Phillip Sherlock, Christine DiStefano, Brian Habing
{"title":"混合权值和预测因子分布对回归混合模型的影响。","authors":"Phillip Sherlock, Christine DiStefano, Brian Habing","doi":"10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Regression mixture models (RMMs) can be used to specifically test for and model differential effects in heterogeneous populations. Based on the results of the Aim 1 simulation study, enumeration conducted with constrained predictor means appears to be advantageous. Furthermore, researchers should estimate the K and K+1 unconditional models (chosen during initial enumeration), adding the C on X paths, to investigate the potential for model instability as well as the possibility that the models are misspecified because the underlying populations contain predictor variance differences in the subgroups. The Aim 2 simulation study explored the extent to which RMMs are robust to predictor variance differences. Although the coverage rates for the simulation conditions where the predictor variances differed across classes were not the nominal rate, parameter estimates were not biased even in the presence of moderate violations of this assumption.","PeriodicalId":21964,"journal":{"name":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"70-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Mixing Weights and Predictor Distributions on Regression Mixture Models.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Sherlock, Christine DiStefano, Brian Habing\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Regression mixture models (RMMs) can be used to specifically test for and model differential effects in heterogeneous populations. Based on the results of the Aim 1 simulation study, enumeration conducted with constrained predictor means appears to be advantageous. Furthermore, researchers should estimate the K and K+1 unconditional models (chosen during initial enumeration), adding the C on X paths, to investigate the potential for model instability as well as the possibility that the models are misspecified because the underlying populations contain predictor variance differences in the subgroups. The Aim 2 simulation study explored the extent to which RMMs are robust to predictor variance differences. Although the coverage rates for the simulation conditions where the predictor variances differed across classes were not the nominal rate, parameter estimates were not biased even in the presence of moderate violations of this assumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"70-85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2021.1932508","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Mixing Weights and Predictor Distributions on Regression Mixture Models.
ABSTRACT Regression mixture models (RMMs) can be used to specifically test for and model differential effects in heterogeneous populations. Based on the results of the Aim 1 simulation study, enumeration conducted with constrained predictor means appears to be advantageous. Furthermore, researchers should estimate the K and K+1 unconditional models (chosen during initial enumeration), adding the C on X paths, to investigate the potential for model instability as well as the possibility that the models are misspecified because the underlying populations contain predictor variance differences in the subgroups. The Aim 2 simulation study explored the extent to which RMMs are robust to predictor variance differences. Although the coverage rates for the simulation conditions where the predictor variances differed across classes were not the nominal rate, parameter estimates were not biased even in the presence of moderate violations of this assumption.
期刊介绍:
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal publishes refereed scholarly work from all academic disciplines interested in structural equation modeling. These disciplines include, but are not limited to, psychology, medicine, sociology, education, political science, economics, management, and business/marketing. Theoretical articles address new developments; applied articles deal with innovative structural equation modeling applications; the Teacher’s Corner provides instructional modules on aspects of structural equation modeling; book and software reviews examine new modeling information and techniques; and advertising alerts readers to new products. Comments on technical or substantive issues addressed in articles or reviews published in the journal are encouraged; comments are reviewed, and authors of the original works are invited to respond.