用Rubidum82正电子发射断层成像在mri证实的心肌瘢痕区域定量静息心肌血流。

Merrill Stewart, Sangeeta Shah, Richard Milani, Daniel Morin, Robert Bober
{"title":"用Rubidum82正电子发射断层成像在mri证实的心肌瘢痕区域定量静息心肌血流。","authors":"Merrill Stewart,&nbsp;Sangeeta Shah,&nbsp;Richard Milani,&nbsp;Daniel Morin,&nbsp;Robert Bober","doi":"10.17996/anc.21-00137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) within regions of myocardial scar as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) has not yet been assessed with the radiotracer Rubidium<sup>82</sup> (Rb<sup>82</sup>) or correlated with scar thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) offers high spatial resolution and identifies myocardial scar with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Using Rb<sup>82</sup> PET, we sought to characterize rMBF in regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses determined by cMRI. <i>Methods/Results</i>: Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, a resting Rb<sup>82</sup> PET study and a cMRI were identified. On cMRI, regions of infarction, defined as >50% LGE with akinesis, were sub-categorized as 50-75% LGE or >75% LGE, corresponding with increasing transmural scar thickness. PET zones of infarct based on size and %LGE by cMRI were quantified for mean and minimum rMBF. Mean rMBF (cc/min/g) in infarct zones with >75% LGE was 0.32±0.07 with a minimum rMBF of 0.19±0.03. In infarct zones with 50-75% LGE, rMBF was 0.45±0.14 (50-75% vs. >75%, p=0.002). <i>Conclusions</i>: We identified rMBF within cMRI confirmed regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses. rMBF has an inverse relationship with the extent of LGE on cMRI, with the most severe regions (>75% LGE) having mean and minimal rMBF (cc/min/g) of 0.32±0.07 and 0.19±0.03, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":72228,"journal":{"name":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9754780/pdf/8_7.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of Resting Myocardial Blood Flow Using Rubidum<sup>82</sup> Positron Emission Tomography in Regions with MRI-Confirmed Myocardial Scar.\",\"authors\":\"Merrill Stewart,&nbsp;Sangeeta Shah,&nbsp;Richard Milani,&nbsp;Daniel Morin,&nbsp;Robert Bober\",\"doi\":\"10.17996/anc.21-00137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background</i>: Resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) within regions of myocardial scar as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) has not yet been assessed with the radiotracer Rubidium<sup>82</sup> (Rb<sup>82</sup>) or correlated with scar thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) offers high spatial resolution and identifies myocardial scar with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Using Rb<sup>82</sup> PET, we sought to characterize rMBF in regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses determined by cMRI. <i>Methods/Results</i>: Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, a resting Rb<sup>82</sup> PET study and a cMRI were identified. On cMRI, regions of infarction, defined as >50% LGE with akinesis, were sub-categorized as 50-75% LGE or >75% LGE, corresponding with increasing transmural scar thickness. PET zones of infarct based on size and %LGE by cMRI were quantified for mean and minimum rMBF. Mean rMBF (cc/min/g) in infarct zones with >75% LGE was 0.32±0.07 with a minimum rMBF of 0.19±0.03. In infarct zones with 50-75% LGE, rMBF was 0.45±0.14 (50-75% vs. >75%, p=0.002). <i>Conclusions</i>: We identified rMBF within cMRI confirmed regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses. rMBF has an inverse relationship with the extent of LGE on cMRI, with the most severe regions (>75% LGE) having mean and minimal rMBF (cc/min/g) of 0.32±0.07 and 0.19±0.03, respectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of nuclear cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9754780/pdf/8_7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of nuclear cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of nuclear cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17996/anc.21-00137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:正电子发射断层扫描(PET)测量的心肌疤痕区域静息心肌血流量(rMBF)尚未用放射性示踪剂Rubidium82 (Rb82)评估或与疤痕厚度相关。心脏磁共振成像(cMRI)具有高空间分辨率,可以通过晚期钆增强(LGE)识别心肌疤痕。使用Rb82 PET,我们试图在cMRI确定的不同厚度的心肌疤痕区域中表征rMBF。方法/结果:确定有心肌梗死史的患者,静息Rb82 PET研究和cMRI。在cMRI上,定义为>50% LGE并运动的梗死区域被细分为50-75% LGE或>75% LGE,与跨壁疤痕厚度增加相对应。基于尺寸的PET梗死区和cMRI的%LGE量化平均和最小rMBF。LGE >75%的梗死区平均rMBF (cc/min/g)为0.32±0.07,最低rMBF为0.19±0.03。在LGE为50 ~ 75%的梗死区,rMBF为0.45±0.14 (50 ~ 75% vs >75%, p=0.002)。结论:我们在cMRI证实的不同厚度的心肌瘢痕区域中发现了rMBF。cMRI上rMBF与LGE程度呈负相关,LGE >75%的最严重区域的平均rMBF (cc/min/g)为0.32±0.07,最小rMBF (cc/min/g)为0.19±0.03。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantification of Resting Myocardial Blood Flow Using Rubidum82 Positron Emission Tomography in Regions with MRI-Confirmed Myocardial Scar.

Background: Resting myocardial blood flow (rMBF) within regions of myocardial scar as measured by positron emission tomography (PET) has not yet been assessed with the radiotracer Rubidium82 (Rb82) or correlated with scar thickness. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) offers high spatial resolution and identifies myocardial scar with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Using Rb82 PET, we sought to characterize rMBF in regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses determined by cMRI. Methods/Results: Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, a resting Rb82 PET study and a cMRI were identified. On cMRI, regions of infarction, defined as >50% LGE with akinesis, were sub-categorized as 50-75% LGE or >75% LGE, corresponding with increasing transmural scar thickness. PET zones of infarct based on size and %LGE by cMRI were quantified for mean and minimum rMBF. Mean rMBF (cc/min/g) in infarct zones with >75% LGE was 0.32±0.07 with a minimum rMBF of 0.19±0.03. In infarct zones with 50-75% LGE, rMBF was 0.45±0.14 (50-75% vs. >75%, p=0.002). Conclusions: We identified rMBF within cMRI confirmed regions of myocardial scar of varying thicknesses. rMBF has an inverse relationship with the extent of LGE on cMRI, with the most severe regions (>75% LGE) having mean and minimal rMBF (cc/min/g) of 0.32±0.07 and 0.19±0.03, respectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myocardial Strain Derived from 13N-ammonia Positron Emission Tomography: Detection of Ischemia-Related Wall Motion Abnormality. Phantom-Based Standardization Method for 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Heart-to-Mediastinum Ratio Validated by D-SPECT Versus Anger Camera. Modified Algorithm Using Total Count for Calculating Myocardial Washout Rate in Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography. The Application of Conditional Probability to Harmonize Nuclear Cardiology Test Results. Validation of a Five-Year Prognostic Model Using 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine Scintigraphy in Patients with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1