利用固相细胞仪对细胞制剂、培养基和缓冲液进行快速无菌检测的方法。

Mahsa Mohammadi, Aline Bauer, David Roesti, Hans-Joachim Anders
{"title":"利用固相细胞仪对细胞制剂、培养基和缓冲液进行快速无菌检测的方法。","authors":"Mahsa Mohammadi, Aline Bauer, David Roesti, Hans-Joachim Anders","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we demonstrate a rapid sterility testing method for non-filterable cell-based preparations and its in-process control media/buffers. The selected rapid sterility test (RST) in this work is based on the ScanRDI<sup>®</sup> system, which detects fluorescently labeled microorganisms with solid-phase cytometry. ScanRDI<sup>®</sup> has been chosen due to its sensitivity for detecting viable microorganisms down to one microbial cell with a shorter time to detection compared with the compendial sterility test (CST) method. The RST was validated for a CAR-T cell-therapy product with 4 days of time to detection (TTD) and evaluated for in-process control of media/buffers with real-time detection method success according to USP <1223>, Ph. Eur. 5.1.6, and PDA Technical Report No. 33. The validation parameters included limit of detection and equivalence in routine operations, specificity, robustness, ruggedness, and repeatability. For the validation, a combination of pharmacopoeial ATCC strains as well as in-house isolates were used. In addition, the evaluation study of this RST for in-process control of media/buffers was assessed by performing the limit of detection and equivalence with four representative microorganisms. Where applicable, results were statistically evaluated to demonstrate equivalence and no significant difference of the rapid method as compared with the CST method have been detected. All acceptance criteria have been met, and the solid-phase cytometry technology was successfully validated as an alternative sterility test for cell-based preparations and for its in-process control of media/buffer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"498-513"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Rapid Sterility Method Using Solid Phase Cytometry for Cell-Based Preparations and Culture Media and Buffers.\",\"authors\":\"Mahsa Mohammadi, Aline Bauer, David Roesti, Hans-Joachim Anders\",\"doi\":\"10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In this article, we demonstrate a rapid sterility testing method for non-filterable cell-based preparations and its in-process control media/buffers. The selected rapid sterility test (RST) in this work is based on the ScanRDI<sup>®</sup> system, which detects fluorescently labeled microorganisms with solid-phase cytometry. ScanRDI<sup>®</sup> has been chosen due to its sensitivity for detecting viable microorganisms down to one microbial cell with a shorter time to detection compared with the compendial sterility test (CST) method. The RST was validated for a CAR-T cell-therapy product with 4 days of time to detection (TTD) and evaluated for in-process control of media/buffers with real-time detection method success according to USP <1223>, Ph. Eur. 5.1.6, and PDA Technical Report No. 33. The validation parameters included limit of detection and equivalence in routine operations, specificity, robustness, ruggedness, and repeatability. For the validation, a combination of pharmacopoeial ATCC strains as well as in-house isolates were used. In addition, the evaluation study of this RST for in-process control of media/buffers was assessed by performing the limit of detection and equivalence with four representative microorganisms. Where applicable, results were statistically evaluated to demonstrate equivalence and no significant difference of the rapid method as compared with the CST method have been detected. All acceptance criteria have been met, and the solid-phase cytometry technology was successfully validated as an alternative sterility test for cell-based preparations and for its in-process control of media/buffer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"498-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2022.012775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们展示了一种针对不可过滤细胞制剂及其过程控制培养基/缓冲液的快速无菌检测方法。本文所选的快速无菌检测(RST)基于 ScanRDI® 系统,该系统通过固相细胞仪检测荧光标记的微生物。之所以选择 ScanRDI®,是因为与药典无菌测试 (CST) 方法相比,它能灵敏地检测出小至一个微生物细胞的存活微生物,而且检测时间更短。根据 USP、Ph. Eur.5.1.6 和 PDA 第 33 号技术报告。验证参数包括常规操作中的检测限和等效性、特异性、稳健性、坚固性和可重复性。在验证过程中,结合使用了药典 ATCC 菌株和内部分离菌株。此外,通过对四种代表性微生物进行检测限和等效性评估,对该 RST 用于培养基/缓冲液过程控制的评估研究进行了评估。在适用的情况下,对结果进行了统计评估,以证明其等效性,未发现快速方法与 CST 方法相比有显著差异。所有验收标准均已达到,固相细胞仪技术作为细胞制剂的替代无菌检测方法和培养基/缓冲液的过程控制方法已成功通过验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Rapid Sterility Method Using Solid Phase Cytometry for Cell-Based Preparations and Culture Media and Buffers.

In this article, we demonstrate a rapid sterility testing method for non-filterable cell-based preparations and its in-process control media/buffers. The selected rapid sterility test (RST) in this work is based on the ScanRDI® system, which detects fluorescently labeled microorganisms with solid-phase cytometry. ScanRDI® has been chosen due to its sensitivity for detecting viable microorganisms down to one microbial cell with a shorter time to detection compared with the compendial sterility test (CST) method. The RST was validated for a CAR-T cell-therapy product with 4 days of time to detection (TTD) and evaluated for in-process control of media/buffers with real-time detection method success according to USP <1223>, Ph. Eur. 5.1.6, and PDA Technical Report No. 33. The validation parameters included limit of detection and equivalence in routine operations, specificity, robustness, ruggedness, and repeatability. For the validation, a combination of pharmacopoeial ATCC strains as well as in-house isolates were used. In addition, the evaluation study of this RST for in-process control of media/buffers was assessed by performing the limit of detection and equivalence with four representative microorganisms. Where applicable, results were statistically evaluated to demonstrate equivalence and no significant difference of the rapid method as compared with the CST method have been detected. All acceptance criteria have been met, and the solid-phase cytometry technology was successfully validated as an alternative sterility test for cell-based preparations and for its in-process control of media/buffer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Addressing Medical Device Extractables and Leachables via Non-Target Analysis (NTA); The Analytical Evaluation Threshold (AET) and Quantitation. Definition of particle visibility threshold in parenteral drug products - towards standardization of visual inspection operator qualification. Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Application in Continued Process Verification. Comparing Container Closure Integrity Test Methods-Performance of Headspace Carbon Dioxide Analysis versus Helium Leakage Using Positive Controls. Case Studies on Changes and Proposed Process Development Approaches Reflecting Applicability of PDA Technical Report No. 89: Strategies for Vaccine Development and Lifecycle Management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1