概念分析的选择和应用指南。

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING NURSING FORUM Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1111/nuf.12836
Misty M Richmond, Deltra Muoki, Fuqin Liu, Donna S Tilley
{"title":"概念分析的选择和应用指南。","authors":"Misty M Richmond,&nbsp;Deltra Muoki,&nbsp;Fuqin Liu,&nbsp;Donna S Tilley","doi":"10.1111/nuf.12836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance in the process of choosing a method to use for concept analysis (CA), a commonly used method for defining and exploring concepts in nursing. Best outcomes are achieved when there is close alignment between the concept, the purpose of the analysis, and the CA method utilized. This process has become complicated by the number of approaches developed in recent decades, with varying purposes and theoretical underpinnings. Other variables include the specific type of concept chosen and the purpose of the analysis, which may vary from clinical care to theory development to research design. The net result is a process that can be confusing for experienced and inexperienced scholars alike. An overview of the most common CA methods used in recent years, including theoretical underpinnings, intended uses, steps involved in the process, and recommended applications, is followed by detailed guidance in selecting a method to use for the specific concept to be analyzed. Also provided is a discussion of the factors to consider in choosing a concept for analysis. The desired outcome is the promotion of high-quality CA that advance the scholarship of nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":51525,"journal":{"name":"NURSING FORUM","volume":"57 6","pages":"1599-1605"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A guide to the selection and application of concept analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Misty M Richmond,&nbsp;Deltra Muoki,&nbsp;Fuqin Liu,&nbsp;Donna S Tilley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nuf.12836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance in the process of choosing a method to use for concept analysis (CA), a commonly used method for defining and exploring concepts in nursing. Best outcomes are achieved when there is close alignment between the concept, the purpose of the analysis, and the CA method utilized. This process has become complicated by the number of approaches developed in recent decades, with varying purposes and theoretical underpinnings. Other variables include the specific type of concept chosen and the purpose of the analysis, which may vary from clinical care to theory development to research design. The net result is a process that can be confusing for experienced and inexperienced scholars alike. An overview of the most common CA methods used in recent years, including theoretical underpinnings, intended uses, steps involved in the process, and recommended applications, is followed by detailed guidance in selecting a method to use for the specific concept to be analyzed. Also provided is a discussion of the factors to consider in choosing a concept for analysis. The desired outcome is the promotion of high-quality CA that advance the scholarship of nursing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"volume\":\"57 6\",\"pages\":\"1599-1605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NURSING FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NURSING FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是在选择一种用于概念分析(CA)的方法的过程中提供实用的指导,这是一种在护理中定义和探索概念的常用方法。当概念、分析的目的和所使用的CA方法之间有密切的一致性时,可以获得最佳结果。这一过程因近几十年来发展出的许多方法而变得复杂,这些方法的目的和理论基础各不相同。其他变量包括所选择的概念的具体类型和分析的目的,这可能因临床护理、理论发展和研究设计而异。最终的结果是,这个过程可能会让有经验和没有经验的学者都感到困惑。本文概述了近年来使用的最常见的CA方法,包括理论基础、预期用途、过程中涉及的步骤和推荐的应用程序,然后详细指导如何为要分析的特定概念选择要使用的方法。还提供了在选择一个概念进行分析时要考虑的因素的讨论。期望的结果是促进高质量的CA,推进护理学术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A guide to the selection and application of concept analysis.

The purpose of this article is to provide practical guidance in the process of choosing a method to use for concept analysis (CA), a commonly used method for defining and exploring concepts in nursing. Best outcomes are achieved when there is close alignment between the concept, the purpose of the analysis, and the CA method utilized. This process has become complicated by the number of approaches developed in recent decades, with varying purposes and theoretical underpinnings. Other variables include the specific type of concept chosen and the purpose of the analysis, which may vary from clinical care to theory development to research design. The net result is a process that can be confusing for experienced and inexperienced scholars alike. An overview of the most common CA methods used in recent years, including theoretical underpinnings, intended uses, steps involved in the process, and recommended applications, is followed by detailed guidance in selecting a method to use for the specific concept to be analyzed. Also provided is a discussion of the factors to consider in choosing a concept for analysis. The desired outcome is the promotion of high-quality CA that advance the scholarship of nursing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NURSING FORUM
NURSING FORUM NURSING-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Nursing Forum is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal that invites original manuscripts that explore, explicate or report issues, ideas, trends and innovations that shape the nursing profession. Research manuscripts should emphasize the implications rather than the methods or analysis. Quality improvement manuscripts should emphasize the outcomes and follow the SQUIRE Guidelines in creating the manuscript. Evidence-based manuscripts should emphasize the findings and implications for practice and follow PICOT format. Concept analysis manuscripts should emphasize the evidence for support of the concept and follow an accepted format for such analyses.
期刊最新文献
Concurrent Enrollment ADN-BSN Programs: A Call to Expand Access to This Innovative Approach to the BSN Clinical Supervision in Improving the Quality of Nursing Care: Empowerment of Medical-Surgical Hospitalization Teams Preterm Infant Care Practice among Nurses in Neonatal Care Units of Selected Hospitals of Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Study Self-Management Social Support in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Concept Analysis Stigma towards Chronically Ill Patients among Healthcare Workers Caring for COVID-19 Patients during the Outbreak in Jordan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1