The clinical utility of the LENT score in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Introduction: In malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), useful tools are needed to predict survival. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the LENT score, and demonstrate the performance of the LENT score in predicting survival in patients with MPM.

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective, observational single-center study. Sixty-nine patients diagnosed with MPM who had pleural effusion (March 2009-December 2020) were divided into groups according to their LENT score and compared. Median survivals were estimated and compared according to the LENT score and parameters of the LENT score.

Result: Fifty-four patients were in the low-LENT score group, 15 patients were in the moderate-LENT score group, and there were no patients in the highLENT score group. The two groups had similar characteristics in terms of age, gender, and histological subtype distribution. There were no patients with ECOG-PS 0 in the moderate-LENT score group. Serum neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (NLR), pleural lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), patients with serum NLR> 9, and patients with pleural LDH> 1500 were significantly higher in the moderate-LENT score group (p= 0.002, 0.001, <0.01, <0.01, respectively). Fifty patients had died during a median follow-up of 38.6 ± 6.5 (95% CI= 25.84-51.41) months. The median survival for all patients was 28.63 ± 3.2 (95% CI= 22.33-34.92) months, higher than the original study. It was 30.97 ± 2 months in the low-LENT score group, and 20.7 ± 3.4 months in the moderate-LENT score group (p= 0.98). The median survival for patients with pleural LDH<1500 was significantly higher than for patients with pleural LDH> 1500 (p= 0.006) (30.97 vs. 16.73 months), while ECOG-PS (0 vs. 1) and NLR (<9 vs. >9) showed no differences.

Conclusions: The survival in our resultant groups was higher than those reported in the original study, and the LENT score had no discriminatory ability for predicting survival in patients with MPM. We nevertheless believe that before reaching more definite conclusions, further large-scale multicenter prospective studies are needed to better define the clinical utility of the LENT score.