03)和肿瘤位置(HR 3.00, p = 0.03)与总生存率降低相关。结论:本研究中许多GEA患者表现为晚期疾病,只有61%的患者接受了治疗目的手术。目前正在建立一个未来的多中心国家全球环境评估数据库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A prospective Canadian gastroesophageal cancer database: What have we learned?

Background: Minimal literature exists on outcomes for Canadian patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). The objective of our study was to establish a prospective clinical database to evaluate demographic characteristics, presentation and outcomes of patients with GEA.

Methods: Patients diagnosed with GEA were recruited from Jan. 30, 2017, to Aug. 30, 2020. Data collected included demographic characteristics, presentation, treatment and survival. A multivariable model for overall survival in patients treated with curative intent was created using sex, lymph node status, resection margin status, age and tumour location as variables.

Results: A total of 122 patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were included. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR] 59-74), 70% of patients were male and 26% were born outside of Canada. Median follow-up time was 14.5 (IQR 8.0-31.0) months. Following staging computed tomography scanning, 88% of patients were deemed to have potentially resectable disease. Eighty-one (76%) received staging laparoscopy and 74 (61%) were treated with curativeintent surgery. Forty-six (62%) patients had nodal metastases. The median number of nodes harvested was 22 (IQR 18-30). The R0 resection margin rate was 82%. The 3-year overall survival for patients who received curative-intent treatment was 63% and 38% for all patients. On multivariable analysis, female sex (hazard ratio [HR] 3.88, p = 0.01), positive nodal status (HR 3.58, p = 0.02), positive margins (HR 3.11, p = 0.03) and tumour location (HR 3.00, p = 0.03) were associated with decreased overall survival.

Conclusion: Many of the patients with GEA in this study presented with advanced disease, and only 61% were offered curative-intent surgery. A prospective multicentre national GEA database is now being established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
期刊最新文献
Reasons for 90-day emergency department visits after primary knee arthroplasty. Re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer: an Albertan perspective. Perceptions of readiness for independent practice among graduating orthopedic surgery residents in Ontario in the last 30 years. Injury and violence in the context of sustainable development: The first Bethune Round Table in Africa, Bethune Round Table 2024, Conference on Global Surgery, May 16-18, 2024, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Difficult legal precedent established for rural surgical competency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1