在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用工具评估心理健康问题。

IF 1.1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1007/s11334-022-00510-1
Hamnah Rao, Meenu Gupta, Parul Agarwal, Surbhi Bhatia, Rajat Bhardwaj
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间使用工具评估心理健康问题。","authors":"Hamnah Rao, Meenu Gupta, Parul Agarwal, Surbhi Bhatia, Rajat Bhardwaj","doi":"10.1007/s11334-022-00510-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>COVID-19 has brought distress among people as pandemic has impacted the globe not only economically or physically, but also psychologically by degrading their mental health. Several research were done in the past which tried to capture these issues but post-covid situation needs to be critically handled and analyzed so that corrective measures for cure and support can be taken. The current work is an attempt to observe the mental health issues (anxiety and depression) that occurred during the lockdown by combining a few pre-designed questionnaires. The online survey included 244 respondents (females = 126, males = 118) and when we thoroughly examined gender, age group, and occupational activity as three main factors, the results showed that female students aged 21-35 were affected more than male students of the same age group. In this study, we used a 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) as a depression screening instrument and discovered that 225 out of total respondents were depressed. Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a self-administered anxiety tool, we found 103 responders with mild, 87 with moderate, 12 with severe, and 42 with no anxiety symptoms. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) showed the symptoms of mental disorders where 68 individuals had mild, 85 had moderate, 37 had moderately severe, 12 had severe, and 42 had no symptoms. With the help of multiple linear regression analysis, demographic data were evaluated, and later results were compared between GDS-4, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 using correlation coefficients. This will help practitioners and individuals to focus on their physiological health and adopt diagnostic measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":44465,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental health issues assessment using tools during COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Hamnah Rao, Meenu Gupta, Parul Agarwal, Surbhi Bhatia, Rajat Bhardwaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11334-022-00510-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>COVID-19 has brought distress among people as pandemic has impacted the globe not only economically or physically, but also psychologically by degrading their mental health. Several research were done in the past which tried to capture these issues but post-covid situation needs to be critically handled and analyzed so that corrective measures for cure and support can be taken. The current work is an attempt to observe the mental health issues (anxiety and depression) that occurred during the lockdown by combining a few pre-designed questionnaires. The online survey included 244 respondents (females = 126, males = 118) and when we thoroughly examined gender, age group, and occupational activity as three main factors, the results showed that female students aged 21-35 were affected more than male students of the same age group. In this study, we used a 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) as a depression screening instrument and discovered that 225 out of total respondents were depressed. Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a self-administered anxiety tool, we found 103 responders with mild, 87 with moderate, 12 with severe, and 42 with no anxiety symptoms. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) showed the symptoms of mental disorders where 68 individuals had mild, 85 had moderate, 37 had moderately severe, 12 had severe, and 42 had no symptoms. With the help of multiple linear regression analysis, demographic data were evaluated, and later results were compared between GDS-4, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 using correlation coefficients. This will help practitioners and individuals to focus on their physiological health and adopt diagnostic measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9742669/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00510-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-022-00510-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19 给人们带来了痛苦,因为该流行病不仅在经济上或身体上对全球造成了影响,还在心理上损害了人们的精神健康。过去曾做过一些研究,试图捕捉这些问题,但对 COVID 后的情况需要进行批判性的处理和分析,以便采取正确的治疗和支持措施。目前的工作是通过结合一些预先设计的问卷,尝试观察在封锁期间出现的心理健康问题(焦虑和抑郁)。在线调查包括 244 名受访者(女性 = 126 人,男性 = 118 人),当我们深入研究性别、年龄组和职业活动这三个主要因素时,结果显示 21-35 岁的女学生比同年龄组的男学生受到的影响更大。在这项研究中,我们使用了 4 项老年抑郁量表(GDS-4)作为抑郁筛查工具,发现受访者中有 225 人患有抑郁症。我们使用自制的焦虑工具 "广泛性焦虑症(GAD-7)",发现 103 名受访者有轻度焦虑症状,87 名受访者有中度焦虑症状,12 名受访者有重度焦虑症状,42 名受访者没有焦虑症状。患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)显示,68 人有轻度精神障碍症状,85 人有中度精神障碍症状,37 人有中重度精神障碍症状,12 人有重度精神障碍症状,42 人无精神障碍症状。在多元线性回归分析的帮助下,对人口统计学数据进行了评估,随后使用相关系数对 GDS-4、GAD-7 和 PHQ-9 的结果进行了比较。这将有助于医生和个人关注生理健康并采取诊断措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental health issues assessment using tools during COVID-19 pandemic.

COVID-19 has brought distress among people as pandemic has impacted the globe not only economically or physically, but also psychologically by degrading their mental health. Several research were done in the past which tried to capture these issues but post-covid situation needs to be critically handled and analyzed so that corrective measures for cure and support can be taken. The current work is an attempt to observe the mental health issues (anxiety and depression) that occurred during the lockdown by combining a few pre-designed questionnaires. The online survey included 244 respondents (females = 126, males = 118) and when we thoroughly examined gender, age group, and occupational activity as three main factors, the results showed that female students aged 21-35 were affected more than male students of the same age group. In this study, we used a 4-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-4) as a depression screening instrument and discovered that 225 out of total respondents were depressed. Using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), a self-administered anxiety tool, we found 103 responders with mild, 87 with moderate, 12 with severe, and 42 with no anxiety symptoms. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) showed the symptoms of mental disorders where 68 individuals had mild, 85 had moderate, 37 had moderately severe, 12 had severe, and 42 had no symptoms. With the help of multiple linear regression analysis, demographic data were evaluated, and later results were compared between GDS-4, GAD-7, and PHQ-9 using correlation coefficients. This will help practitioners and individuals to focus on their physiological health and adopt diagnostic measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering: A NASA Journal addresses issues and innovations in Systems Engineering, Systems Integration, Software Engineering, Software Development and other related areas that are specifically of interest to NASA. The journal includes peer-reviewed world-class technical papers on topics of research, development and practice related to NASA''s missions and projects, topics of interest to NASA for future use, and topics describing problem areas for NASA together with potential solutions. Papers that do not address issues related to NASA are of course very welcome, provided that they address topics that NASA might like to consider for the future. Papers are solicited from NASA and government employees, contractors, NASA-supported academic and industrial partners, and non-NASA-supported academics and industrialists both in the USA and worldwide. The journal includes updates on NASA innovations, articles on NASA initiatives, papers looking at educational activities, and a State-of-the-Art section that gives an overview of specific topic areas in a comprehensive format written by an expert in the field.
期刊最新文献
Convolutional neural network-based classifiers for liver tumor detection using computed tomography scans Preface to the VECoS 2020 & 2021 special issue of ISSE Timeshifting strategies for carbon-efficient long-running large language model training Eliciting context-oriented NFR constraints and conflicts in robotic systems Nuclei-Net: a multi-stage fusion model for nuclei segmentation in microscopy images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1