在初次全髋关节置换术中,腰丛神经阻滞比关节周围浸润提供更好的镇痛管理。比较、前瞻性和单盲临床试验]。

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2022-03-01
S L Iglesias, L Gentile, P López, I Pioli, M Mangupli, J Gómez, B L Allende
{"title":"在初次全髋关节置换术中,腰丛神经阻滞比关节周围浸润提供更好的镇痛管理。比较、前瞻性和单盲临床试验]。","authors":"S L Iglesias,&nbsp;L Gentile,&nbsp;P López,&nbsp;I Pioli,&nbsp;M Mangupli,&nbsp;J Gómez,&nbsp;B L Allende","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>joint replacement is a highly effective intervention that significantly improves the patient's quality of life, relieves symptoms, restores joint function, and improves mobility and independence. The optimal pain control after total hip replacement has become an important goal of postoperative management. The purpose of this paper is to compare periarticular infiltration (PAI) and lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) for the management of post-operative pain in primary total hip arthroplasty because we believe that LPNB provides better analgesic management and lower opioid consumption. We evaluated the opioid usage during hospitalization and the complications derived from either technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>we randomized 45 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty between January 2019 and January 2020. Two groups were evaluated based on the association of PAI or LPNB. Both as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 45 patients were evaluated (22 PAI group, 23 LPNB group). Block group required less opioid administration (p = 0.069). Most of the patients in both groups reported mild/moderate pain. The LPNB group had lower pain scale with physiotherapy. We did not have complications derived from either technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty provides better pain management and reduced opioid consumption compared to PAI. The performance of this technique does not delay the beginning of physiotherapy and there were not any issues with the patient's recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":7081,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"36 2","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Lumbar plexus nerve block provides better analgesic management than periarticular infiltration in primary total hip arthroplasty. Comparative, prospective, and single-blind clinical trial].\",\"authors\":\"S L Iglesias,&nbsp;L Gentile,&nbsp;P López,&nbsp;I Pioli,&nbsp;M Mangupli,&nbsp;J Gómez,&nbsp;B L Allende\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>joint replacement is a highly effective intervention that significantly improves the patient's quality of life, relieves symptoms, restores joint function, and improves mobility and independence. The optimal pain control after total hip replacement has become an important goal of postoperative management. The purpose of this paper is to compare periarticular infiltration (PAI) and lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) for the management of post-operative pain in primary total hip arthroplasty because we believe that LPNB provides better analgesic management and lower opioid consumption. We evaluated the opioid usage during hospitalization and the complications derived from either technique.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>we randomized 45 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty between January 2019 and January 2020. Two groups were evaluated based on the association of PAI or LPNB. Both as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>a total of 45 patients were evaluated (22 PAI group, 23 LPNB group). Block group required less opioid administration (p = 0.069). Most of the patients in both groups reported mild/moderate pain. The LPNB group had lower pain scale with physiotherapy. We did not have complications derived from either technique.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty provides better pain management and reduced opioid consumption compared to PAI. The performance of this technique does not delay the beginning of physiotherapy and there were not any issues with the patient's recovery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7081,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"79-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta ortopedica mexicana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关节置换术是一种非常有效的干预措施,可显著改善患者的生活质量,缓解症状,恢复关节功能,提高活动能力和独立性。全髋关节置换术后疼痛的最佳控制已成为术后管理的重要目标。本文的目的是比较关节周围浸润(PAI)和腰丛神经阻滞(LPNB)对原发性全髋关节置换术术后疼痛的管理,因为我们认为LPNB提供更好的镇痛管理和更低的阿片类药物消耗。我们评估了住院期间阿片类药物的使用以及两种技术引起的并发症。材料和方法:我们随机选择了45名在2019年1月至2020年1月期间接受了选择性全髋关节置换术的患者。根据PAI或LPNB的相关性对两组进行评估。两者都是多模式镇痛方案的一部分。结果:共评估45例患者(PAI组22例,LPNB组23例)。阻断组所需阿片类药物较少(p = 0.069)。两组中大多数患者均报告轻度/中度疼痛。LPNB组经物理治疗后疼痛评分较低。两种技术均未引起并发症。结论:与PAI相比,腰丛神经阻滞(LPNB)在全髋关节置换术患者中提供了更好的疼痛管理和减少阿片类药物消耗。这种技术的性能不会延迟物理治疗的开始,也没有任何问题与病人的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Lumbar plexus nerve block provides better analgesic management than periarticular infiltration in primary total hip arthroplasty. Comparative, prospective, and single-blind clinical trial].

Introduction: joint replacement is a highly effective intervention that significantly improves the patient's quality of life, relieves symptoms, restores joint function, and improves mobility and independence. The optimal pain control after total hip replacement has become an important goal of postoperative management. The purpose of this paper is to compare periarticular infiltration (PAI) and lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) for the management of post-operative pain in primary total hip arthroplasty because we believe that LPNB provides better analgesic management and lower opioid consumption. We evaluated the opioid usage during hospitalization and the complications derived from either technique.

Material and methods: we randomized 45 patients who underwent elective total hip arthroplasty between January 2019 and January 2020. Two groups were evaluated based on the association of PAI or LPNB. Both as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen.

Results: a total of 45 patients were evaluated (22 PAI group, 23 LPNB group). Block group required less opioid administration (p = 0.069). Most of the patients in both groups reported mild/moderate pain. The LPNB group had lower pain scale with physiotherapy. We did not have complications derived from either technique.

Conclusion: lumbar plexus nerve block (LPNB) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty provides better pain management and reduced opioid consumption compared to PAI. The performance of this technique does not delay the beginning of physiotherapy and there were not any issues with the patient's recovery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Functional results after shoulder hemiarthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture: experience in our center]. [Impact of the nail diameter on consolidation of tibial diaphyseal fractures. Retrospective analysis of 96 patients]. Evaluation and management of osteochondral lesions of the talus in skeletally immature patients. What is the degree of variability in formal training for pediatric orthopedic surgeons performing scoliosis surgery? [Surgical wound dehiscence and exposed hardware. Infection foretold?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1