急性淋巴细胞白血病可测量残留病:多低才算足够低?

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.beha.2022.101407
Aaron C. Logan
{"title":"急性淋巴细胞白血病可测量残留病:多低才算足够低?","authors":"Aaron C. Logan","doi":"10.1016/j.beha.2022.101407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a well-established clinical tool used to risk stratify patients during the course of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or transplant therapy. As technologies evolve, the sensitivity for quantifying exceptionally low disease burden using either next generation sequencing (NGS) or next generation flow cytometry (NGF) has improved. It is now possible to detect MRD and quantify it precisely in patients who would previously have been deemed MRD negative by older, lower sensitivity methods. Persistence or recurrence of ALL disease burden above 10<sup>−4</sup> (0.01%) is accepted as the minimum threshold for making clinical decisions, but with NGS and NGF, clinicians now confront decision-making with disease burdens sometimes quantified to as low as 10<sup>−6</sup> (0.0001%, or one leukemia cell in a million leukocytes). Emerging data suggest these higher sensitivity methods are superior for identifying patients at lowest risk for relapse, but it remains controversial whether to institute therapies such as blinatumomab or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells or move patients to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) when they have quantifiable disease burden less than 10<sup>−4</sup>. With additional evidence to facilitate integration of highly sensitive MRD quantification into clinical care and to contextualize MRD within the genotype of individual patients, it will likely be increasingly possible to identify patients able to avoid alloHCT and potentially even de-escalate therapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8744,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","volume":"35 4","pages":"Article 101407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692622000627/pdfft?md5=3eedb7a2c99ca8220459819175d732fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1521692622000627-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurable residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: How low is low enough?\",\"authors\":\"Aaron C. Logan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.beha.2022.101407\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a well-established clinical tool used to risk stratify patients during the course of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or transplant therapy. As technologies evolve, the sensitivity for quantifying exceptionally low disease burden using either next generation sequencing (NGS) or next generation flow cytometry (NGF) has improved. It is now possible to detect MRD and quantify it precisely in patients who would previously have been deemed MRD negative by older, lower sensitivity methods. Persistence or recurrence of ALL disease burden above 10<sup>−4</sup> (0.01%) is accepted as the minimum threshold for making clinical decisions, but with NGS and NGF, clinicians now confront decision-making with disease burdens sometimes quantified to as low as 10<sup>−6</sup> (0.0001%, or one leukemia cell in a million leukocytes). Emerging data suggest these higher sensitivity methods are superior for identifying patients at lowest risk for relapse, but it remains controversial whether to institute therapies such as blinatumomab or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells or move patients to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) when they have quantifiable disease burden less than 10<sup>−4</sup>. With additional evidence to facilitate integration of highly sensitive MRD quantification into clinical care and to contextualize MRD within the genotype of individual patients, it will likely be increasingly possible to identify patients able to avoid alloHCT and potentially even de-escalate therapy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101407\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692622000627/pdfft?md5=3eedb7a2c99ca8220459819175d732fb&pid=1-s2.0-S1521692622000627-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692622000627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521692622000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)中可测量残余疾病(MRD)的量化是一种成熟的临床工具,用于在化疗、免疫治疗和/或移植治疗过程中对患者进行风险分层。随着技术的发展,使用下一代测序(NGS)或下一代流式细胞术(NGF)对极低疾病负担进行量化的灵敏度得到了提高。现在有可能检测到MRD,并精确地量化以前被旧的、低灵敏度的方法视为MRD阴性的患者。ALL疾病负担持续或复发高于10−4(0.01%)被认为是做出临床决策的最低阈值,但对于NGS和NGF,临床医生现在面临的疾病负担有时被量化为低至10−6(0.0001%,或百万分之一白血病细胞)。新出现的数据表明,这些高灵敏度的方法在识别复发风险最低的患者方面具有优势,但当可量化的疾病负担小于10−4时,是否应该采用blinatumomab或嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞等治疗方法或将患者转移到异体造血细胞移植(alloHCT)仍然存在争议。随着更多的证据有助于将高敏感性MRD量化整合到临床护理中,并将MRD与个体患者的基因型联系起来,识别能够避免同种异体hct甚至可能降级治疗的患者将越来越有可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurable residual disease in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: How low is low enough?

Quantification of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a well-established clinical tool used to risk stratify patients during the course of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and/or transplant therapy. As technologies evolve, the sensitivity for quantifying exceptionally low disease burden using either next generation sequencing (NGS) or next generation flow cytometry (NGF) has improved. It is now possible to detect MRD and quantify it precisely in patients who would previously have been deemed MRD negative by older, lower sensitivity methods. Persistence or recurrence of ALL disease burden above 10−4 (0.01%) is accepted as the minimum threshold for making clinical decisions, but with NGS and NGF, clinicians now confront decision-making with disease burdens sometimes quantified to as low as 10−6 (0.0001%, or one leukemia cell in a million leukocytes). Emerging data suggest these higher sensitivity methods are superior for identifying patients at lowest risk for relapse, but it remains controversial whether to institute therapies such as blinatumomab or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells or move patients to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) when they have quantifiable disease burden less than 10−4. With additional evidence to facilitate integration of highly sensitive MRD quantification into clinical care and to contextualize MRD within the genotype of individual patients, it will likely be increasingly possible to identify patients able to avoid alloHCT and potentially even de-escalate therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology publishes review articles integrating the results from the latest original research articles into practical, evidence-based review articles. These articles seek to address the key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach which focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known, covering the spectrum of clinical and laboratory haematological practice and research. Although most reviews are invited, the Editor welcomes suggestions from potential authors.
期刊最新文献
Erratum to “Special issue 37.2 and 37.3 Genetics and Function of HLA and immune-related genes in transplantation and cellular immunotherapy” [Best Pract Res Clin Haematol (2024) 101588] Editorial Board From clones to immunopeptidomes: New developments in the characterization of permissive HLA-DP mismatches in hematopoietic cell transplantation Relevance of donor-specific HLA antibodies in hematopoietic cell transplantation HLA structure and function in hematopoietic-cell transplantation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1