癌症的多基因评分。

IF 72.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Nature Reviews Cancer Pub Date : 2023-07-21 DOI:10.1038/s41568-023-00599-x
Xin Yang, Siddhartha Kar, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul D. P. Pharoah
{"title":"癌症的多基因评分。","authors":"Xin Yang, Siddhartha Kar, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul D. P. Pharoah","doi":"10.1038/s41568-023-00599-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the publication of the first genome-wide association study for cancer in 2007, thousands of common alleles that are associated with the risk of cancer have been identified. The relative risk associated with individual variants is small and of limited clinical significance. However, the combined effect of multiple risk variants as captured by polygenic scores (PGSs) may be much greater and therefore provide risk discrimination that is clinically useful. We review the considerable research efforts over the past 15 years for developing statistical methods for PGSs and their application in large-scale genome-wide association studies to develop PGSs for various cancers. We review the predictive performance of these PGSs and the multiple challenges currently limiting the clinical application of PGSs. Despite this, PGSs are beginning to be incorporated into clinical multifactorial risk prediction models to stratify risk in both clinical trials and clinical implementation studies. Since the advent of genome-wide association studies, thousands of common alleles have been linked with the risk of cancer. Here, Yang et al. review the development, utility and predictive power of polygenic risk scores and the ongoing debate about their potential for clinical application in cancer.","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"23 9","pages":"619-630"},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polygenic scores in cancer\",\"authors\":\"Xin Yang, Siddhartha Kar, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul D. P. Pharoah\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41568-023-00599-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the publication of the first genome-wide association study for cancer in 2007, thousands of common alleles that are associated with the risk of cancer have been identified. The relative risk associated with individual variants is small and of limited clinical significance. However, the combined effect of multiple risk variants as captured by polygenic scores (PGSs) may be much greater and therefore provide risk discrimination that is clinically useful. We review the considerable research efforts over the past 15 years for developing statistical methods for PGSs and their application in large-scale genome-wide association studies to develop PGSs for various cancers. We review the predictive performance of these PGSs and the multiple challenges currently limiting the clinical application of PGSs. Despite this, PGSs are beginning to be incorporated into clinical multifactorial risk prediction models to stratify risk in both clinical trials and clinical implementation studies. Since the advent of genome-wide association studies, thousands of common alleles have been linked with the risk of cancer. Here, Yang et al. review the development, utility and predictive power of polygenic risk scores and the ongoing debate about their potential for clinical application in cancer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"volume\":\"23 9\",\"pages\":\"619-630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":72.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-023-00599-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41568-023-00599-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2007年发表第一项癌症全基因组关联研究以来,已鉴定出数千种与癌症风险相关的常见等位基因。与个体变异相关的相对风险很小,临床意义有限。然而,多基因评分(PGSs)捕捉到的多种风险变体的综合效应可能要大得多,因此提供了临床有用的风险区分。我们回顾了过去15年来为开发PGS的统计方法所做的大量研究工作,以及它们在大规模全基因组关联研究中的应用,以开发各种癌症的PGS。我们回顾了这些PGS的预测性能以及目前限制PGS临床应用的多重挑战。尽管如此,PGS开始被纳入临床多因素风险预测模型,以在临床试验和临床实施研究中对风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polygenic scores in cancer
Since the publication of the first genome-wide association study for cancer in 2007, thousands of common alleles that are associated with the risk of cancer have been identified. The relative risk associated with individual variants is small and of limited clinical significance. However, the combined effect of multiple risk variants as captured by polygenic scores (PGSs) may be much greater and therefore provide risk discrimination that is clinically useful. We review the considerable research efforts over the past 15 years for developing statistical methods for PGSs and their application in large-scale genome-wide association studies to develop PGSs for various cancers. We review the predictive performance of these PGSs and the multiple challenges currently limiting the clinical application of PGSs. Despite this, PGSs are beginning to be incorporated into clinical multifactorial risk prediction models to stratify risk in both clinical trials and clinical implementation studies. Since the advent of genome-wide association studies, thousands of common alleles have been linked with the risk of cancer. Here, Yang et al. review the development, utility and predictive power of polygenic risk scores and the ongoing debate about their potential for clinical application in cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Cancer
Nature Reviews Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
111.90
自引率
0.40%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.
期刊最新文献
Chromothripsis in cancer. Dedicated centres and multinational platforms to improve patient care and address early-onset cancers Genetic and epigenetic bases of long-term adverse effects of childhood cancer therapy Developing multiple EGFR-mutant lung cancers Fanconi anaemia pathway induces chromosome shattering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1