疫苗获取不公平:全球应对COVID-19大流行的失败。

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Salud Colectiva Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.18294/sc.2022.4190
Antonio Ugalde, Fernando Hellmann, Núria Homedes
{"title":"疫苗获取不公平:全球应对COVID-19大流行的失败。","authors":"Antonio Ugalde,&nbsp;Fernando Hellmann,&nbsp;Núria Homedes","doi":"10.18294/sc.2022.4190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article summarizes the strategies used to rapidly develop COVID-19 vaccines and distribute them globally, with an emphasis on vaccines developed in western nations. It is based on interviews and information gathered regarding the response to the pandemic, both from international organizations and official documents from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico. While vaccine development has been hailed as successful, their global distribution has been highly unequal. We look at how the pandemic succeeded in mobilizing large quantities of government resources, and how citizens volunteered their bodies so that clinical trials could be completed quickly. However, patents prevented the expansion of manufacturing capacity, and the governments of a few wealthy countries prioritized the protection - and in some cases overprotection - of their citizens at the expense of protecting the rest of world's population. Among the major beneficiaries of the global response to the pandemic are the leading vaccine companies, their executives, and investors. The article concludes with some of the lessons learned in this process.</p>","PeriodicalId":44640,"journal":{"name":"Salud Colectiva","volume":"18 ","pages":"e4190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inequity in access to vaccines: the failure of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Ugalde,&nbsp;Fernando Hellmann,&nbsp;Núria Homedes\",\"doi\":\"10.18294/sc.2022.4190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article summarizes the strategies used to rapidly develop COVID-19 vaccines and distribute them globally, with an emphasis on vaccines developed in western nations. It is based on interviews and information gathered regarding the response to the pandemic, both from international organizations and official documents from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico. While vaccine development has been hailed as successful, their global distribution has been highly unequal. We look at how the pandemic succeeded in mobilizing large quantities of government resources, and how citizens volunteered their bodies so that clinical trials could be completed quickly. However, patents prevented the expansion of manufacturing capacity, and the governments of a few wealthy countries prioritized the protection - and in some cases overprotection - of their citizens at the expense of protecting the rest of world's population. Among the major beneficiaries of the global response to the pandemic are the leading vaccine companies, their executives, and investors. The article concludes with some of the lessons learned in this process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salud Colectiva\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"e4190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salud Colectiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2022.4190\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Colectiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2022.4190","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文总结了快速开发COVID-19疫苗并在全球范围内分发的策略,重点介绍了西方国家开发的疫苗。它基于采访和从国际组织和巴西、阿根廷、哥伦比亚、秘鲁和墨西哥的官方文件收集的关于大流行应对的信息。虽然疫苗开发被誉为成功,但它们在全球的分布却极不平等。我们看到大流行如何成功地调动了大量政府资源,以及公民如何自愿献出自己的身体,以便迅速完成临床试验。然而,专利阻碍了制造能力的扩张,少数富裕国家的政府优先保护——在某些情况下过度保护——他们的公民,而牺牲了保护世界其他人口的利益。全球大流行应对措施的主要受益者包括主要疫苗公司及其高管和投资者。文章最后总结了在此过程中获得的一些经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inequity in access to vaccines: the failure of the global response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

This article summarizes the strategies used to rapidly develop COVID-19 vaccines and distribute them globally, with an emphasis on vaccines developed in western nations. It is based on interviews and information gathered regarding the response to the pandemic, both from international organizations and official documents from Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Peru, and Mexico. While vaccine development has been hailed as successful, their global distribution has been highly unequal. We look at how the pandemic succeeded in mobilizing large quantities of government resources, and how citizens volunteered their bodies so that clinical trials could be completed quickly. However, patents prevented the expansion of manufacturing capacity, and the governments of a few wealthy countries prioritized the protection - and in some cases overprotection - of their citizens at the expense of protecting the rest of world's population. Among the major beneficiaries of the global response to the pandemic are the leading vaccine companies, their executives, and investors. The article concludes with some of the lessons learned in this process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salud Colectiva
Salud Colectiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Salud Colectiva publica análisis y resultados de investigaciones, debates entre diferentes autores, artículos de opinión, conferencias, documentos y reseñas históricas, en español, que problematicen el campo de la Salud Colectiva desde diferentes disciplinas y saberes.
期刊最新文献
[Barriers and strategies for healthcare accessibility for trans people in Cordoba, Argentina]. [Racial inequality in the production of fresh vegetables and cut flowers in Argentina: an analysis in Greater La Plata]. [Use of psychotropic drugs among Indigenous and Quilombola communities in Brazil]. [Experiences and subjective transformations: suffering and coercion in the use of psychotropic drugs in psychiatric treatment in Chile]. [Racism and mental health in indigenous youth living in the Metropolitan Area of Oaxaca, Mexico].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1