系统整合的概念已经过时了吗?识别和评估基础系统整合的前提。

Faculty reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12703/r/11-33
Morris Moscovitch, Asaf Gilboa
{"title":"系统整合的概念已经过时了吗?识别和评估基础系统整合的前提。","authors":"Morris Moscovitch,&nbsp;Asaf Gilboa","doi":"10.12703/r/11-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation based on evidence from research on humans and other animals. We use the principle that changes in neural representation over time and experience are accompanied by corresponding changes in psychological representations, and vice versa, to argue that each of the premises underlying traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation is found wanting. One solution is to modify or abandon the premises or theories and models. This is reflected in moderated models of systems consolidation that emphasize the early role of the HPC in training neocortical memories until they stabilize. The fault, however, may lie in the very concept of systems consolidation and its defining feature. We propose that the concept be replaced by one of memory systems reorganization, which does not carry the theoretical baggage of systems consolidation and is flexible enough to capture the dynamic nature of memory from inception to very long-term retention and retrieval at a psychological and neural level. The term \"memory system reorganization\" implies that memory traces are not fixed, even after they are presumably consolidated. Memories can continue to change as a result of experience and interactions among memory systems across the lifetime. As will become clear, hippocampal training of neocortical memories is only one type of such interaction, and not always the most important one, even at inception. We end by suggesting some principles of memory reorganization that can help guide research on dynamic memory processes that capture corresponding changes in memory at the psychological and neural levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":73016,"journal":{"name":"Faculty reviews","volume":"11 ","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720899/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation.\",\"authors\":\"Morris Moscovitch,&nbsp;Asaf Gilboa\",\"doi\":\"10.12703/r/11-33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation based on evidence from research on humans and other animals. We use the principle that changes in neural representation over time and experience are accompanied by corresponding changes in psychological representations, and vice versa, to argue that each of the premises underlying traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation is found wanting. One solution is to modify or abandon the premises or theories and models. This is reflected in moderated models of systems consolidation that emphasize the early role of the HPC in training neocortical memories until they stabilize. The fault, however, may lie in the very concept of systems consolidation and its defining feature. We propose that the concept be replaced by one of memory systems reorganization, which does not carry the theoretical baggage of systems consolidation and is flexible enough to capture the dynamic nature of memory from inception to very long-term retention and retrieval at a psychological and neural level. The term \\\"memory system reorganization\\\" implies that memory traces are not fixed, even after they are presumably consolidated. Memories can continue to change as a result of experience and interactions among memory systems across the lifetime. As will become clear, hippocampal training of neocortical memories is only one type of such interaction, and not always the most important one, even at inception. We end by suggesting some principles of memory reorganization that can help guide research on dynamic memory processes that capture corresponding changes in memory at the psychological and neural levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9720899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faculty reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12703/r/11-33\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12703/r/11-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

系统巩固通常被认为是一种神经结构,由记忆表征从海马体(HPC)到其他结构(主要是新皮层)的时间依赖性变化所定义。在这里,我们根据对人类和其他动物的研究证据,识别和评估传统或标准模型和系统整合理论的显性和隐性前提。随着时间和经验的推移,神经表征的变化伴随着心理表征的相应变化,反之亦然,我们使用这一原则来论证传统或标准模型和系统巩固理论的每个前提都存在不足。一种解决办法是修改或放弃前提或理论和模型。这反映在系统巩固的适度模型中,该模型强调HPC在训练新皮层记忆中的早期作用,直到它们稳定下来。然而,错误可能在于系统整合的概念及其定义特征。我们建议用记忆系统重组的概念来取代这一概念,它不携带系统巩固的理论包袱,并且足够灵活,可以在心理和神经水平上捕捉记忆从开始到非常长期的保留和检索的动态本质。术语“记忆系统重组”意味着记忆痕迹不是固定的,即使在它们可能被巩固之后。由于经历和记忆系统之间的相互作用,记忆可以在一生中不断改变。我们将会清楚地看到,海马体对新皮层记忆的训练只是这种相互作用的一种,而且并不总是最重要的一种,即使在开始时也是如此。最后,我们提出了一些记忆重组的原则,这些原则可以帮助指导动态记忆过程的研究,从而在心理和神经层面上捕捉记忆的相应变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Has the concept of systems consolidation outlived its usefulness? Identification and evaluation of premises underlying systems consolidation.

Systems consolidation has mostly been treated as a neural construct defined by the time-dependent change in memory representation from the hippocampus (HPC) to other structures, primarily the neocortex. Here, we identify and evaluate the explicit and implicit premises that underlie traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation based on evidence from research on humans and other animals. We use the principle that changes in neural representation over time and experience are accompanied by corresponding changes in psychological representations, and vice versa, to argue that each of the premises underlying traditional or standard models and theories of systems consolidation is found wanting. One solution is to modify or abandon the premises or theories and models. This is reflected in moderated models of systems consolidation that emphasize the early role of the HPC in training neocortical memories until they stabilize. The fault, however, may lie in the very concept of systems consolidation and its defining feature. We propose that the concept be replaced by one of memory systems reorganization, which does not carry the theoretical baggage of systems consolidation and is flexible enough to capture the dynamic nature of memory from inception to very long-term retention and retrieval at a psychological and neural level. The term "memory system reorganization" implies that memory traces are not fixed, even after they are presumably consolidated. Memories can continue to change as a result of experience and interactions among memory systems across the lifetime. As will become clear, hippocampal training of neocortical memories is only one type of such interaction, and not always the most important one, even at inception. We end by suggesting some principles of memory reorganization that can help guide research on dynamic memory processes that capture corresponding changes in memory at the psychological and neural levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What’s New in The Diagnosis and Treatment of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI)? ‘All About’ Extremophiles Recent advances in the understanding of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Recent advances in understanding TCR signaling: a synaptic perspective. Recent advances in understanding Alzheimer's Disease: diagnosis and management strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1