聚焦心脏超声在围手术期的应用。

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371
McKenzie M Hollon, Caitlin Bradley, Ian McCullough, Emilee Borgmeier
{"title":"聚焦心脏超声在围手术期的应用。","authors":"McKenzie M Hollon, Caitlin Bradley, Ian McCullough, Emilee Borgmeier","doi":"10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, transthoracic cardiac ultrasound as a bedside assessment tool has seen tremendous growth; it is unparalleled in value as a diagnostic modality that is portable and low in cost and risk to the patient. Advances in ultrasound technology and a growing body of scientific evidence supporting the role of diagnostic ultrasound assessment in all areas of anesthesiology practice have propelled this growth.With these advances, the utility of perioperative ultrasound has been solidified and incorporated into educational directives. Cardiac ultrasound has been added to the list of core competencies for anesthesiologists provided by governing bodies of medical education (Accreditation Council for GraduateMedical Education), and onto the content outline for anesthesiology board certification (American Board of Anesthesiology) in the United States. Despite the growing support for focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), there is still wide variation in the utilization of this technology in perioperative environments. There are myriad reasons for delayed adoption of FOCUS by anesthesiologists, including lack of training and potential unfamiliarity with when and how to incorporate FOCUS into anesthetic practice. As the phrases point of care ultrasound (POCUS), “FOCUS,” and “perioperative echocardiography” come into daily use, anesthesiologists have the opportunity to advance patient care and add value to their practice with ultrasound. This article will review the scope and limitations of FOCUS, and the current evidence for the use of FOCUS throughout the perioperative setting, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative arenas and relevant work-flow considerations.","PeriodicalId":46852,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS","volume":"60 3","pages":"24-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative applications of focused cardiac ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"McKenzie M Hollon, Caitlin Bradley, Ian McCullough, Emilee Borgmeier\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decade, transthoracic cardiac ultrasound as a bedside assessment tool has seen tremendous growth; it is unparalleled in value as a diagnostic modality that is portable and low in cost and risk to the patient. Advances in ultrasound technology and a growing body of scientific evidence supporting the role of diagnostic ultrasound assessment in all areas of anesthesiology practice have propelled this growth.With these advances, the utility of perioperative ultrasound has been solidified and incorporated into educational directives. Cardiac ultrasound has been added to the list of core competencies for anesthesiologists provided by governing bodies of medical education (Accreditation Council for GraduateMedical Education), and onto the content outline for anesthesiology board certification (American Board of Anesthesiology) in the United States. Despite the growing support for focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), there is still wide variation in the utilization of this technology in perioperative environments. There are myriad reasons for delayed adoption of FOCUS by anesthesiologists, including lack of training and potential unfamiliarity with when and how to incorporate FOCUS into anesthetic practice. As the phrases point of care ultrasound (POCUS), “FOCUS,” and “perioperative echocardiography” come into daily use, anesthesiologists have the opportunity to advance patient care and add value to their practice with ultrasound. This article will review the scope and limitations of FOCUS, and the current evidence for the use of FOCUS throughout the perioperative setting, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative arenas and relevant work-flow considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS\",\"volume\":\"60 3\",\"pages\":\"24-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AIA.0000000000000371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perioperative applications of focused cardiac ultrasound.
Over the past decade, transthoracic cardiac ultrasound as a bedside assessment tool has seen tremendous growth; it is unparalleled in value as a diagnostic modality that is portable and low in cost and risk to the patient. Advances in ultrasound technology and a growing body of scientific evidence supporting the role of diagnostic ultrasound assessment in all areas of anesthesiology practice have propelled this growth.With these advances, the utility of perioperative ultrasound has been solidified and incorporated into educational directives. Cardiac ultrasound has been added to the list of core competencies for anesthesiologists provided by governing bodies of medical education (Accreditation Council for GraduateMedical Education), and onto the content outline for anesthesiology board certification (American Board of Anesthesiology) in the United States. Despite the growing support for focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), there is still wide variation in the utilization of this technology in perioperative environments. There are myriad reasons for delayed adoption of FOCUS by anesthesiologists, including lack of training and potential unfamiliarity with when and how to incorporate FOCUS into anesthetic practice. As the phrases point of care ultrasound (POCUS), “FOCUS,” and “perioperative echocardiography” come into daily use, anesthesiologists have the opportunity to advance patient care and add value to their practice with ultrasound. This article will review the scope and limitations of FOCUS, and the current evidence for the use of FOCUS throughout the perioperative setting, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative arenas and relevant work-flow considerations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: International Anesthesiology Clinics is a valuable resource for any medical professional seeking to stay informed and up-to-date regarding developments in this dynamic specialty. Each hardbound issue of this quarterly publication presents a comprehensive review of a single topic in a new or changing area of anesthesiology. The timely, tightly focused review articles found in this publication give anesthesiologists the opportunity to benefit from the knowledge of leading experts in this rapidly changing field.
期刊最新文献
Surgical Enhanced Recovery: Where Are We Now? Added Value of Perioperative Care: Quality Measures and Outcomes Impacting Clinical Efficiency and Operations. Controversies in Perioperative Medication Management. Index. Special Populations in Ambulatory Surgery: Recreational Substance Use, Alternative Opioid Therapies, Social Challenges, and the Geriatric Patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1