{"title":"显微外科手术中医源性损伤的血管修复:单一机构18例临床调查和回顾。","authors":"Shigeomi Yokoya, Akihiko Hino, Hideki Oka","doi":"10.1055/a-2156-5586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Intracranial vascular injury (VI) due to surgery is a critical complication that can lead to serious neurologic deficits. To our knowledge, only a few review articles on VI during an operation have been published so far. We retrospectively investigated the type, cause, and measurement of VI during surgery at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Unexpected VI cases occurred in 18 of 2,228 craniotomy procedures, including 794 aneurysm clippings and 357 tumor resections. We investigated the causes and coping techniques of the VI cases, as well as their full details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were six cases of aneurysm neck tear, one case of sylvian vein injury, and one case of superior trunk perforation during direct clipping. Regarding tumor resection procedures, nine cases of arterial injury and one case of cortical vein injury were extracted. Almost all VIs were caused by carelessness or basic manipulation mistakes. We repaired all these cases with simple placement of suture threads with or without pinch clips, flow alteration using bypass techniques, and in 16 cases no neurologic deficit or deterioration on imaging occurred; however, 3 patients were verified to have ischemic changes on postoperative imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Most VIs were directly caused by a simple error and carelessness of an operator or an assistant. Many of these injuries can be avoided if a basic set of rules are followed and remembered during the surgical procedure. However, the surgical procedure involves human work, and errors cannot be eradicated even upon maximum concentration levels. Neurosurgeons should be prepared for an eventual quick repair of an unexpected cerebral VI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"485-491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vascular Repair for Iatrogenic Injury during Microsurgical Procedures: Clinical Investigation and Review of 18 Cases at a Single Institution.\",\"authors\":\"Shigeomi Yokoya, Akihiko Hino, Hideki Oka\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2156-5586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Intracranial vascular injury (VI) due to surgery is a critical complication that can lead to serious neurologic deficits. To our knowledge, only a few review articles on VI during an operation have been published so far. We retrospectively investigated the type, cause, and measurement of VI during surgery at our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Unexpected VI cases occurred in 18 of 2,228 craniotomy procedures, including 794 aneurysm clippings and 357 tumor resections. We investigated the causes and coping techniques of the VI cases, as well as their full details.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> There were six cases of aneurysm neck tear, one case of sylvian vein injury, and one case of superior trunk perforation during direct clipping. Regarding tumor resection procedures, nine cases of arterial injury and one case of cortical vein injury were extracted. Almost all VIs were caused by carelessness or basic manipulation mistakes. We repaired all these cases with simple placement of suture threads with or without pinch clips, flow alteration using bypass techniques, and in 16 cases no neurologic deficit or deterioration on imaging occurred; however, 3 patients were verified to have ischemic changes on postoperative imaging.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Most VIs were directly caused by a simple error and carelessness of an operator or an assistant. Many of these injuries can be avoided if a basic set of rules are followed and remembered during the surgical procedure. However, the surgical procedure involves human work, and errors cannot be eradicated even upon maximum concentration levels. Neurosurgeons should be prepared for an eventual quick repair of an unexpected cerebral VI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"485-491\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2156-5586\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/8/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2156-5586","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Vascular Repair for Iatrogenic Injury during Microsurgical Procedures: Clinical Investigation and Review of 18 Cases at a Single Institution.
Background: Intracranial vascular injury (VI) due to surgery is a critical complication that can lead to serious neurologic deficits. To our knowledge, only a few review articles on VI during an operation have been published so far. We retrospectively investigated the type, cause, and measurement of VI during surgery at our institution.
Methods: Unexpected VI cases occurred in 18 of 2,228 craniotomy procedures, including 794 aneurysm clippings and 357 tumor resections. We investigated the causes and coping techniques of the VI cases, as well as their full details.
Results: There were six cases of aneurysm neck tear, one case of sylvian vein injury, and one case of superior trunk perforation during direct clipping. Regarding tumor resection procedures, nine cases of arterial injury and one case of cortical vein injury were extracted. Almost all VIs were caused by carelessness or basic manipulation mistakes. We repaired all these cases with simple placement of suture threads with or without pinch clips, flow alteration using bypass techniques, and in 16 cases no neurologic deficit or deterioration on imaging occurred; however, 3 patients were verified to have ischemic changes on postoperative imaging.
Conclusions: Most VIs were directly caused by a simple error and carelessness of an operator or an assistant. Many of these injuries can be avoided if a basic set of rules are followed and remembered during the surgical procedure. However, the surgical procedure involves human work, and errors cannot be eradicated even upon maximum concentration levels. Neurosurgeons should be prepared for an eventual quick repair of an unexpected cerebral VI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies.
JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.