富有同情心的社区:如何评估他们的利益?不同国家之间合作研究的协议。

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524231170885
Valentina González-Jaramillo, Alicia Krikorian, Vilma Tripodoro, Margarita Jorge, Sofia C Zambrano, Francy López, Maria Clara Vélez, Tatiana Noguera, Sebastián Orellana, Silvina Montilla, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Steffen Eychmüller
{"title":"富有同情心的社区:如何评估他们的利益?不同国家之间合作研究的协议。","authors":"Valentina González-Jaramillo,&nbsp;Alicia Krikorian,&nbsp;Vilma Tripodoro,&nbsp;Margarita Jorge,&nbsp;Sofia C Zambrano,&nbsp;Francy López,&nbsp;Maria Clara Vélez,&nbsp;Tatiana Noguera,&nbsp;Sebastián Orellana,&nbsp;Silvina Montilla,&nbsp;Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero,&nbsp;Steffen Eychmüller","doi":"10.1177/26323524231170885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/13/10.1177_26323524231170885.PMC10176585.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compassionate communities: How to assess their benefit? A protocol of a collaborative study between different countries.\",\"authors\":\"Valentina González-Jaramillo,&nbsp;Alicia Krikorian,&nbsp;Vilma Tripodoro,&nbsp;Margarita Jorge,&nbsp;Sofia C Zambrano,&nbsp;Francy López,&nbsp;Maria Clara Vélez,&nbsp;Tatiana Noguera,&nbsp;Sebastián Orellana,&nbsp;Silvina Montilla,&nbsp;Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero,&nbsp;Steffen Eychmüller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26323524231170885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/df/13/10.1177_26323524231170885.PMC10176585.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Care and Social Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231170885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231170885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社区和地方政府投入了大量的时间、金钱、精力和工作。然而,目前尚不清楚CCs是否达到了预期的效果,因此,继续实施这些举措的价值是未知的,需要一个评估CCs的模型来解决这个问题。目标:确定一组核心成果或利益,以评估共同承诺的影响。设计:多方法研究涉及三个不同国家的社区(阿根廷、哥伦比亚和瑞士)。方法与分析:为了确定核心结果集,这是开发CC评估模型的第一步,将遵循五个阶段:在线会议、文献综述、实地调查、德尔菲调查和社会转移。我们将让伯尔尼、布宜诺斯艾利斯和麦德林当地社区的成员在三个不同的层面上参与进来:(1)公民(如患者、护理人员和家庭成员),(2)参与项目实施的组织和机构(如卫生保健组织、教会、非政府组织和学校),以及(3)政治和政府部门。伦理:本研究将遵循现有的国际法规和指导,如《赫尔辛基宣言》。Pallium Latin America的伦理委员会和Bern州的伦理委员会认为我们的申请不需要批准。伯尔尼和布宜诺斯艾利斯的伦理审批正在进行中。宗座玻利瓦尔大学伦理委员会批准了这项协议。讨论:我们期望这个项目将有助于弥合关于可衡量的共同承诺影响的知识差距,并促进更多的共同承诺发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Compassionate communities: How to assess their benefit? A protocol of a collaborative study between different countries.

Background: Communities and local governments invest in compassionate communities (CCs) a great deal of time, money, effort, and work. However, it is not known whether the CCs are having the effect they are expected to have, so the value of continuing with these initiatives is unknown, and there is a need for a model for evaluating CCs to solve the question.

Objectives: To identify a set of core outcomes or benefits that should be measured to assess the impact of the CCs.

Design: Multiple-methods study involving three communities, each in a different country (Argentina, Colombia, and Switzerland).

Methods and analysis: To identifying the set of core outcomes, which is the first step in developing the CC evaluation model, five phases will follow: online meetings, literature review, fieldwork, Delphi survey, and social transfer. We will involve members of the local communities of Bern, Buenos Aires, and Medellin at three different levels: (1) citizens (e.g. patients, caregivers, and family members), (2) organizations and institutions involved in the program implementation (e.g. health care organizations, churches, non-governmental organizations, and schools), and (3) political and governmental sectors.

Ethics: The study will be conducted following existing international regulations and guidance such as the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of Pallium Latin America and the ethics committee of the canton of Bern considered our application exempt from the need for approval. Ethics approval in Bern and Buenos Aires is in the process of being obtained. The ethics committee of the Pontifical Bolivarian University approved this protocol.

Discussion: We expect that this project will help bridge the gap in knowledge regarding the measurable impact of the CCs and enhance more CC development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering timely integrated palliative care in nursing homes through critical companionship: experiences from a Padi-Palli interventional study in France. Experience or perception: What healthcare providers need when using the Utrecht Symptom Diary-4 Dimensional, a mixed-methods study. Willingness to be present throughout patient death via medical aid in dying in a national sample of interdisciplinary US hospice clinicians: a content analysis of rationales. Adapting, implementing and evaluating a navigation intervention for older people with cancer and their family caregivers in six countries in Europe: the Horizon Europe-funded EU NAVIGATE project. Understanding end-of-life doula care provision: reporting on the design of a bereavement survey to evaluate doula support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1