ALSFRS-R-SE:经修订的肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表的改编、注释和自解释版本。

André Maier, Matthias Boentert, Peter Reilich, Simon Witzel, Susanne Petri, Julian Großkreutz, Moritz Metelmann, Paul Lingor, Isabell Cordts, Johannes Dorst, Daniel Zeller, René Günther, Tim Hagenacker, Torsten Grehl, Susanne Spittel, Joachim Schuster, Albert Ludolph, Thomas Meyer
{"title":"ALSFRS-R-SE:经修订的肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表的改编、注释和自解释版本。","authors":"André Maier,&nbsp;Matthias Boentert,&nbsp;Peter Reilich,&nbsp;Simon Witzel,&nbsp;Susanne Petri,&nbsp;Julian Großkreutz,&nbsp;Moritz Metelmann,&nbsp;Paul Lingor,&nbsp;Isabell Cordts,&nbsp;Johannes Dorst,&nbsp;Daniel Zeller,&nbsp;René Günther,&nbsp;Tim Hagenacker,&nbsp;Torsten Grehl,&nbsp;Susanne Spittel,&nbsp;Joachim Schuster,&nbsp;Albert Ludolph,&nbsp;Thomas Meyer","doi":"10.1186/s42466-022-00224-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ALS Functional Rating Scale in its revised version (ALSFRS-R) is a disease-specific severity score that reflects motor impairment and functional deterioration in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It has been widely applied in both clinical practice and ALS research. However, in Germany, several variants of the scale, each differing slightly from the others, have developed over time and are currently in circulation. This lack of uniformity potentially hampers data interpretation and may decrease item validity. Furthermore, shortcomings within the standard ALSFRS-R questions and answer options can limit the quality and conclusiveness of collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multistage consensus-building process, 18 clinical ALS experts from the German ALS/MND network analyzed the ALSFRS-R in its current form and created an adapted, annotated, and revised scale that closely adheres to the well-established standardized English version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten German-language variants of the ALSFRS-R were collected, three of which contained instructions for self-assessment. All of these variants were compiled and a comprehensive linguistic revision was undertaken. A short introduction was added to the resulting scale, comprising general instructions for use and explanations for each of the five reply options per item. This adapted version of the scale, named ALSFRS-R-SE (with the \"SE\" referring to \"self-explanatory\"), was carefully reviewed for language and comprehensibility, in both German and English.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An adapted and annotated version of the ALSFRS-R scale was developed through a multistage consensus process. The decision to include brief explanations of specific scale items and reply options was intended to facilitate ALSFRS-R-SE assessments by both healthcare professionals and patients. Further studies are required to investigate the accuracy and utility of the ALSFRS-R-SE in controlled trials and clinical real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19169,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research and Practice","volume":"4 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753252/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ALSFRS-R-SE: an adapted, annotated, and self-explanatory version of the revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale.\",\"authors\":\"André Maier,&nbsp;Matthias Boentert,&nbsp;Peter Reilich,&nbsp;Simon Witzel,&nbsp;Susanne Petri,&nbsp;Julian Großkreutz,&nbsp;Moritz Metelmann,&nbsp;Paul Lingor,&nbsp;Isabell Cordts,&nbsp;Johannes Dorst,&nbsp;Daniel Zeller,&nbsp;René Günther,&nbsp;Tim Hagenacker,&nbsp;Torsten Grehl,&nbsp;Susanne Spittel,&nbsp;Joachim Schuster,&nbsp;Albert Ludolph,&nbsp;Thomas Meyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-022-00224-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ALS Functional Rating Scale in its revised version (ALSFRS-R) is a disease-specific severity score that reflects motor impairment and functional deterioration in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It has been widely applied in both clinical practice and ALS research. However, in Germany, several variants of the scale, each differing slightly from the others, have developed over time and are currently in circulation. This lack of uniformity potentially hampers data interpretation and may decrease item validity. Furthermore, shortcomings within the standard ALSFRS-R questions and answer options can limit the quality and conclusiveness of collected data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multistage consensus-building process, 18 clinical ALS experts from the German ALS/MND network analyzed the ALSFRS-R in its current form and created an adapted, annotated, and revised scale that closely adheres to the well-established standardized English version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten German-language variants of the ALSFRS-R were collected, three of which contained instructions for self-assessment. All of these variants were compiled and a comprehensive linguistic revision was undertaken. A short introduction was added to the resulting scale, comprising general instructions for use and explanations for each of the five reply options per item. This adapted version of the scale, named ALSFRS-R-SE (with the \\\"SE\\\" referring to \\\"self-explanatory\\\"), was carefully reviewed for language and comprehensibility, in both German and English.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An adapted and annotated version of the ALSFRS-R scale was developed through a multistage consensus process. The decision to include brief explanations of specific scale items and reply options was intended to facilitate ALSFRS-R-SE assessments by both healthcare professionals and patients. Further studies are required to investigate the accuracy and utility of the ALSFRS-R-SE in controlled trials and clinical real-world settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9753252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00224-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-022-00224-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:ALS功能评定量表修订版(ALSFRS-R)是一种疾病特异性严重程度评分,反映肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的运动损伤和功能恶化。它已广泛应用于临床实践和ALS研究。然而,在德国,随着时间的推移发展出了几种不同的比额表,每一种都略有不同,目前正在流通。这种一致性的缺乏可能会阻碍数据的解释,并可能降低项目的有效性。此外,标准ALSFRS-R问题和答案选项中的缺点可能会限制收集数据的质量和结论性。方法:来自德国ALS/MND网络的18名临床ALS专家在多阶段建立共识的过程中,分析了目前形式的ALSFRS-R,并创建了一个改编、注释和修订的量表,该量表与已建立的标准化英文版本密切相关。结果:共收集到10份ALSFRS-R的德文变体,其中3份包含自评说明。对所有这些变体进行了汇编,并进行了全面的语言修订。一个简短的介绍被添加到最终的量表中,包括使用的一般说明和每个项目五个回答选项的解释。这个改版的量表被命名为ALSFRS-R-SE(其中“SE”指的是“不言自明”),经过了德语和英语的语言和可理解性的仔细审查。结论:ALSFRS-R量表的改编和注释版本是通过多阶段共识过程制定的。决定包括对特定量表项目和回答选项的简要解释,旨在促进医疗保健专业人员和患者对ALSFRS-R-SE的评估。需要进一步的研究来调查ALSFRS-R-SE在对照试验和临床现实环境中的准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ALSFRS-R-SE: an adapted, annotated, and self-explanatory version of the revised amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale.

Background: The ALS Functional Rating Scale in its revised version (ALSFRS-R) is a disease-specific severity score that reflects motor impairment and functional deterioration in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). It has been widely applied in both clinical practice and ALS research. However, in Germany, several variants of the scale, each differing slightly from the others, have developed over time and are currently in circulation. This lack of uniformity potentially hampers data interpretation and may decrease item validity. Furthermore, shortcomings within the standard ALSFRS-R questions and answer options can limit the quality and conclusiveness of collected data.

Methods: In a multistage consensus-building process, 18 clinical ALS experts from the German ALS/MND network analyzed the ALSFRS-R in its current form and created an adapted, annotated, and revised scale that closely adheres to the well-established standardized English version.

Results: Ten German-language variants of the ALSFRS-R were collected, three of which contained instructions for self-assessment. All of these variants were compiled and a comprehensive linguistic revision was undertaken. A short introduction was added to the resulting scale, comprising general instructions for use and explanations for each of the five reply options per item. This adapted version of the scale, named ALSFRS-R-SE (with the "SE" referring to "self-explanatory"), was carefully reviewed for language and comprehensibility, in both German and English.

Conclusion: An adapted and annotated version of the ALSFRS-R scale was developed through a multistage consensus process. The decision to include brief explanations of specific scale items and reply options was intended to facilitate ALSFRS-R-SE assessments by both healthcare professionals and patients. Further studies are required to investigate the accuracy and utility of the ALSFRS-R-SE in controlled trials and clinical real-world settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Resting state EEG as biomarker of cognitive training and physical activity's joint effect in Parkinson's patients with mild cognitive impairment. Camptocormia due to myotinilopathy, Parkinson's disease, or both? : Camptocormia and axial myopathy. Evolution of neurodegeneration in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus: a monocentric follow up study. Can ChatGPT explain it? Use of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis communication. German guidelines on community-acquired acute bacterial meningitis in adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1