Ronel Roos, Heleen van Aswegen, Daleen Casteleijn, Catherine H Thurling
{"title":"学生和教育工作者对一次性临床前ICU模拟活动的看法。","authors":"Ronel Roos, Heleen van Aswegen, Daleen Casteleijn, Catherine H Thurling","doi":"10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physiotherapy skills such as suction and manual hyperinflation (MHI) are used to manage patients in intensive care. Performing these skills effectively and safely requires a level of expertise. It is unknown whether a once-off preclinical high-fidelity simulation activity incorporating these skills would translate to clinical practice inclusion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine students' perceptions of a simulation-based education (SBE) activity and clinical educators' opinions of students' implementation of skills into practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our study consisted of two parts: a retrospective record review of students' feedback with the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) and the Simulation Laboratory Questionnaire. A nominal group technique (NGT) with clinical educators provided information on students' skills implementation. Descriptive data analysis was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six SBE sessions, lasting 3 hours each, with 49 students (<i>n</i> = 8-9 students per session) were undertaken. Students perceived the teaching activity positively. Five (33.33%) of 15 clinical educators participated in the NGT. Participants had a mean age of 35.8 (± 8.9) years, were qualified for 13.9 (± 8.9) years and had been supervising students for 7.8 (± 6.7) years. The clinical educators' top five opinions regarding students' implementation of the intensive care unit (ICU) skills were: handling skills improved, students had greater confidence performing these skills, students were more observant of a patient's response to the skill being performed, students had better theoretical knowledge and students had more accurate recall for precautions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical educators reported a change in students' clinical practice with regard to skills implementation.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A once-off preclinical SBE activity influences students' ICU practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44180,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"78 1","pages":"1830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724079/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of students and educators regarding a once-off pre-clinical ICU simulation activity.\",\"authors\":\"Ronel Roos, Heleen van Aswegen, Daleen Casteleijn, Catherine H Thurling\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1830\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physiotherapy skills such as suction and manual hyperinflation (MHI) are used to manage patients in intensive care. Performing these skills effectively and safely requires a level of expertise. It is unknown whether a once-off preclinical high-fidelity simulation activity incorporating these skills would translate to clinical practice inclusion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine students' perceptions of a simulation-based education (SBE) activity and clinical educators' opinions of students' implementation of skills into practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Our study consisted of two parts: a retrospective record review of students' feedback with the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) and the Simulation Laboratory Questionnaire. A nominal group technique (NGT) with clinical educators provided information on students' skills implementation. Descriptive data analysis was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six SBE sessions, lasting 3 hours each, with 49 students (<i>n</i> = 8-9 students per session) were undertaken. Students perceived the teaching activity positively. Five (33.33%) of 15 clinical educators participated in the NGT. Participants had a mean age of 35.8 (± 8.9) years, were qualified for 13.9 (± 8.9) years and had been supervising students for 7.8 (± 6.7) years. The clinical educators' top five opinions regarding students' implementation of the intensive care unit (ICU) skills were: handling skills improved, students had greater confidence performing these skills, students were more observant of a patient's response to the skill being performed, students had better theoretical knowledge and students had more accurate recall for precautions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical educators reported a change in students' clinical practice with regard to skills implementation.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A once-off preclinical SBE activity influences students' ICU practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"1830\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9724079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Physiotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1830\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Perceptions of students and educators regarding a once-off pre-clinical ICU simulation activity.
Background: Physiotherapy skills such as suction and manual hyperinflation (MHI) are used to manage patients in intensive care. Performing these skills effectively and safely requires a level of expertise. It is unknown whether a once-off preclinical high-fidelity simulation activity incorporating these skills would translate to clinical practice inclusion.
Objectives: To determine students' perceptions of a simulation-based education (SBE) activity and clinical educators' opinions of students' implementation of skills into practice.
Method: Our study consisted of two parts: a retrospective record review of students' feedback with the Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified (SET-M) and the Simulation Laboratory Questionnaire. A nominal group technique (NGT) with clinical educators provided information on students' skills implementation. Descriptive data analysis was undertaken.
Results: Six SBE sessions, lasting 3 hours each, with 49 students (n = 8-9 students per session) were undertaken. Students perceived the teaching activity positively. Five (33.33%) of 15 clinical educators participated in the NGT. Participants had a mean age of 35.8 (± 8.9) years, were qualified for 13.9 (± 8.9) years and had been supervising students for 7.8 (± 6.7) years. The clinical educators' top five opinions regarding students' implementation of the intensive care unit (ICU) skills were: handling skills improved, students had greater confidence performing these skills, students were more observant of a patient's response to the skill being performed, students had better theoretical knowledge and students had more accurate recall for precautions.
Conclusion: Clinical educators reported a change in students' clinical practice with regard to skills implementation.