培训中心能否与患者教育者一起提供本科医学教育?

IF 1.5 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Education for Primary Care Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1080/14739879.2022.2137855
Debra de Silva, Rachel Roberts, Melvyn Jones, Joanna Yong, Sophie Park
{"title":"培训中心能否与患者教育者一起提供本科医学教育?","authors":"Debra de Silva,&nbsp;Rachel Roberts,&nbsp;Melvyn Jones,&nbsp;Joanna Yong,&nbsp;Sophie Park","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2022.2137855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical schools may find it difficult to coordinate GP practices to support undergraduate medical education in primary care. In England, every Integrated Care System area now has a funded training hub to plan and upskill the primary care and community health workforce. We evaluated whether a training hub could help deliver undergraduate medical education, co-facilitated by patient educators. No published research has evaluated this model before.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used before and after surveys (617 students), interviews (28) and focus groups (20 people) with undergraduate medical students, patient educators and training hub and medical school team members.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>It was feasible for a training hub to develop and co-deliver a workshop with patient educators. 61% of Year 4 undergraduate students (first clinical year) took part, a high attendance rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. 80% of students said they learnt a lot about managing conditions in primary care and the community as a result. They particularly valued engaging with patient educators and seeing interprofessional working between GPs and pharmacists, which were cornerstones of the training hub approach. The hub was able to recruit and retain patient educators more effectively than the medical school alone. Patient educators said they felt valued and developed new skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working with training hubs may be part of the solution to issues medical schools face when organising undergraduate education about primary care. This small evaluation suggests that this model could be tested further.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can a training hub deliver undergraduate medical education with patient educators?\",\"authors\":\"Debra de Silva,&nbsp;Rachel Roberts,&nbsp;Melvyn Jones,&nbsp;Joanna Yong,&nbsp;Sophie Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14739879.2022.2137855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical schools may find it difficult to coordinate GP practices to support undergraduate medical education in primary care. In England, every Integrated Care System area now has a funded training hub to plan and upskill the primary care and community health workforce. We evaluated whether a training hub could help deliver undergraduate medical education, co-facilitated by patient educators. No published research has evaluated this model before.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used before and after surveys (617 students), interviews (28) and focus groups (20 people) with undergraduate medical students, patient educators and training hub and medical school team members.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>It was feasible for a training hub to develop and co-deliver a workshop with patient educators. 61% of Year 4 undergraduate students (first clinical year) took part, a high attendance rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. 80% of students said they learnt a lot about managing conditions in primary care and the community as a result. They particularly valued engaging with patient educators and seeing interprofessional working between GPs and pharmacists, which were cornerstones of the training hub approach. The hub was able to recruit and retain patient educators more effectively than the medical school alone. Patient educators said they felt valued and developed new skills.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Working with training hubs may be part of the solution to issues medical schools face when organising undergraduate education about primary care. This small evaluation suggests that this model could be tested further.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education for Primary Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2022.2137855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2022.2137855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医学院可能会发现很难协调全科医生的实践来支持初级保健的本科医学教育。在英格兰,每个综合保健系统地区现在都有一个资助的培训中心,以规划和提高初级保健和社区卫生工作人员的技能。我们评估了培训中心是否可以帮助提供本科医学教育,由患者教育者共同促进。之前还没有发表的研究评估过这个模型。方法:采用前后调查法(617名学生)、访谈法(28人)和焦点小组法(20人)对医学本科学生、患者教育工作者、培训中心和医学院团队成员进行调查。研究结果:培训中心与患者教育者共同开发和提供研讨会是可行的。61%的四年级本科生(临床第一年)参加了该活动,在COVID-19大流行期间出勤率很高。80%的学生表示,他们因此学到了很多关于管理初级保健和社区条件的知识。他们特别重视与患者教育者的接触,并看到全科医生和药剂师之间的跨专业合作,这是培训中心方法的基石。该中心能够比单独的医学院更有效地招募和留住病人教育工作者。有耐心的教育工作者说,他们感到受到重视,并发展了新的技能。结论:与培训中心合作可能是解决医学院在组织初级保健本科教育时面临的问题的一部分。这个小的评估表明这个模型可以进一步测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can a training hub deliver undergraduate medical education with patient educators?

Background: Medical schools may find it difficult to coordinate GP practices to support undergraduate medical education in primary care. In England, every Integrated Care System area now has a funded training hub to plan and upskill the primary care and community health workforce. We evaluated whether a training hub could help deliver undergraduate medical education, co-facilitated by patient educators. No published research has evaluated this model before.

Methods: We used before and after surveys (617 students), interviews (28) and focus groups (20 people) with undergraduate medical students, patient educators and training hub and medical school team members.

Findings: It was feasible for a training hub to develop and co-deliver a workshop with patient educators. 61% of Year 4 undergraduate students (first clinical year) took part, a high attendance rate during the COVID-19 pandemic. 80% of students said they learnt a lot about managing conditions in primary care and the community as a result. They particularly valued engaging with patient educators and seeing interprofessional working between GPs and pharmacists, which were cornerstones of the training hub approach. The hub was able to recruit and retain patient educators more effectively than the medical school alone. Patient educators said they felt valued and developed new skills.

Conclusions: Working with training hubs may be part of the solution to issues medical schools face when organising undergraduate education about primary care. This small evaluation suggests that this model could be tested further.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
期刊最新文献
Integrating academic medical education into vocational general practitioner training: how do these combined training posts impact on subsequent career paths? The Glasgow experience: a model for GP out-of-hours teaching for year 3 medical students. The cost of everything …. The digital Balint: using AI in reflective practice. Preparing GP registrars for leadership in multidisciplinary primary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1