质子泵抑制剂是否会降低阿司匹林在缺血性卒中中的抗聚集作用?

Q3 Medicine Acta neurologica Taiwanica Pub Date : 2023-03-30
Tuğba Özel, Ali Ünal, Sebahat Özdem, Babur Dora
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂是否会降低阿司匹林在缺血性卒中中的抗聚集作用?","authors":"Tuğba Özel,&nbsp;Ali Ünal,&nbsp;Sebahat Özdem,&nbsp;Babur Dora","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of using acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) together with lansoprazole in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>199 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) using 100 mg aspirin regularly were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance before starting the study. 57 patients with aspirin resistance were excluded from the study. The remaining 142 patients were divided into two groups: the 1st group consisted of those with stomach discomfort and the 2nd group consisted of those without stomach discomfort. Patients in group 1 were given 30 mg of lansoprazole taken before breakfast in addition to aspirin therapy. All patients were re-evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance at a one-month follow-up. The antiaggregant activity was evaluated by the impedance aggregometry method in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 142 patients, 75 were in group 1, and 67 were in group 2. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution of vascular risk factors. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of aspirin efficacy. The dose of aspirin was increased in patients with aspirin resistance (AR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of 30 mg lansoprazole and 100 mg aspirin does not cause a decrease in antiaggregant activity in the early period, but chronic use was not evaluated in this study. Patients with AR may benefit from an increase in the dose of aspirin.</p>","PeriodicalId":7102,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","volume":"32(1) ","pages":"9-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does proton pump inhibitor reduce the antiaggregant efficacy of aspirin in ischemic stroke?\",\"authors\":\"Tuğba Özel,&nbsp;Ali Ünal,&nbsp;Sebahat Özdem,&nbsp;Babur Dora\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of using acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) together with lansoprazole in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>199 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) using 100 mg aspirin regularly were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance before starting the study. 57 patients with aspirin resistance were excluded from the study. The remaining 142 patients were divided into two groups: the 1st group consisted of those with stomach discomfort and the 2nd group consisted of those without stomach discomfort. Patients in group 1 were given 30 mg of lansoprazole taken before breakfast in addition to aspirin therapy. All patients were re-evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance at a one-month follow-up. The antiaggregant activity was evaluated by the impedance aggregometry method in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 142 patients, 75 were in group 1, and 67 were in group 2. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution of vascular risk factors. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of aspirin efficacy. The dose of aspirin was increased in patients with aspirin resistance (AR).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of 30 mg lansoprazole and 100 mg aspirin does not cause a decrease in antiaggregant activity in the early period, but chronic use was not evaluated in this study. Patients with AR may benefit from an increase in the dose of aspirin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta neurologica Taiwanica\",\"volume\":\"32(1) \",\"pages\":\"9-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta neurologica Taiwanica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Taiwanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价乙酰水杨酸(阿司匹林)联合兰索拉唑在缺血性脑卒中二级预防中的作用。材料与方法:199例诊断为缺血性脑卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)的患者,定期服用阿司匹林100 mg。在研究开始前,所有患者都被评估是否存在阿司匹林耐药性。57例阿司匹林耐药患者被排除在研究之外。其余142例患者分为两组:第一组为胃不适患者,第二组为无胃不适患者。1组患者在阿司匹林治疗的基础上,早餐前口服兰索拉唑30 mg。所有患者在一个月的随访中重新评估阿司匹林抵抗的存在。用阻抗聚集法评价两组抗聚集活性。结果:142例患者中,组1 75例,组2 67例。两组在血管危险因素的年龄和性别分布方面没有差异。在阿司匹林疗效方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。阿司匹林抵抗(AR)患者的阿司匹林剂量增加。结论:30 mg兰索拉唑与100 mg阿司匹林联用不会引起早期抗聚集活性降低,但本研究未对长期使用进行评估。AR患者可能受益于阿司匹林剂量的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does proton pump inhibitor reduce the antiaggregant efficacy of aspirin in ischemic stroke?

Objective: To evaluate the effect of using acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) together with lansoprazole in the secondary prevention of ischemic stroke.

Materials and methods: 199 patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) using 100 mg aspirin regularly were included in the study. All patients were evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance before starting the study. 57 patients with aspirin resistance were excluded from the study. The remaining 142 patients were divided into two groups: the 1st group consisted of those with stomach discomfort and the 2nd group consisted of those without stomach discomfort. Patients in group 1 were given 30 mg of lansoprazole taken before breakfast in addition to aspirin therapy. All patients were re-evaluated for the presence of aspirin resistance at a one-month follow-up. The antiaggregant activity was evaluated by the impedance aggregometry method in both groups.

Results: Of 142 patients, 75 were in group 1, and 67 were in group 2. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of age and gender distribution of vascular risk factors. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of aspirin efficacy. The dose of aspirin was increased in patients with aspirin resistance (AR).

Conclusion: The combination of 30 mg lansoprazole and 100 mg aspirin does not cause a decrease in antiaggregant activity in the early period, but chronic use was not evaluated in this study. Patients with AR may benefit from an increase in the dose of aspirin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Taiwanica
Acta neurologica Taiwanica Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute Asymmetric Sensorimotor Variant of Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy Triggered by mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccination. Hemorrhagic shock due to retroperitoneal hemorrhage: a rare complication of lumbar puncture. Coexistence of IgLON5-IgG and SOX1-IgG in a Patient with Progressive Brainstem Dysfunction. Ross syndrome with chronic cough and RF positivity: a case report. Evidence-Based Taiwan Consensus Recommendations for the treatment of Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1