习惯性步行速度和疲劳可解释中风后自我报告的功能能力。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2023-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-25 DOI:10.1002/pri.1990
Janaine Cunha Polese, Thaís Bueno Dias Albuquerque, Iza Faria-Fortini, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela
{"title":"习惯性步行速度和疲劳可解释中风后自我报告的功能能力。","authors":"Janaine Cunha Polese, Thaís Bueno Dias Albuquerque, Iza Faria-Fortini, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela","doi":"10.1002/pri.1990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals after stroke present several motor impairments, which reduced the functional capacity. The understanding of modifiable factors which are related to functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke could better direct clinical practice. However, the mechanisms that could influence functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine which modifiable variables would best predict self-reported functional capacity after stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety two individuals with chronic stroke, who had a mean age of 60 (SD 13) years and a time since the onset of the stroke of 52 (67) months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Regression analysis of cross-sectional data was used to investigate whether body mass index, habitual walking speed, physical activity levels, fatigue, motor recovery, walking distance, and residual strength deficits of the lower limb muscles would predict self-reported functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Habitual walking speed alone explained 48% of the variance in functional capacity. When fatigue was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Habitual walking speed and fatigue were significant predictors of self-reported functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke. These individuals may increase their functional capacity with interventions aimed at increasing walking speed and reducing fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Habitual walking speed and fatigue explain self-reported functional capacity after stroke.\",\"authors\":\"Janaine Cunha Polese, Thaís Bueno Dias Albuquerque, Iza Faria-Fortini, Luci Fuscaldi Teixeira-Salmela\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.1990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Individuals after stroke present several motor impairments, which reduced the functional capacity. The understanding of modifiable factors which are related to functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke could better direct clinical practice. However, the mechanisms that could influence functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke are not fully understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine which modifiable variables would best predict self-reported functional capacity after stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Research laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Ninety two individuals with chronic stroke, who had a mean age of 60 (SD 13) years and a time since the onset of the stroke of 52 (67) months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Regression analysis of cross-sectional data was used to investigate whether body mass index, habitual walking speed, physical activity levels, fatigue, motor recovery, walking distance, and residual strength deficits of the lower limb muscles would predict self-reported functional capacity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Habitual walking speed alone explained 48% of the variance in functional capacity. When fatigue was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Habitual walking speed and fatigue were significant predictors of self-reported functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke. These individuals may increase their functional capacity with interventions aimed at increasing walking speed and reducing fatigue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/12/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言中风后的患者会出现多种运动障碍,从而降低功能能力。了解与慢性脑卒中患者功能相关的可改变因素可以更好地指导临床实践。然而,影响慢性脑卒中患者功能能力的机制尚未完全明了:本研究旨在确定哪些可调节变量最能预测中风后自我报告的功能能力:设计:横断面:参与者:92 名慢性中风患者主要结果测量:对横断面数据进行回归分析,研究体重指数、习惯性步行速度、体力活动水平、疲劳、运动恢复、步行距离和下肢肌肉残余力量缺陷是否能预测自我报告的功能能力:结果:仅习惯性步行速度就能解释功能能力变异的 48%。结论:习惯性步行速度和疲劳可解释功能能力变异的48%:结论:习惯性步行速度和疲劳是慢性中风患者自我报告功能能力的重要预测因素。这些人可以通过旨在提高步行速度和减少疲劳的干预措施来提高其功能能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Habitual walking speed and fatigue explain self-reported functional capacity after stroke.

Introduction: Individuals after stroke present several motor impairments, which reduced the functional capacity. The understanding of modifiable factors which are related to functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke could better direct clinical practice. However, the mechanisms that could influence functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke are not fully understood.

Objective: This study aimed to determine which modifiable variables would best predict self-reported functional capacity after stroke.

Design: Cross-sectional.

Setting: Research laboratory setting.

Participants: Ninety two individuals with chronic stroke, who had a mean age of 60 (SD 13) years and a time since the onset of the stroke of 52 (67) months.

Main outcome measures: Regression analysis of cross-sectional data was used to investigate whether body mass index, habitual walking speed, physical activity levels, fatigue, motor recovery, walking distance, and residual strength deficits of the lower limb muscles would predict self-reported functional capacity.

Results: Habitual walking speed alone explained 48% of the variance in functional capacity. When fatigue was included in the model, the explained variance increased to 55%.

Conclusions: Habitual walking speed and fatigue were significant predictors of self-reported functional capacity in individuals with chronic stroke. These individuals may increase their functional capacity with interventions aimed at increasing walking speed and reducing fatigue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Greek version. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for walking independence in hospitalized older adults with a vertebral compression fracture. Electrodiagnosis for mitigating false-negative non-responsiveness in electrical evoked contractions: A case series exploring probable polyneuromyopathy induced by nonuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1