肝硬化患者腹腔镜阑尾切除术的发病率和死亡率。

Yasir Al-Azzawi, Yasir Al-Abboodi, Matthew Fasullo, Tarek Najuib
{"title":"肝硬化患者腹腔镜阑尾切除术的发病率和死亡率。","authors":"Yasir Al-Azzawi,&nbsp;Yasir Al-Abboodi,&nbsp;Matthew Fasullo,&nbsp;Tarek Najuib","doi":"10.1177/1179552217746645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The perioperative mortality is significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis undergoing certain surgical procedures. In this study, we examined the inpatient perioperative mortality and morbidities in cirrhotic people who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database for 2010. Inclusion criteria were all race and sex who are 18 years or older. Those who have laparoscopic appendectomy and have a history of liver cirrhosis were assigned to case group. An equal random number of appendectomy-related admissions and those who have no history of liver cirrhosis were selected and placed in the control group. A binary logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the odds ratio for the mortality difference and postoperative complication including pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding. IBM SPSS statistics was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval of 95% and <i>P</i> value less than .05 were determined to define the statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 754 appendectomy-related admissions were identified-376 appendectomy-related admissions and history of cirrhosis and 378 admissions with appendectomy and no history of cirrhosis. Control group was not found to be statistically different from the case group when it comes to age, race, and sex. Of 754, 520 were white (73.5%), 334 (44.3%) were men. The mean age was 43.75 years for the case group and 46.68 years for the control group. Comparing cirrhotic with noncirrhotic group, the mean length of stay was 1.1 vs 1.52 days, inpatient mortality was 2 (0.5%) vs 1 (0.3%) (<i>P</i> = .56), pneumonia 8 (2.1%) vs 3 (0.8%) (<i>P</i> = .142), surgical site infection 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (<i>P</i> = .652), UTI 18 (4.8%) vs 12 (3.2%) (<i>P</i> = .26), and postoperative bleeding 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (<i>P</i> = .65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Appendectomy-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients are not different from noncirrhotic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10382,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","volume":"11 ","pages":"1179552217746645"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179552217746645","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients with Cirrhosis.\",\"authors\":\"Yasir Al-Azzawi,&nbsp;Yasir Al-Abboodi,&nbsp;Matthew Fasullo,&nbsp;Tarek Najuib\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179552217746645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The perioperative mortality is significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis undergoing certain surgical procedures. In this study, we examined the inpatient perioperative mortality and morbidities in cirrhotic people who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database for 2010. Inclusion criteria were all race and sex who are 18 years or older. Those who have laparoscopic appendectomy and have a history of liver cirrhosis were assigned to case group. An equal random number of appendectomy-related admissions and those who have no history of liver cirrhosis were selected and placed in the control group. A binary logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the odds ratio for the mortality difference and postoperative complication including pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding. IBM SPSS statistics was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval of 95% and <i>P</i> value less than .05 were determined to define the statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 754 appendectomy-related admissions were identified-376 appendectomy-related admissions and history of cirrhosis and 378 admissions with appendectomy and no history of cirrhosis. Control group was not found to be statistically different from the case group when it comes to age, race, and sex. Of 754, 520 were white (73.5%), 334 (44.3%) were men. The mean age was 43.75 years for the case group and 46.68 years for the control group. Comparing cirrhotic with noncirrhotic group, the mean length of stay was 1.1 vs 1.52 days, inpatient mortality was 2 (0.5%) vs 1 (0.3%) (<i>P</i> = .56), pneumonia 8 (2.1%) vs 3 (0.8%) (<i>P</i> = .142), surgical site infection 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (<i>P</i> = .652), UTI 18 (4.8%) vs 12 (3.2%) (<i>P</i> = .26), and postoperative bleeding 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (<i>P</i> = .65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Appendectomy-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients are not different from noncirrhotic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"1179552217746645\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179552217746645\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552217746645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179552217746645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

导读:肝硬化患者接受某些外科手术的围手术期死亡率明显较高。在这项研究中,我们调查了肝硬化患者行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的围手术期死亡率和发病率。方法:我们使用2010年全国住院患者样本数据库进行回顾性分析。纳入标准是所有年龄在18岁或以上的种族和性别。那些做过腹腔镜阑尾切除术并有肝硬化病史的人被分配到病例组。随机选择同等数量的阑尾切除术相关入院患者和无肝硬化病史的患者作为对照组。采用二元logistic回归统计检验检验两组死亡率差异及肺炎、尿路感染、手术部位感染、术后出血等术后并发症的比值比。采用IBM SPSS统计软件进行分析。以95%的置信区间和P值小于0.05来定义统计学显著性。结果:共有754例与阑尾切除术相关的住院患者,其中376例与阑尾切除术相关且有肝硬化史,378例有阑尾切除术且无肝硬化史。在年龄、种族和性别方面,对照组与病例组没有统计学差异。其中白人520人(73.5%),男性334人(44.3%)。病例组平均年龄43.75岁,对照组平均年龄46.68岁。肝硬化组与非肝硬化组比较,平均住院时间1.1天vs 1.52天,住院死亡率2 (0.5%)vs 1 (0.3%) (P = 0.56),肺炎8 (2.1%)vs 3 (0.8%) (P = 0.142),手术部位感染3 (0.8%)vs 2 (0.5%) (P = 0.652), UTI 18 (4.8%) vs 12 (3.2%) (P = 0.26),术后出血3 (0.8%)vs 2 (0.5%) (P = 0.65)。结论:肝硬化患者阑尾切除术相关的发病率和死亡率与非肝硬化患者没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Patients with Cirrhosis.

Introduction: The perioperative mortality is significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis undergoing certain surgical procedures. In this study, we examined the inpatient perioperative mortality and morbidities in cirrhotic people who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Inpatient Sample database for 2010. Inclusion criteria were all race and sex who are 18 years or older. Those who have laparoscopic appendectomy and have a history of liver cirrhosis were assigned to case group. An equal random number of appendectomy-related admissions and those who have no history of liver cirrhosis were selected and placed in the control group. A binary logistic regression statistical test was used to examine the odds ratio for the mortality difference and postoperative complication including pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), surgical site infection, postoperative bleeding. IBM SPSS statistics was used to execute the analysis. A confidence interval of 95% and P value less than .05 were determined to define the statistical significance.

Result: A total of 754 appendectomy-related admissions were identified-376 appendectomy-related admissions and history of cirrhosis and 378 admissions with appendectomy and no history of cirrhosis. Control group was not found to be statistically different from the case group when it comes to age, race, and sex. Of 754, 520 were white (73.5%), 334 (44.3%) were men. The mean age was 43.75 years for the case group and 46.68 years for the control group. Comparing cirrhotic with noncirrhotic group, the mean length of stay was 1.1 vs 1.52 days, inpatient mortality was 2 (0.5%) vs 1 (0.3%) (P = .56), pneumonia 8 (2.1%) vs 3 (0.8%) (P = .142), surgical site infection 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (P = .652), UTI 18 (4.8%) vs 12 (3.2%) (P = .26), and postoperative bleeding 3 (0.8%) vs 2 (0.5%) (P = .65).

Conclusions: Appendectomy-related morbidity and mortality in cirrhotic patients are not different from noncirrhotic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology
Clinical Medicine Insights. Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biodegradable Stents in Resistant Peptic Oesophageal Stricture: Is It the Right Way to Go? Melanosis Coli: A Helpful Contrast Effect or a Harmful Pigmentation? Understanding Therapeutic Concepts in Crohn's Disease. The Benefits of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in the Muscular and Functional Capacity of Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial. Impact of Video Aid on Quality of Bowel Preparation Among Patients Undergoing Outpatient Screening Colonoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1