诊断和困境:临床医生在儿童和青少年中使用“边缘性人格障碍”诊断的经验。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Personality and Mental Health Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1002/pmh.1541
Rose Papadopoullos, Paul Fisher, Adrian Leddy, Sarah Maxwell, Jo Hodgekins
{"title":"诊断和困境:临床医生在儿童和青少年中使用“边缘性人格障碍”诊断的经验。","authors":"Rose Papadopoullos,&nbsp;Paul Fisher,&nbsp;Adrian Leddy,&nbsp;Sarah Maxwell,&nbsp;Jo Hodgekins","doi":"10.1002/pmh.1541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis in adolescents is a relatively recent concept and a fast-emerging research area. Regarded by some as controversial, it is important for research to provide greater understanding of differing perspectives and their impact on the use of this diagnosis. Perspectives of 13 clinicians (therapists, psychiatrists and mental health nurses) were explored, to provide a contemporary understanding of perceptions and use of BPD diagnosis within child and adolescent mental health services in England. A particular focus was to explore dilemmas faced by clinicians and how these dilemmas were negotiated. This research took a qualitative, social constructionist approach to explore the in-depth views and experiences of each participant. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, to seek out patterns and commonalities across these clinical perspectives. Three overarching themes were generated: 'Who holds the power?', 'Dilemmas within the multidisciplinary team (MDT)' and 'The weightiness of making this decision'. Professional opinions of an adolescent BPD diagnosis are influenced by dominant and less dominant mental health discourses, including the impact of power, and availability of resources within the service context. The role of meaningful collaboration with young people, clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46871,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787350/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnosis and dilemma: Clinician experiences of the use of 'borderline personality disorder' diagnosis in children and adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Rose Papadopoullos,&nbsp;Paul Fisher,&nbsp;Adrian Leddy,&nbsp;Sarah Maxwell,&nbsp;Jo Hodgekins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmh.1541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis in adolescents is a relatively recent concept and a fast-emerging research area. Regarded by some as controversial, it is important for research to provide greater understanding of differing perspectives and their impact on the use of this diagnosis. Perspectives of 13 clinicians (therapists, psychiatrists and mental health nurses) were explored, to provide a contemporary understanding of perceptions and use of BPD diagnosis within child and adolescent mental health services in England. A particular focus was to explore dilemmas faced by clinicians and how these dilemmas were negotiated. This research took a qualitative, social constructionist approach to explore the in-depth views and experiences of each participant. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, to seek out patterns and commonalities across these clinical perspectives. Three overarching themes were generated: 'Who holds the power?', 'Dilemmas within the multidisciplinary team (MDT)' and 'The weightiness of making this decision'. Professional opinions of an adolescent BPD diagnosis are influenced by dominant and less dominant mental health discourses, including the impact of power, and availability of resources within the service context. The role of meaningful collaboration with young people, clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9787350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.1541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

青少年边缘型人格障碍(BPD)的诊断是一个相对较新的概念和新兴的研究领域。一些人认为这是有争议的,重要的是研究提供更多的理解不同的观点及其对使用这种诊断的影响。13名临床医生(治疗师、精神科医生和心理健康护士)的观点进行了探讨,以提供对英国儿童和青少年心理健康服务中BPD诊断的认知和使用的当代理解。一个特别的重点是探讨临床医生所面临的困境,以及这些困境是如何协商的。本研究采用质性的社会建构主义方法,深入探讨每位参与者的观点和经验。访谈使用主题分析进行分析,以找出这些临床观点的模式和共同点。会议产生了三个主要主题:“谁掌握权力?”,“多学科团队(MDT)中的困境”和“做出这个决定的重要性”。青少年BPD诊断的专业意见受到主导和非主导心理健康话语的影响,包括权力的影响,以及服务环境中资源的可用性。讨论了与年轻人有意义的合作的作用、临床意义和未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnosis and dilemma: Clinician experiences of the use of 'borderline personality disorder' diagnosis in children and adolescents.

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis in adolescents is a relatively recent concept and a fast-emerging research area. Regarded by some as controversial, it is important for research to provide greater understanding of differing perspectives and their impact on the use of this diagnosis. Perspectives of 13 clinicians (therapists, psychiatrists and mental health nurses) were explored, to provide a contemporary understanding of perceptions and use of BPD diagnosis within child and adolescent mental health services in England. A particular focus was to explore dilemmas faced by clinicians and how these dilemmas were negotiated. This research took a qualitative, social constructionist approach to explore the in-depth views and experiences of each participant. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis, to seek out patterns and commonalities across these clinical perspectives. Three overarching themes were generated: 'Who holds the power?', 'Dilemmas within the multidisciplinary team (MDT)' and 'The weightiness of making this decision'. Professional opinions of an adolescent BPD diagnosis are influenced by dominant and less dominant mental health discourses, including the impact of power, and availability of resources within the service context. The role of meaningful collaboration with young people, clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Personality and Mental Health: Multidisciplinary Studies from Personality Dysfunction to Criminal Behaviour aims to lead and shape the international field in this rapidly expanding area, uniting three distinct literatures: DSM-IV/ICD-10 defined personality disorders, psychopathy and offending behaviour. Through its multi-disciplinary and service orientated approach, Personality and Mental Health provides a peer-reviewed, authoritative resource for researchers, practitioners and policy makers working in the areas of personality and mental health.
期刊最新文献
Levels of grit in patients with borderline personality disorder: Description and prediction. Compatibility of Linehan's biosocial theory and the DSM‐5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders for borderline personality disorder Conceptualizing adult ADHD with the DSM alternative model of personality disorder. The structure of pathological personality traits and temperament in a Persian community sample. Response to "Antisocial personality traits relationship with behaviours and beliefs on COVID-19 containment measures: Investigation in a large Brazilian sample".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1