John C Chin, Christopher D Maroules, Andrew H Lin, Rolf E Graning, Cullen R Pressley
{"title":"低剂量ct显示冠状动脉钙化对肺癌筛查人群他汀类药物治疗的影响。","authors":"John C Chin, Christopher D Maroules, Andrew H Lin, Rolf E Graning, Cullen R Pressley","doi":"10.12788/fp.0318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Concomitant use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring with lung cancer screening (LCS) has been proposed to further determine ASCVD risk and mortality. We aimed to determine the validity of LDCT in identifying CAC and its impact on statin management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review from November 2020 to May 2021 of Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries who received LCS with LDCT and were referred for CAC scoring with electrocardiogram-gated CT. Of the 190 participants initially identified, 170 met study eligibility. The Agatston method was used to score CAC on both scan types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean (SD) age of 62.1 (4.6) years and were 70.6% male. CAC was seen more on ECG-gated CT compared with LDCT (88% vs 74%, <i>P</i> < .001). The Spearman correlation and Kendall W coefficient of concordance of CAC scores between the 2 scan types was 0.945 (<i>P</i> < .001) and 0.643, respectively. The κ statistic between CAC scores on the 2 different scans was 0.49 (SEκ = 0.048; 95% CI, -0.726-1.706), and the weighted κ statistic was 0.711. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean bias of 111.45 Agatston units, with limits of agreement between -268.64 and 491.54, suggesting CAC scores on electrocardiogram-gated CT were on average about 111 units higher than those on LDCT. There was a statistically significant proportion of nonstatin participants who met statin criteria based on additional CAC reporting (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAC scores are highly correlated and concordant between LDCT and electrocardiogram-gated CT. Smokers undergoing annual LDCT may benefit from concomitant CAC scoring to help stratify ASCVD risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"39 9","pages":"382-388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794164/pdf/fp-39-09-382.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reporting Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Impacts Statin Management in a Lung Cancer Screening Population.\",\"authors\":\"John C Chin, Christopher D Maroules, Andrew H Lin, Rolf E Graning, Cullen R Pressley\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Concomitant use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring with lung cancer screening (LCS) has been proposed to further determine ASCVD risk and mortality. We aimed to determine the validity of LDCT in identifying CAC and its impact on statin management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review from November 2020 to May 2021 of Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries who received LCS with LDCT and were referred for CAC scoring with electrocardiogram-gated CT. Of the 190 participants initially identified, 170 met study eligibility. The Agatston method was used to score CAC on both scan types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants had a mean (SD) age of 62.1 (4.6) years and were 70.6% male. CAC was seen more on ECG-gated CT compared with LDCT (88% vs 74%, <i>P</i> < .001). The Spearman correlation and Kendall W coefficient of concordance of CAC scores between the 2 scan types was 0.945 (<i>P</i> < .001) and 0.643, respectively. The κ statistic between CAC scores on the 2 different scans was 0.49 (SEκ = 0.048; 95% CI, -0.726-1.706), and the weighted κ statistic was 0.711. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean bias of 111.45 Agatston units, with limits of agreement between -268.64 and 491.54, suggesting CAC scores on electrocardiogram-gated CT were on average about 111 units higher than those on LDCT. There was a statistically significant proportion of nonstatin participants who met statin criteria based on additional CAC reporting (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CAC scores are highly correlated and concordant between LDCT and electrocardiogram-gated CT. Smokers undergoing annual LDCT may benefit from concomitant CAC scoring to help stratify ASCVD risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":\"39 9\",\"pages\":\"382-388\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9794164/pdf/fp-39-09-382.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:吸烟是动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的独立危险因素。建议在肺癌筛查(LCS)的同时使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)进行冠状动脉钙(CAC)评分,以进一步确定ASCVD的风险和死亡率。我们的目的是确定LDCT识别CAC的有效性及其对他汀类药物管理的影响。方法:我们对2020年11月至2021年5月接受LCS合并LDCT的军事卫生系统(MHS)受益人进行了回顾性研究,这些受益人被推荐使用心电图门控CT进行CAC评分。在最初确定的190名参与者中,170名符合研究资格。采用Agatston法对两种扫描类型的CAC进行评分。结果:参与者的平均(SD)年龄为62.1(4.6)岁,70.6%为男性。与LDCT相比,ecg门控CT显示CAC更多(88% vs 74%, P < 0.001)。两种扫描类型CAC评分的Spearman相关系数和Kendall W一致性系数分别为0.945 (P < 0.001)和0.643。2种不同扫描CAC评分之间的κ统计量为0.49 (SEκ = 0.048;95% CI, -0.726-1.706),加权κ统计量为0.711。Bland-Altman分析显示平均偏倚为111.45 Agatston单位,一致性限在-268.64和491.54之间,表明心电图门控CT的CAC评分平均比LDCT高111个单位。根据额外的CAC报告,符合他汀类药物标准的非他汀类药物参与者的比例具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:LDCT与心电图门控CT CAC评分具有高度相关性和一致性。每年进行LDCT的吸烟者可能受益于伴随的CAC评分,以帮助对ASCVD风险进行分层。
Reporting Coronary Artery Calcium on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Impacts Statin Management in a Lung Cancer Screening Population.
Background: Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Concomitant use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring with lung cancer screening (LCS) has been proposed to further determine ASCVD risk and mortality. We aimed to determine the validity of LDCT in identifying CAC and its impact on statin management.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review from November 2020 to May 2021 of Military Health System (MHS) beneficiaries who received LCS with LDCT and were referred for CAC scoring with electrocardiogram-gated CT. Of the 190 participants initially identified, 170 met study eligibility. The Agatston method was used to score CAC on both scan types.
Results: Participants had a mean (SD) age of 62.1 (4.6) years and were 70.6% male. CAC was seen more on ECG-gated CT compared with LDCT (88% vs 74%, P < .001). The Spearman correlation and Kendall W coefficient of concordance of CAC scores between the 2 scan types was 0.945 (P < .001) and 0.643, respectively. The κ statistic between CAC scores on the 2 different scans was 0.49 (SEκ = 0.048; 95% CI, -0.726-1.706), and the weighted κ statistic was 0.711. Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated a mean bias of 111.45 Agatston units, with limits of agreement between -268.64 and 491.54, suggesting CAC scores on electrocardiogram-gated CT were on average about 111 units higher than those on LDCT. There was a statistically significant proportion of nonstatin participants who met statin criteria based on additional CAC reporting (P < .001).
Conclusions: CAC scores are highly correlated and concordant between LDCT and electrocardiogram-gated CT. Smokers undergoing annual LDCT may benefit from concomitant CAC scoring to help stratify ASCVD risk.