集群维持经颅磁刺激(CM-TMS)的一百个课程——一项临床审计研究。

Q3 Medicine Psychopharmacology bulletin Pub Date : 2022-10-27
Saxby Pridmore, Jeremy O'Reilly, Ahmed Naguy, Renee Morey, Yvonne Turnier-Shea, Marzena Rybak
{"title":"集群维持经颅磁刺激(CM-TMS)的一百个课程——一项临床审计研究。","authors":"Saxby Pridmore,&nbsp;Jeremy O'Reilly,&nbsp;Ahmed Naguy,&nbsp;Renee Morey,&nbsp;Yvonne Turnier-Shea,&nbsp;Marzena Rybak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10<sup>-24</sup>), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10<sup>-25</sup>). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.</p>","PeriodicalId":21069,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","volume":"52 4","pages":"61-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Hundred Courses of Cluster Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CM TMS)-A Clinical Audit Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saxby Pridmore,&nbsp;Jeremy O'Reilly,&nbsp;Ahmed Naguy,&nbsp;Renee Morey,&nbsp;Yvonne Turnier-Shea,&nbsp;Marzena Rybak\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10<sup>-24</sup>), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10<sup>-25</sup>). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"volume\":\"52 4\",\"pages\":\"61-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9611800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychopharmacology bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发的重度抑郁障碍(MDD)易复发。集群维持(CM)TMS是在2.5-5天内进行的5次治疗的疗程,分为每月或更长的非治疗期。我们的目的是描述100个CM TMS疗程的结果。方法:这是一项质量保证/临床审计研究。我们研究了为私立医院住院患者提供的连续CM TMS课程。使用汉密尔顿抑郁六项评分(HAMD6)和临床整体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)量表对情绪进行评分(入院和出院时)。我们还应用了最近的STAR*D标准,该标准旨在衡量预计会影响患者功能的“临床变化”[16]。结果:对于总样本,使用HAMD6,83%的疗程在入院时出现复发或部分复发,81%的疗程在出院时出现缓解。在入院时HAMD6复发的46个疗程中,74%的疗程在出院时病情缓解。在100个疗程中,HAMD6出院分数显著低于入院分数(p=2.0×10-24),CGI-S分数(p=1.8×10-25)也是如此。对于入院时复发或部分复发的患者,使用STAR*D标准,CM TMS在82%的病例中提供的“临床意义”最小的结果。结论:对于入院时复发或部分复发的疗程,CM-TMS在出院时转化率超过70%。它使HAMD6和CGI-S评分在统计学上显著降低,并且使用STAR*D标准,至少广泛证明了“有临床意义”的变化。这一证据表明,CM TMS应该很容易用于复发性MDD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One Hundred Courses of Cluster Maintenance Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (CM TMS)-A Clinical Audit Study.

Objective: Major depressive disorder (MDD) which comes to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is prone to relapse. Cluster maintenance (CM) TMS is courses of 5 treatments delivered over 2.5-5 days, separated by monthly or greater non-treatment periods. Our aim was to characterize the outcomes of 100 courses of CM TMS.

Method: This was a Quality Assurance/Clinical Audit study. We studied consecutive CM TMS courses provided to private hospital inpatients. Mood was rated (on admission and discharge) using the six-item Hamilton depression rating (HAMD6) and the Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) scales. We also applied recent STAR*D criteria which are designed to measure the 'clinical change' expected to impact patient function [16].

Results: For the total sample, using the HAMD6, 83% of courses featured relapse or partial relapse on admission, and 81% featured remission on discharge. Of 46 courses featuring HAMD6 relapse on admission, 74% featured remission on discharge. For the 100 courses the HAMD6 discharge scores were significantly lower than the admission scores (p = 2.0 × 10-24), as were the CGI-S scores (p = 1.8 × 10-25). Using STAR*D criteria for people in relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS provided least a 'clinically meaningful' outcome in 82% of the cases.

Conclusion: For courses featuring relapse or partial relapse on admission, CM TMS converted greater than 70% to remission at discharge. It produced statistically significant reductions in HAMD6 and CGI-S scores, and using STAR*D criteria, at least 'clinically meaningful' change was extensively demonstrated. This evidence indicates CM TMS should be readily available to people living with relapsing MDD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychopharmacology bulletin
Psychopharmacology bulletin PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Related to Duloxetine-Atomoxetine Combination in an Adolescent with ADHD and Comorbid GAD. On the Origins of MAOI Misconceptions: Reaffirming their Role in Melancholic Depression. Alzheimer's and Dementia Guidelines and Tables. Captagone & Morbid Jealousy. Are Standardized Tests Sensitive to Early Cognitive Change in Parkinson's Disease?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1