阻塞性通气缺陷(OVD)的定义和分级:“FEV1/FVC正常下限(LLN) vs. Z-score”和“FEV1预测百分比(%pred) vs. Z-score”。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Libyan Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751
Rim Kammoun, Ines Ghannouchi, Sonia Rouatbi, Helmi Ben Saad
{"title":"阻塞性通气缺陷(OVD)的定义和分级:“FEV1/FVC正常下限(LLN) vs. Z-score”和“FEV1预测百分比(%pred) vs. Z-score”。","authors":"Rim Kammoun,&nbsp;Ines Ghannouchi,&nbsp;Sonia Rouatbi,&nbsp;Helmi Ben Saad","doi":"10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) is defined by a low forced expiratory volume/'forced/slow' vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) (e.g. <lower limit of normal (LLN)). However, the LLN can be estimated either by the 90% confidence interval (or the 90th percentile) (American Thoracic and the European Respiratory Societies (ATS/ERS) method) or by the Z-score (global lung initiative (GLI) method). In 2014, a new alternative classification (GLI classification) for grading the OVD severity was proposed to replace the 2005-ATS/ERS one. The aims of the present study were to determine, according to the two methods (GLI vs. ATS/ERS), the frequency of participants having an OVD; and to compare the two classifications (GLI vs. ATS/ERS) of OVD severity. This was a prospective study including 1000 participants (mean age = 41 ± 10 years). The OVD was defined according to the ATS/ERS [FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < LLN (=local norms value - 1.64 × residual standard deviation)] and GLI (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC Z-score < -1.64) criteria. The following OVD classifications severity were applied: ATS/ERS (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred): mild (>70%), moderate (60-69%), moderately severe (50-59%), severe (35-49%), and very severe (<35%) and GLI (FEV<sub>1</sub> Z-score): mild (≥ -2.0), moderate (-2.0 to -2.5), moderately severe (-2.5 to -3.0), severe (-3.0 to -4.0), and very severe (<-4.0). The frequencies of OVD were 14.4% (ATS/ERS method) and 10.5% (GLI method) (p < 0.05). Among the 103 participants having an OVD according to the two methods, the severity classification was mild (34.95% vs. 37.86%, p < 0.05), moderate (25.24% vs. 18.45%, p < 0.05), moderately severe (23.30% vs. 15.53%, p = 0.144), severe (9.71% vs. 20.39%, p < 0.05), and very severe (6.80% vs. 7.77%, p = 0.785), respectively for the ATS/ERS and GLI classifications. The two OVD definitions were not exchangeable. Moreover, the two grading severity systems misclassified the OVD grades.</p>","PeriodicalId":49910,"journal":{"name":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"1487751"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining and grading an obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD): 'FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC lower limit of normal (LLN) vs. Z-score' and 'FEV<sub>1</sub> percentage predicted (%pred) vs. Z-score'.\",\"authors\":\"Rim Kammoun,&nbsp;Ines Ghannouchi,&nbsp;Sonia Rouatbi,&nbsp;Helmi Ben Saad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) is defined by a low forced expiratory volume/'forced/slow' vital capacity (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) (e.g. <lower limit of normal (LLN)). However, the LLN can be estimated either by the 90% confidence interval (or the 90th percentile) (American Thoracic and the European Respiratory Societies (ATS/ERS) method) or by the Z-score (global lung initiative (GLI) method). In 2014, a new alternative classification (GLI classification) for grading the OVD severity was proposed to replace the 2005-ATS/ERS one. The aims of the present study were to determine, according to the two methods (GLI vs. ATS/ERS), the frequency of participants having an OVD; and to compare the two classifications (GLI vs. ATS/ERS) of OVD severity. This was a prospective study including 1000 participants (mean age = 41 ± 10 years). The OVD was defined according to the ATS/ERS [FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC < LLN (=local norms value - 1.64 × residual standard deviation)] and GLI (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC Z-score < -1.64) criteria. The following OVD classifications severity were applied: ATS/ERS (FEV<sub>1</sub>%pred): mild (>70%), moderate (60-69%), moderately severe (50-59%), severe (35-49%), and very severe (<35%) and GLI (FEV<sub>1</sub> Z-score): mild (≥ -2.0), moderate (-2.0 to -2.5), moderately severe (-2.5 to -3.0), severe (-3.0 to -4.0), and very severe (<-4.0). The frequencies of OVD were 14.4% (ATS/ERS method) and 10.5% (GLI method) (p < 0.05). Among the 103 participants having an OVD according to the two methods, the severity classification was mild (34.95% vs. 37.86%, p < 0.05), moderate (25.24% vs. 18.45%, p < 0.05), moderately severe (23.30% vs. 15.53%, p = 0.144), severe (9.71% vs. 20.39%, p < 0.05), and very severe (6.80% vs. 7.77%, p = 0.785), respectively for the ATS/ERS and GLI classifications. The two OVD definitions were not exchangeable. Moreover, the two grading severity systems misclassified the OVD grades.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Libyan Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1487751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Libyan Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Libyan Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19932820.2018.1487751","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

阻塞性通气缺陷(OVD)的定义为低用力呼气量/“强制/缓慢”肺活量(FEV1/FVC)(例如1/FVC 1/FVC z -评分1%pred):轻度(>70%)、中度(60-69%)、中度(50-59%)、重度(35-49%)和非常严重(1 z -评分):轻度(≥-2.0)、中度(-2.0至-2.5)、中度(-2.5至-3.0)、重度(-3.0至-4.0)和非常严重(1 z -评分)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Defining and grading an obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD): 'FEV1/FVC lower limit of normal (LLN) vs. Z-score' and 'FEV1 percentage predicted (%pred) vs. Z-score'.

An obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD) is defined by a low forced expiratory volume/'forced/slow' vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) (e.g. 1/FVC < LLN (=local norms value - 1.64 × residual standard deviation)] and GLI (FEV1/FVC Z-score < -1.64) criteria. The following OVD classifications severity were applied: ATS/ERS (FEV1%pred): mild (>70%), moderate (60-69%), moderately severe (50-59%), severe (35-49%), and very severe (<35%) and GLI (FEV1 Z-score): mild (≥ -2.0), moderate (-2.0 to -2.5), moderately severe (-2.5 to -3.0), severe (-3.0 to -4.0), and very severe (<-4.0). The frequencies of OVD were 14.4% (ATS/ERS method) and 10.5% (GLI method) (p < 0.05). Among the 103 participants having an OVD according to the two methods, the severity classification was mild (34.95% vs. 37.86%, p < 0.05), moderate (25.24% vs. 18.45%, p < 0.05), moderately severe (23.30% vs. 15.53%, p = 0.144), severe (9.71% vs. 20.39%, p < 0.05), and very severe (6.80% vs. 7.77%, p = 0.785), respectively for the ATS/ERS and GLI classifications. The two OVD definitions were not exchangeable. Moreover, the two grading severity systems misclassified the OVD grades.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Libyan Journal of Medicine
Libyan Journal of Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Libyan Journal of Medicine (LJM) is a peer-reviewed, Open Access, international medical journal aiming to promote heath and health education by publishing high-quality medical research in the different disciplines of medicine. LJM was founded in 2006 by a group of enthusiastic Libyan medical scientists who looked at the contribution of Libyan publications to the international medical literature and saw that a publication outlet was missing. To fill this gap they launched LJM as a tool for transferring current medical knowledge to and from colleagues in developing countries, particularly African countries, as well as internationally.The journal is still led by a group of Libyan physicians inside and outside Libya, but it also enjoys support and recognition from the international medical community.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Ramadan on cognitive functions in young boys. Factors influencing fatigue among patients undergoing hemodialysis: a multi-center cross-sectional study. Satisfaction with telemedicine use during COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a systematic review. Radiographic evaluation of teeth with pulp stones and pulp canal obliteration: characteristics, and associations with dental parameters. The role of human rhinovirus in COPD exacerbations in Abu Dhabi: molecular epidemiology and clinical significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1