验证产后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(GROP)筛查标准。

Q2 Medicine Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-09-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01
Kaveh Fadakar, Haider Abbas, Sahel Soltani Shahgoli, Sonal Tuli, Afsar Farahani, Marjan Imani Fooladi, Naeeme Taslimi Taleghani, Shaghayegh Esfandiarifard, Ramak Roohipourmoallai, Samaneh Davoudi, Jinghua Chen, Maryam Khoshnood Shariati, Reza Karkhaneh, Nazanin Ebrahimiadib
{"title":"验证产后生长和早产儿视网膜病变(GROP)筛查标准。","authors":"Kaveh Fadakar, Haider Abbas, Sahel Soltani Shahgoli, Sonal Tuli, Afsar Farahani, Marjan Imani Fooladi, Naeeme Taslimi Taleghani, Shaghayegh Esfandiarifard, Ramak Roohipourmoallai, Samaneh Davoudi, Jinghua Chen, Maryam Khoshnood Shariati, Reza Karkhaneh, Nazanin Ebrahimiadib","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in infants. The Postnatal Growth and ROP (G-ROP) study proposed new screening criteria for ROP. This study aimed to validate the G-ROP screening criteria in a group of Iranian premature infants who were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for at least 40 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we extracted the data pertaining to infants admitted to the NICU from January 2020 to December 2021. We screened all the included infants for ROP based on the Iranian national screening criteria. We applied the G-ROP criteria to our study population, and if no criterion was met, the infant was exempted from ROP screening. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP guidelines for ROP detection, along with its capacity for predicting the requirement for ROP treatment. Moreover, we compared the G-ROP guidelines with the Iranian and North American guidelines for ROP screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 premature infants with complete datasets were included: 130 had ROP, of whom 61 were treated. There were 109 female infants (65.7%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) birth weight and gestational age were 1080 (256) g and 28.28 (1.97) weeks, respectively. Applying the G-ROP criteria, 127 of 130 infants with ROP were identified (sensitivity, 97.69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.11% - 100%), and of 36 infants without ROP, three were correctly excluded (specificity, 8.33%; 95% CI, 0% - 17.36%). The G-ROP criteria did not fail to identify infants who required treatment for ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.29 - 100) and had a specificity of 8.69% (95% CI, 2.04% - 15.34%). Although the Iranian and North American criteria had 100% sensitivity for infants with any stage of ROP, they could not detect infants without ROP (0% specificity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The G-ROP screening criteria had a sensitivity of 100% in identifying infants requiring treatment for ROP in our high-risk group; however, specificity was not sufficiently high. Further studies with larger numbers of referred infants could confirm a decrease in the burden of retinal examinations using these criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":36524,"journal":{"name":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","volume":"11 2","pages":"77-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/a1/mehdiophth-11-077.PMC10445302.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (GROP) screening criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Kaveh Fadakar, Haider Abbas, Sahel Soltani Shahgoli, Sonal Tuli, Afsar Farahani, Marjan Imani Fooladi, Naeeme Taslimi Taleghani, Shaghayegh Esfandiarifard, Ramak Roohipourmoallai, Samaneh Davoudi, Jinghua Chen, Maryam Khoshnood Shariati, Reza Karkhaneh, Nazanin Ebrahimiadib\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in infants. The Postnatal Growth and ROP (G-ROP) study proposed new screening criteria for ROP. This study aimed to validate the G-ROP screening criteria in a group of Iranian premature infants who were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for at least 40 days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, we extracted the data pertaining to infants admitted to the NICU from January 2020 to December 2021. We screened all the included infants for ROP based on the Iranian national screening criteria. We applied the G-ROP criteria to our study population, and if no criterion was met, the infant was exempted from ROP screening. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP guidelines for ROP detection, along with its capacity for predicting the requirement for ROP treatment. Moreover, we compared the G-ROP guidelines with the Iranian and North American guidelines for ROP screening.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 premature infants with complete datasets were included: 130 had ROP, of whom 61 were treated. There were 109 female infants (65.7%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) birth weight and gestational age were 1080 (256) g and 28.28 (1.97) weeks, respectively. Applying the G-ROP criteria, 127 of 130 infants with ROP were identified (sensitivity, 97.69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.11% - 100%), and of 36 infants without ROP, three were correctly excluded (specificity, 8.33%; 95% CI, 0% - 17.36%). The G-ROP criteria did not fail to identify infants who required treatment for ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.29 - 100) and had a specificity of 8.69% (95% CI, 2.04% - 15.34%). Although the Iranian and North American criteria had 100% sensitivity for infants with any stage of ROP, they could not detect infants without ROP (0% specificity).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The G-ROP screening criteria had a sensitivity of 100% in identifying infants requiring treatment for ROP in our high-risk group; however, specificity was not sufficiently high. Further studies with larger numbers of referred infants could confirm a decrease in the burden of retinal examinations using these criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"77-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e8/a1/mehdiophth-11-077.PMC10445302.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Hypothesis, Discovery, and Innovation in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早产儿视网膜病变(ROP早产儿视网膜病变(ROP)是导致婴儿不可逆性失明的主要原因。产后生长与早产儿视网膜病变(G-ROP)研究提出了新的早产儿视网膜病变筛查标准。本研究的目的是在一组在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)接受治疗至少 40 天的伊朗早产儿中验证 G-ROP 筛查标准:在这项回顾性研究中,我们提取了 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间入住新生儿重症监护室的婴儿的相关数据。我们根据伊朗国家筛查标准对所有纳入的婴儿进行了 ROP 筛查。我们将 G-ROP 标准应用于研究人群,如果不符合标准,则婴儿免于接受 ROP 筛查。我们确定了 G-ROP 指南在检测早产儿视网膜病变方面的灵敏度和特异性,以及预测早产儿视网膜病变治疗需求的能力。此外,我们还将 G-ROP 指南与伊朗和北美的 ROP 筛查指南进行了比较:结果:共纳入了 166 名具有完整数据集的早产儿:其中 130 例患有早产儿视网膜病变,61 例接受了治疗。其中有 109 名女婴(65.7%)。出生体重和胎龄的平均值(标准差 [SD])分别为 1080 (256) 克和 28.28 (1.97) 周。根据 G-ROP 标准,130 名婴儿中有 127 名被确定为患有 ROP(灵敏度为 97.69%;95% 置信区间 [CI],95.11% - 100%),36 名无 ROP 的婴儿中有 3 名被正确排除(特异性为 8.33%;95% 置信区间,0% - 17.36%)。G-ROP 标准也能识别出需要治疗 ROP 的婴儿(灵敏度为 100%;95% CI 为 98.29 - 100),特异性为 8.69%(95% CI 为 2.04% - 15.34%)。尽管伊朗和北美的标准对任何阶段的早产儿视网膜病变婴儿的敏感性均为 100%,但它们无法检测出未患早产儿视网膜病变的婴儿(特异性为 0%):结论:G-ROP 筛查标准在识别高危人群中需要治疗 ROP 的婴儿方面具有 100% 的灵敏度,但特异性不够高。通过对更多转诊婴儿进行进一步研究,可以证实使用这些标准可以减少视网膜检查的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (GROP) screening criteria.

Background: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a leading cause of irreversible blindness in infants. The Postnatal Growth and ROP (G-ROP) study proposed new screening criteria for ROP. This study aimed to validate the G-ROP screening criteria in a group of Iranian premature infants who were treated in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for at least 40 days.

Methods: In this retrospective study, we extracted the data pertaining to infants admitted to the NICU from January 2020 to December 2021. We screened all the included infants for ROP based on the Iranian national screening criteria. We applied the G-ROP criteria to our study population, and if no criterion was met, the infant was exempted from ROP screening. We determined the sensitivity and specificity of the G-ROP guidelines for ROP detection, along with its capacity for predicting the requirement for ROP treatment. Moreover, we compared the G-ROP guidelines with the Iranian and North American guidelines for ROP screening.

Results: A total of 166 premature infants with complete datasets were included: 130 had ROP, of whom 61 were treated. There were 109 female infants (65.7%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) birth weight and gestational age were 1080 (256) g and 28.28 (1.97) weeks, respectively. Applying the G-ROP criteria, 127 of 130 infants with ROP were identified (sensitivity, 97.69%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 95.11% - 100%), and of 36 infants without ROP, three were correctly excluded (specificity, 8.33%; 95% CI, 0% - 17.36%). The G-ROP criteria did not fail to identify infants who required treatment for ROP (sensitivity, 100%; 95% CI, 98.29 - 100) and had a specificity of 8.69% (95% CI, 2.04% - 15.34%). Although the Iranian and North American criteria had 100% sensitivity for infants with any stage of ROP, they could not detect infants without ROP (0% specificity).

Conclusions: The G-ROP screening criteria had a sensitivity of 100% in identifying infants requiring treatment for ROP in our high-risk group; however, specificity was not sufficiently high. Further studies with larger numbers of referred infants could confirm a decrease in the burden of retinal examinations using these criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Crocus sativus (saffron) and age-related macular degeneration. Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis. Intraretinal hyperreflective line: potential biomarker in various retinal disorders. Multifocal electroretinogram changes after panretinal photocoagulation in early proliferative diabetic retinopathy. One-year outcomes after intraocular collamer lens implantation in hyperopic astigmatism: a retrospective single-center study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1