{"title":"2012-2018 年特拉华州分娩过和未分娩过受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女的产后避孕药具使用情况、怀孕意向。","authors":"Khaleel Hussaini, George Yocher","doi":"10.32481/djph.2023.06.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess differences in postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions in women with a recent live birth who delivered a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affected infant.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using linked Delaware Birth Certificate Data, Hospital Discharge Data and PRAMS data for 2012-2018 (n = 6,358 singleton births), we assessed differences among women with and without a delivery of an NAS-affected infant by effective postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions. We calculated prevalence estimates, crude (cPOR), and prevalence odds ratios adjusted (aPOR) for NAS by maternal characteristics. We used alpha ≤ 0.05 to determine statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of NAS was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8 - 2.6). Effective postpartum contraceptive use was 60.4% (95% CI: 51.9-69.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 56.4% (95% CI: 55.1-57.8%) and cPOR was 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.7). Prevalence of intended pregnancy was 26.5% (95% CI: 18.9-34.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 53.0% (95% CI: 51.7-54.4) and cPOR was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.5). After adjustment, women who delivered an NAS-affected infant had lower odds (aPOR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.8) of indicating that their pregnancy was intended as compared to those who did not deliver an NAS-affected infant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no association between delivery of an NAS-affected infant and use of an effective postpartum contraceptive method. However, we found that pregnancy intendedness was lower among women delivering an NAS-affected infant compared with women without an NAS delivery even after accounting for maternal characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72774,"journal":{"name":"Delaware journal of public health","volume":"9 2","pages":"134-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/21/djph-92-025.PMC10445619.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postpartum Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy Intentions in Women With and Without a Delivery of a NAS-Affected Infant in Delaware, 2012-2018.\",\"authors\":\"Khaleel Hussaini, George Yocher\",\"doi\":\"10.32481/djph.2023.06.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess differences in postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions in women with a recent live birth who delivered a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affected infant.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Using linked Delaware Birth Certificate Data, Hospital Discharge Data and PRAMS data for 2012-2018 (n = 6,358 singleton births), we assessed differences among women with and without a delivery of an NAS-affected infant by effective postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions. We calculated prevalence estimates, crude (cPOR), and prevalence odds ratios adjusted (aPOR) for NAS by maternal characteristics. We used alpha ≤ 0.05 to determine statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of NAS was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8 - 2.6). Effective postpartum contraceptive use was 60.4% (95% CI: 51.9-69.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 56.4% (95% CI: 55.1-57.8%) and cPOR was 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.7). Prevalence of intended pregnancy was 26.5% (95% CI: 18.9-34.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 53.0% (95% CI: 51.7-54.4) and cPOR was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.5). After adjustment, women who delivered an NAS-affected infant had lower odds (aPOR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.8) of indicating that their pregnancy was intended as compared to those who did not deliver an NAS-affected infant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found no association between delivery of an NAS-affected infant and use of an effective postpartum contraceptive method. However, we found that pregnancy intendedness was lower among women delivering an NAS-affected infant compared with women without an NAS delivery even after accounting for maternal characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"134-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/21/djph-92-025.PMC10445619.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Delaware journal of public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2023.06.025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delaware journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2023.06.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:评估最近分娩过新生儿禁欲综合症(NAS)婴儿的活产妇女产后避孕药具使用情况和怀孕意愿的差异:评估最近分娩过新生儿禁欲综合征(NAS)患儿的活产妇女在产后避孕药具使用和怀孕意愿方面的差异:利用 2012-2018 年特拉华州出生证明数据、医院出院数据和 PRAMS 数据(n = 6358 例单胎新生儿),我们评估了分娩过受 NAS 影响婴儿的女性与未分娩过受 NAS 影响婴儿的女性在有效产后避孕药具使用和怀孕意愿方面的差异。我们按产妇特征计算了NAS的流行率估计值、粗略值(cPOR)和调整后的流行率几率比(aPOR)。我们使用α≤0.05来确定统计显著性:NAS发生率为2.2%(95% CI:1.8 - 2.6)。分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女产后有效避孕率为 60.4%(95% CI:51.9-69.0),而未分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女产后有效避孕率为 56.4%(95% CI:55.1-57.8%),cPOR 为 1.2(95% CI:0.8-1.7)。分娩过受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女中,计划怀孕率为 26.5%(95% CI:18.9-34.0),而未分娩过受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女中,计划怀孕率为 53.0%(95% CI:51.7-54.4),cPOR 为 0.3(95% CI:0.2-0.5)。经调整后,与未分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女相比,分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女表示其怀孕是有意的几率较低(aPOR = 0.5;95% CI:0.3-0.8):我们的研究发现,分娩受 NAS 影响的婴儿与使用有效的产后避孕方法之间没有关联。然而,我们发现,与未分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女相比,分娩受 NAS 影响婴儿的妇女的妊娠意愿较低,即使考虑了母亲的特征也是如此。
Postpartum Contraceptive Use, Pregnancy Intentions in Women With and Without a Delivery of a NAS-Affected Infant in Delaware, 2012-2018.
Objective: Assess differences in postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions in women with a recent live birth who delivered a neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) affected infant.
Study design: Using linked Delaware Birth Certificate Data, Hospital Discharge Data and PRAMS data for 2012-2018 (n = 6,358 singleton births), we assessed differences among women with and without a delivery of an NAS-affected infant by effective postpartum contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions. We calculated prevalence estimates, crude (cPOR), and prevalence odds ratios adjusted (aPOR) for NAS by maternal characteristics. We used alpha ≤ 0.05 to determine statistical significance.
Results: Prevalence of NAS was 2.2% (95% CI: 1.8 - 2.6). Effective postpartum contraceptive use was 60.4% (95% CI: 51.9-69.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 56.4% (95% CI: 55.1-57.8%) and cPOR was 1.2 (95% CI: 0.8-1.7). Prevalence of intended pregnancy was 26.5% (95% CI: 18.9-34.0) among women with delivery of an NAS-affected infant compared with a non-NAS delivery 53.0% (95% CI: 51.7-54.4) and cPOR was 0.3 (95% CI: 0.2-0.5). After adjustment, women who delivered an NAS-affected infant had lower odds (aPOR = 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-0.8) of indicating that their pregnancy was intended as compared to those who did not deliver an NAS-affected infant.
Conclusions: Our study found no association between delivery of an NAS-affected infant and use of an effective postpartum contraceptive method. However, we found that pregnancy intendedness was lower among women delivering an NAS-affected infant compared with women without an NAS delivery even after accounting for maternal characteristics.