进行性言语失用症患者的纵向特征,无明显的主要语音或韵律语音特征。

IF 2.1 2区 心理学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Brain and Language Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105314
Rene L. Utianski , Gabriela Meade , Joseph R. Duffy , Heather M. Clark , Hugo Botha , Mary M. Machulda , Dennis W. Dickson , Jennifer L. Whitwell , Keith A. Josephs
{"title":"进行性言语失用症患者的纵向特征,无明显的主要语音或韵律语音特征。","authors":"Rene L. Utianski ,&nbsp;Gabriela Meade ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Duffy ,&nbsp;Heather M. Clark ,&nbsp;Hugo Botha ,&nbsp;Mary M. Machulda ,&nbsp;Dennis W. Dickson ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Whitwell ,&nbsp;Keith A. Josephs","doi":"10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most recent studies of progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) have focused on patients with phonetic or prosodic predominant PAOS to understand the implications of the presenting clinical phenotype. Patients without a clearly predominating speech quality, or mixed AOS, have been excluded. Given the implications for disease progression, it is important to understand these patients early in the disease course to inform appropriate education and prognostication. The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of ten patients with initially mixed PAOS and how their clinical course evolves. Four patients were rated prosodic predominant later on (mild AOS at first visit); five were later designated phonetic (four with more than mild AOS at first visit); one was judged mixed at all visits. The study suggests patients without a clear predominance of speech features<!--> <!-->should still be included in PAOS studies and thought of on the continuum of the disease spectrum.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55330,"journal":{"name":"Brain and Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal characterization of patients with progressive apraxia of speech without clearly predominant phonetic or prosodic speech features\",\"authors\":\"Rene L. Utianski ,&nbsp;Gabriela Meade ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Duffy ,&nbsp;Heather M. Clark ,&nbsp;Hugo Botha ,&nbsp;Mary M. Machulda ,&nbsp;Dennis W. Dickson ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Whitwell ,&nbsp;Keith A. Josephs\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Most recent studies of progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) have focused on patients with phonetic or prosodic predominant PAOS to understand the implications of the presenting clinical phenotype. Patients without a clearly predominating speech quality, or mixed AOS, have been excluded. Given the implications for disease progression, it is important to understand these patients early in the disease course to inform appropriate education and prognostication. The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of ten patients with initially mixed PAOS and how their clinical course evolves. Four patients were rated prosodic predominant later on (mild AOS at first visit); five were later designated phonetic (four with more than mild AOS at first visit); one was judged mixed at all visits. The study suggests patients without a clear predominance of speech features<!--> <!-->should still be included in PAOS studies and thought of on the continuum of the disease spectrum.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain and Language\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10592101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain and Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X23000937\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain and Language","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0093934X23000937","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近对进行性言语失用症(PAOS)的研究大多集中在以语音或韵律为主的PAOS患者身上,以了解其临床表型的含义。没有明显占主导地位的语音质量或混合AOS的患者被排除在外。考虑到对疾病进展的影响,重要的是在病程早期了解这些患者,为适当的教育和预测提供信息。本研究的目的是描述一个由10名最初混合PAOS患者组成的队列,以及他们的临床病程如何演变。四名患者后来被评为韵律为主(第一次就诊时轻度AOS);五个后来被指定为语音(四个在第一次就诊时AOS超过轻度);在所有访问中都有一个被认为是好坏参半。这项研究表明,没有明显优势言语特征的患者仍应被纳入PAOS研究,并被认为是疾病谱的连续体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal characterization of patients with progressive apraxia of speech without clearly predominant phonetic or prosodic speech features

Most recent studies of progressive apraxia of speech (PAOS) have focused on patients with phonetic or prosodic predominant PAOS to understand the implications of the presenting clinical phenotype. Patients without a clearly predominating speech quality, or mixed AOS, have been excluded. Given the implications for disease progression, it is important to understand these patients early in the disease course to inform appropriate education and prognostication. The aim of this study was to describe a cohort of ten patients with initially mixed PAOS and how their clinical course evolves. Four patients were rated prosodic predominant later on (mild AOS at first visit); five were later designated phonetic (four with more than mild AOS at first visit); one was judged mixed at all visits. The study suggests patients without a clear predominance of speech features should still be included in PAOS studies and thought of on the continuum of the disease spectrum.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain and Language
Brain and Language 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
20.5 weeks
期刊介绍: An interdisciplinary journal, Brain and Language publishes articles that elucidate the complex relationships among language, brain, and behavior. The journal covers the large variety of modern techniques in cognitive neuroscience, including functional and structural brain imaging, electrophysiology, cellular and molecular neurobiology, genetics, lesion-based approaches, and computational modeling. All articles must relate to human language and be relevant to the understanding of its neurobiological and neurocognitive bases. Published articles in the journal are expected to have significant theoretical novelty and/or practical implications, and use perspectives and methods from psychology, linguistics, and neuroscience along with brain data and brain measures.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal trajectories of the neural encoding mechanisms of speech-sound features during the first year of life Temporary ambiguity and memory for the context of spoken language in adults with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury Revisiting nonword repetition as a clinical marker of developmental language disorder: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual L2 Cantonese Lateralization of activation within the superior temporal gyrus during speech perception in sleeping infants is associated with subsequent language skills in kindergarten: A passive listening task-fMRI study Transcranial direct stimulation over left inferior frontal gyrus improves language production and comprehension in post-stroke aphasia: A double-blind randomized controlled study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1