研究自闭症和非自闭症互动中融洽关系的标记。

Olivia M Rifai, Sue Fletcher-Watson, Lorena Jiménez-Sánchez, Catherine J Crompton
{"title":"研究自闭症和非自闭症互动中融洽关系的标记。","authors":"Olivia M Rifai, Sue Fletcher-Watson, Lorena Jiménez-Sánchez, Catherine J Crompton","doi":"10.1089/aut.2021.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Autism is considered to entail a social impairment whereby autistic people experience difficulty interpreting others' mental states. However, recent research has shown that nonautistic people also have difficulty understanding the mental states of autistic people. This mismatch of understanding may explain lower rapport in interactions between autistic and nonautistic people. As mental states can be expressed externally through socially normed signals, it is important to investigate the role of such signals in autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions. This study explores variability in two social signals between autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions, and how their use may affect rapport within interactions. Methods: Videos from a previous study of autistic, nonautistic, and mixed pair interactions in a diffusion chain context in which participants were aware of others' diagnostic status were video coded for mutual gaze and backchanneling as candidate indicators of interactional rapport. Results: Although use of mutual gaze and backchanneling was lower in mixed pairs than in nonautistic pairs, corresponding to lower ratings of interactional rapport, less backchanneling in autistic pairs of both nonverbal and verbal subtypes corresponded to higher ratings of rapport. Conclusions: We observed differences in the use of candidate rapport markers between autistic, mixed, and nonautistic interactions, which did not map onto patterns of rapport scores, suggesting differences in reliance on these cues between autistic and nonautistic people. These results suggest that visible markers of rapport may vary by neurotype or pairing and give clues to inform future investigations of autistic interaction.","PeriodicalId":72338,"journal":{"name":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","volume":"4 1","pages":"3-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992924/pdf/","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Markers of Rapport in Autistic and Nonautistic Interactions.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia M Rifai, Sue Fletcher-Watson, Lorena Jiménez-Sánchez, Catherine J Crompton\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/aut.2021.0017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Autism is considered to entail a social impairment whereby autistic people experience difficulty interpreting others' mental states. However, recent research has shown that nonautistic people also have difficulty understanding the mental states of autistic people. This mismatch of understanding may explain lower rapport in interactions between autistic and nonautistic people. As mental states can be expressed externally through socially normed signals, it is important to investigate the role of such signals in autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions. This study explores variability in two social signals between autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions, and how their use may affect rapport within interactions. Methods: Videos from a previous study of autistic, nonautistic, and mixed pair interactions in a diffusion chain context in which participants were aware of others' diagnostic status were video coded for mutual gaze and backchanneling as candidate indicators of interactional rapport. Results: Although use of mutual gaze and backchanneling was lower in mixed pairs than in nonautistic pairs, corresponding to lower ratings of interactional rapport, less backchanneling in autistic pairs of both nonverbal and verbal subtypes corresponded to higher ratings of rapport. Conclusions: We observed differences in the use of candidate rapport markers between autistic, mixed, and nonautistic interactions, which did not map onto patterns of rapport scores, suggesting differences in reliance on these cues between autistic and nonautistic people. These results suggest that visible markers of rapport may vary by neurotype or pairing and give clues to inform future investigations of autistic interaction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"3-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992924/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism in adulthood : challenges and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2021.0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

背景:自闭症被认为是一种社会障碍,自闭症患者难以理解他人的精神状态。然而,最近的研究表明,非自闭症患者也很难理解自闭症患者的精神状态。这种理解上的不匹配可能解释了自闭症患者和非自闭症患者之间互动的融洽程度较低。由于心理状态可以通过社会规范信号对外表达,因此研究这些信号在自闭症、非自闭症和混合互动中的作用是很重要的。本研究探讨了自闭症、非自闭症和混合互动之间两种社会信号的可变性,以及它们的使用如何影响互动中的融洽关系。方法:对先前研究的自闭症、非自闭症和混合配对在扩散链背景下的互动进行视频编码,其中参与者意识到他人的诊断状态,并将其作为相互凝视和反向通道的候选互动关系指标。结果:虽然在混合组中,相互凝视和反向通道的使用比非自闭症组低,对应于互动融洽的评分较低,但在非语言和语言亚型的自闭症组中,反向通道较少对应于更高的融洽评分。结论:我们观察到在自闭症、混合和非自闭症互动中,候选关系标记的使用存在差异,而这些差异并没有映射到关系得分的模式上,这表明自闭症和非自闭症人群对这些线索的依赖存在差异。这些结果表明,融洽关系的可见标记可能因神经类型或配对而异,并为自闭症互动的未来研究提供线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating Markers of Rapport in Autistic and Nonautistic Interactions.
Background: Autism is considered to entail a social impairment whereby autistic people experience difficulty interpreting others' mental states. However, recent research has shown that nonautistic people also have difficulty understanding the mental states of autistic people. This mismatch of understanding may explain lower rapport in interactions between autistic and nonautistic people. As mental states can be expressed externally through socially normed signals, it is important to investigate the role of such signals in autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions. This study explores variability in two social signals between autistic, nonautistic, and mixed interactions, and how their use may affect rapport within interactions. Methods: Videos from a previous study of autistic, nonautistic, and mixed pair interactions in a diffusion chain context in which participants were aware of others' diagnostic status were video coded for mutual gaze and backchanneling as candidate indicators of interactional rapport. Results: Although use of mutual gaze and backchanneling was lower in mixed pairs than in nonautistic pairs, corresponding to lower ratings of interactional rapport, less backchanneling in autistic pairs of both nonverbal and verbal subtypes corresponded to higher ratings of rapport. Conclusions: We observed differences in the use of candidate rapport markers between autistic, mixed, and nonautistic interactions, which did not map onto patterns of rapport scores, suggesting differences in reliance on these cues between autistic and nonautistic people. These results suggest that visible markers of rapport may vary by neurotype or pairing and give clues to inform future investigations of autistic interaction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Community Member Views on Autism Intervention: Effects of Closeness to Autistic People with Intellectual Disabilities And Nonspeaking Autistic People. Call for Papers: Autism and Aging: A Lifespan Approach: Deadline for Manuscript Submission: January 15, 2024. A Qualitative Study of Autistic Adults' Quality of Life During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Lockdowns. Autistic People and Moving Home: A Systematic Review. Early-Career Autism Researchers Are Shifting Their Research Directions: Tragedy or Opportunity?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1