小儿脐下手术中尾麻阻滞对围手术期疼痛控制和麻醉剂减少的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验研究。

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-02 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_64_22
Zeana Amer Gawe, Hasan Mohamed Isa, Muatasem Mohamed Almashaur, Fayza Haider, Khadija Almulla
{"title":"小儿脐下手术中尾麻阻滞对围手术期疼痛控制和麻醉剂减少的影响:一项前瞻性随机试验研究。","authors":"Zeana Amer Gawe,&nbsp;Hasan Mohamed Isa,&nbsp;Muatasem Mohamed Almashaur,&nbsp;Fayza Haider,&nbsp;Khadija Almulla","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_64_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caudal epidural block (CEB) is a commonly performed neuraxial block to provide effective pain relief and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of adding CEB to general anesthesia (GA) in terms of intra- and postoperative pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized case-controlled trial study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Operation theater, and postoperative recovery rooms at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 74 patients aged 2 months to 6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I were recruited over a 6-month period between December 2019 and May 2020. Patients were allocated into two groups (Group A, with CEB) or (Group B, without CEB). Both groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, pain scores, level of sedation, analgesia need, and parental satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Data were analyzed using SPSS program. Categorical and numerical variables of both the groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with CEB had better hemodynamic stability during the surgical procedure based on heart rate (<i>P</i> = 0.039). Pain intensity scores were less in patients with CEB than those without (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was lower in Group A compared to Group B at the end of surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.002). They were also ambulated earlier and discharged sooner than those without CEB. Parental satisfaction was 92.1% in Group A compared to 63.9% in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding CEB to GA for intraoperative and perioperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery makes it more effective, safe, and with better parental satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 3","pages":"301-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813991/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Caudal Anesthesia Block on Perioperative Pain Control and Reduction of the Anesthetic Agent in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial Study.\",\"authors\":\"Zeana Amer Gawe,&nbsp;Hasan Mohamed Isa,&nbsp;Muatasem Mohamed Almashaur,&nbsp;Fayza Haider,&nbsp;Khadija Almulla\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aer.aer_64_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Caudal epidural block (CEB) is a commonly performed neuraxial block to provide effective pain relief and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of adding CEB to general anesthesia (GA) in terms of intra- and postoperative pain management.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective, randomized case-controlled trial study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Operation theater, and postoperative recovery rooms at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 74 patients aged 2 months to 6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I were recruited over a 6-month period between December 2019 and May 2020. Patients were allocated into two groups (Group A, with CEB) or (Group B, without CEB). Both groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, pain scores, level of sedation, analgesia need, and parental satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Data were analyzed using SPSS program. Categorical and numerical variables of both the groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with CEB had better hemodynamic stability during the surgical procedure based on heart rate (<i>P</i> = 0.039). Pain intensity scores were less in patients with CEB than those without (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was lower in Group A compared to Group B at the end of surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.002). They were also ambulated earlier and discharged sooner than those without CEB. Parental satisfaction was 92.1% in Group A compared to 63.9% in Group B (<i>P</i> = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding CEB to GA for intraoperative and perioperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery makes it more effective, safe, and with better parental satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"301-306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9813991/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_64_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/11/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_64_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:尾部硬膜外阻滞(CEB)是一种常用的神经轴阻滞,可为接受脐下手术的儿童患者提供有效的疼痛缓解和镇痛。目的:本研究旨在比较全身麻醉(GA)中加入CEB在术中和术后疼痛管理方面的有效性。设计:前瞻性、随机病例对照试验研究。背景:巴林Salmaniya医疗中心的手术室和术后恢复室。材料和方法:在2019年12月至2020年5月的6个月时间里,共招募了74名年龄在2个月至6岁之间的美国麻醉师学会身体状况分类为I的患者。患者被分为两组(A组,有CEB)或(B组,无CEB)。根据血液动力学稳定性、疼痛评分、镇静水平、镇痛需求和父母满意度对两组进行比较。统计分析:数据采用SPSS软件进行分析。比较了两组的分类变量和数值变量。结果:根据心率,CEB患者在手术过程中具有更好的血液动力学稳定性(P=0.039)。CEB患者的疼痛强度评分低于无CEB患者(P<0.001)。手术结束时,A组的芬太尼消耗量低于B组(P=0.002)。他们也比无CEB的患者更早行走和出院。A组的父母满意度为92.1%,而B组为63.9%(P=0.012)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Caudal Anesthesia Block on Perioperative Pain Control and Reduction of the Anesthetic Agent in Pediatric Infraumbilical Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Trial Study.

Background: Caudal epidural block (CEB) is a commonly performed neuraxial block to provide effective pain relief and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery.

Aims: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of adding CEB to general anesthesia (GA) in terms of intra- and postoperative pain management.

Design: Prospective, randomized case-controlled trial study.

Setting: Operation theater, and postoperative recovery rooms at Salmaniya Medical Complex, Bahrain.

Materials and methods: A total of 74 patients aged 2 months to 6 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I were recruited over a 6-month period between December 2019 and May 2020. Patients were allocated into two groups (Group A, with CEB) or (Group B, without CEB). Both groups were compared based on hemodynamic stability, pain scores, level of sedation, analgesia need, and parental satisfaction.

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using SPSS program. Categorical and numerical variables of both the groups were compared.

Results: Patients with CEB had better hemodynamic stability during the surgical procedure based on heart rate (P = 0.039). Pain intensity scores were less in patients with CEB than those without (P < 0.001). Fentanyl consumption was lower in Group A compared to Group B at the end of surgery (P = 0.002). They were also ambulated earlier and discharged sooner than those without CEB. Parental satisfaction was 92.1% in Group A compared to 63.9% in Group B (P = 0.012).

Conclusions: Adding CEB to GA for intraoperative and perioperative pain control in pediatric patients undergoing infraumbilical surgery makes it more effective, safe, and with better parental satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1