医护人员对青霉素过敏标签的态度。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Danish medical journal Pub Date : 2023-08-23
Ida Josephine Raun, Pernille Bach Tengberg, Tom Møller, Lene Heise Garvey
{"title":"医护人员对青霉素过敏标签的态度。","authors":"Ida Josephine Raun,&nbsp;Pernille Bach Tengberg,&nbsp;Tom Møller,&nbsp;Lene Heise Garvey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>About 10% of hospital inpatients are labelled with penicillin allergy in their electronic medical record (EMR). However, allergy is confirmed in less than 10% of these records. Consequently, 90% of patients are treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, contributing to antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to explore experiences and practices of healthcare professionals that may explain incorrect labelling of penicillin allergy in Denmark and elucidate any consequences hereof.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed to physicians and nurses in six hospital units in Copenhagen and via social media. The survey was active from 19 March to 1 May 2020. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics and by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 44.6%. The survey had 369 participants; 152 physicians and 217 nurses. Half of the physicians and one in every five nurses had experienced problems treating patients with a penicillin allergy label. Physicians reported limited trust in allergy labels, and labelling practices varied. The risk that patients may be truly allergic was the main reason for not removing labels (72%), and a precautionary principle was identified related to penicillin allergy labelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The penicillin allergy label is an independent factor of medication errors. Solutions to enhance patient safety may include education of physicians in allergy labelling, decision support, standardisation of the allergy registration in the various EMR systems used, and ideally also a national drug allergy register, which is accessible from all sectors.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare professionals' attitudes to penicillin allergy labels.\",\"authors\":\"Ida Josephine Raun,&nbsp;Pernille Bach Tengberg,&nbsp;Tom Møller,&nbsp;Lene Heise Garvey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>About 10% of hospital inpatients are labelled with penicillin allergy in their electronic medical record (EMR). However, allergy is confirmed in less than 10% of these records. Consequently, 90% of patients are treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, contributing to antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to explore experiences and practices of healthcare professionals that may explain incorrect labelling of penicillin allergy in Denmark and elucidate any consequences hereof.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was distributed to physicians and nurses in six hospital units in Copenhagen and via social media. The survey was active from 19 March to 1 May 2020. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics and by thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 44.6%. The survey had 369 participants; 152 physicians and 217 nurses. Half of the physicians and one in every five nurses had experienced problems treating patients with a penicillin allergy label. Physicians reported limited trust in allergy labels, and labelling practices varied. The risk that patients may be truly allergic was the main reason for not removing labels (72%), and a precautionary principle was identified related to penicillin allergy labelling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The penicillin allergy label is an independent factor of medication errors. Solutions to enhance patient safety may include education of physicians in allergy labelling, decision support, standardisation of the allergy registration in the various EMR systems used, and ideally also a national drug allergy register, which is accessible from all sectors.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Not relevant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"70 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:大约10%的住院病人在他们的电子病历(EMR)中被标记为青霉素过敏。然而,在这些记录中,确诊过敏的不到10%。因此,90%的患者接受广谱抗生素治疗,从而导致抗菌素耐药性。我们的目的是探讨经验和医疗保健专业人员的做法,可能解释不正确的标签青霉素过敏在丹麦和阐明任何后果。方法:通过社交媒体向哥本哈根6家医院的医生和护士进行电子调查。该调查于2020年3月19日至5月1日进行。使用描述性统计和专题分析对数据进行评估。结果:总有效率为44.6%。该调查共有369名参与者;医生152人,护士217人。一半的医生和五分之一的护士在治疗带有青霉素过敏标签的病人时遇到过问题。医生报告对过敏标签的信任有限,标签的做法也各不相同。患者可能真正过敏的风险是不移除标签的主要原因(72%),并确定了与青霉素过敏标签相关的预防原则。结论:青霉素过敏标签是导致用药错误的一个独立因素。加强患者安全的解决方案可能包括对医生进行过敏反应标签教育、决策支持、在使用的各种电子病历系统中进行过敏反应登记的标准化,最好还包括一个可从所有部门获取的国家药物过敏登记册。资金:没有。试验注册:不相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare professionals' attitudes to penicillin allergy labels.

Introduction: About 10% of hospital inpatients are labelled with penicillin allergy in their electronic medical record (EMR). However, allergy is confirmed in less than 10% of these records. Consequently, 90% of patients are treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, contributing to antimicrobial resistance. We aimed to explore experiences and practices of healthcare professionals that may explain incorrect labelling of penicillin allergy in Denmark and elucidate any consequences hereof.

Methods: An electronic survey was distributed to physicians and nurses in six hospital units in Copenhagen and via social media. The survey was active from 19 March to 1 May 2020. Data were assessed using descriptive statistics and by thematic analysis.

Results: The response rate was 44.6%. The survey had 369 participants; 152 physicians and 217 nurses. Half of the physicians and one in every five nurses had experienced problems treating patients with a penicillin allergy label. Physicians reported limited trust in allergy labels, and labelling practices varied. The risk that patients may be truly allergic was the main reason for not removing labels (72%), and a precautionary principle was identified related to penicillin allergy labelling.

Conclusions: The penicillin allergy label is an independent factor of medication errors. Solutions to enhance patient safety may include education of physicians in allergy labelling, decision support, standardisation of the allergy registration in the various EMR systems used, and ideally also a national drug allergy register, which is accessible from all sectors.

Funding: None.

Trial registration: Not relevant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Danish medical journal
Danish medical journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
78
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content. DMJ will publish the following articles: • Original articles • Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses • PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences • DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.
期刊最新文献
Compliance with endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors. Counselling and prescription of contraception related to pregnancy termination. Adrenomedullin in pulmonary hypertension. A novel acute basic palliation concept for patients without specialised palliative needs. Adjuvant steroid to percutaneous needle fasciotomy for Dupuytren's contracture. An RCT study protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1