鼻管固定:儿科住院患者的随机对照试验。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Rehabilitation Nursing Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392
Heidi L McNeely, Debra Quackenbush, Samantha Bothwell, Ashley Banks, John T Brinton
{"title":"鼻管固定:儿科住院患者的随机对照试验。","authors":"Heidi L McNeely,&nbsp;Debra Quackenbush,&nbsp;Samantha Bothwell,&nbsp;Ashley Banks,&nbsp;John T Brinton","doi":"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare accidental dislodgement rates of nasal gastric tubes secured with standard methods or a nasal tube securement device in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants ( n = 43) were randomized into standard securement or nasal tube securement device using block randomization to control for age and diagnosis. Surveys were collected from staff and caregivers on device ease of use and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a similar number of tube dislodgements for patients in the nasal tube securement device group ( n = 6) and the standard practice group ( n = 7). The median hospital length of stay was higher for the standard practice group (13 days vs. 9 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of the nasal tube securement device did not significantly decrease the rate of tube dislodgements compared with standard practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance to rehabilitation nursing: </strong>The study provides information for pediatric rehabilitation nurses in choosing securement options for nasal gastric tubes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49631,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Nursing","volume":"48 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nasal Tube Securement: Randomized Controlled Trial in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Heidi L McNeely,&nbsp;Debra Quackenbush,&nbsp;Samantha Bothwell,&nbsp;Ashley Banks,&nbsp;John T Brinton\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare accidental dislodgement rates of nasal gastric tubes secured with standard methods or a nasal tube securement device in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants ( n = 43) were randomized into standard securement or nasal tube securement device using block randomization to control for age and diagnosis. Surveys were collected from staff and caregivers on device ease of use and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a similar number of tube dislodgements for patients in the nasal tube securement device group ( n = 6) and the standard practice group ( n = 7). The median hospital length of stay was higher for the standard practice group (13 days vs. 9 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of the nasal tube securement device did not significantly decrease the rate of tube dislodgements compared with standard practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance to rehabilitation nursing: </strong>The study provides information for pediatric rehabilitation nurses in choosing securement options for nasal gastric tubes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"5-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000392","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较儿科患者使用标准方法或鼻管固定装置固定鼻胃管的意外移位率。设计:采用随机对照试验。方法:采用分组随机法将43名参与者随机分为标准固定组和鼻管固定组,以控制年龄和诊断。从员工和护理人员那里收集了关于设备易用性和满意度的调查。结果:鼻管固定装置组(n = 6)和标准实践组(n = 7)患者的管脱位数量相似。标准实践组的住院时间中位数更高(13天比9天)。结论:与标准做法相比,使用鼻管固定装置并没有显著降低鼻管脱位率。康复护理的临床意义:本研究为儿科康复护士选择鼻胃管固定方案提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nasal Tube Securement: Randomized Controlled Trial in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare accidental dislodgement rates of nasal gastric tubes secured with standard methods or a nasal tube securement device in pediatric patients.

Design: A randomized controlled trial was conducted.

Methods: Participants ( n = 43) were randomized into standard securement or nasal tube securement device using block randomization to control for age and diagnosis. Surveys were collected from staff and caregivers on device ease of use and satisfaction.

Results: There were a similar number of tube dislodgements for patients in the nasal tube securement device group ( n = 6) and the standard practice group ( n = 7). The median hospital length of stay was higher for the standard practice group (13 days vs. 9 days).

Conclusion: Use of the nasal tube securement device did not significantly decrease the rate of tube dislodgements compared with standard practice.

Clinical relevance to rehabilitation nursing: The study provides information for pediatric rehabilitation nurses in choosing securement options for nasal gastric tubes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitation Nursing
Rehabilitation Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Nursing is a refereed, award-winning publication and is the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. Its purpose is to provide rehabilitation professionals with high-quality articles with a primary focus on rehabilitation nursing. Topics range from administration and research to education and clinical topics, and nursing perspectives, with continuing education opportunities in every issue. Articles range from administration and research to education and clinical topics; nursing perspectives, resource reviews, and product information; and continuing education opportunities in every issue.
期刊最新文献
Implementing Remote Patient Monitoring of Physical Activity in Clinical Practice. The Role of Nursing Staff Regarding Goal Setting and Achieving in Geriatric Rehabilitation: A Focus Group Study. The Effect of Motivational Interview-Based Counseling in Individuals With Amputation: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Turkey. The Value of Connectedness. Efficacy of Rapid Rehabilitation Nursing in Postoperative Care in China: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1