创伤患者早期使用姑息治疗会诊的益处。

Anthony J Duncan, Lucas M Holkup, Hilla I Sang, Sheryl M Sahr
{"title":"创伤患者早期使用姑息治疗会诊的益处。","authors":"Anthony J Duncan,&nbsp;Lucas M Holkup,&nbsp;Hilla I Sang,&nbsp;Sheryl M Sahr","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effects of palliative care consultation if performed within 72 hours of admission on length of stay (LOS), mortality, and invasive procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Trauma patients, admitted to ICU with palliative care consultation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The ICU LOS was decreased in the early palliative care (EPC) group compared with the late palliative care (LPC) group, by 6 days versus 12 days, respectively. Similarly, the hospital LOS was also shorter in the EPC group by 8 days versus 17 days in the LPC group. In addition, the EPC group had lower rates of tracheostomy (4% vs 14%) and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (4% vs 15%) compared with the LPC group. There was no difference in mortality or discharge disposition between patients in the EPC versus LPC groups. It is noteworthy that the patients who received EPC were slightly older, but there were no other significant differences in demographics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EPC is associated with fewer procedures and a shorter amount of time spent in the hospital, with no immediate effect on mortality. These outcomes are consistent with studies that show patients' preferences toward the end of life, which typically involve less time in the hospital and fewer invasive procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10759,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Explorations","volume":"5 9","pages":"e0963"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/b6/cc9-5-e0963.PMC10465097.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benefits of Early Utilization of Palliative Care Consultation in Trauma Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony J Duncan,&nbsp;Lucas M Holkup,&nbsp;Hilla I Sang,&nbsp;Sheryl M Sahr\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000000963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the effects of palliative care consultation if performed within 72 hours of admission on length of stay (LOS), mortality, and invasive procedures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Trauma patients, admitted to ICU with palliative care consultation.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The ICU LOS was decreased in the early palliative care (EPC) group compared with the late palliative care (LPC) group, by 6 days versus 12 days, respectively. Similarly, the hospital LOS was also shorter in the EPC group by 8 days versus 17 days in the LPC group. In addition, the EPC group had lower rates of tracheostomy (4% vs 14%) and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (4% vs 15%) compared with the LPC group. There was no difference in mortality or discharge disposition between patients in the EPC versus LPC groups. It is noteworthy that the patients who received EPC were slightly older, but there were no other significant differences in demographics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EPC is associated with fewer procedures and a shorter amount of time spent in the hospital, with no immediate effect on mortality. These outcomes are consistent with studies that show patients' preferences toward the end of life, which typically involve less time in the hospital and fewer invasive procedures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"volume\":\"5 9\",\"pages\":\"e0963\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/14/b6/cc9-5-e0963.PMC10465097.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000000963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定是否在入院72小时内进行姑息治疗会诊对住院时间(LOS)、死亡率和侵入性手术的影响。设计:回顾性观察性研究。地点:单中心一级创伤中心。患者:创伤患者,入住ICU姑息治疗会诊。干预:没有。测量结果和主要结果:早期姑息治疗(EPC)组与晚期姑息治疗(LPC)组相比,ICU LOS分别减少了6天和12天。同样,EPC组的医院LOS也比LPC组短8天,而LPC组则短17天。此外,与LPC组相比,EPC组气管造口术(4%对14%)和经皮胃造口管(4%对15%)的发生率较低。EPC组与LPC组患者的死亡率或出院处置没有差异。值得注意的是,接受EPC的患者年龄稍大,但在人口统计学上没有其他显著差异。结论:EPC与较少的手术和较短的住院时间有关,对死亡率没有直接影响。这些结果与表明患者倾向于结束生命的研究相一致,这通常意味着住院时间更短,侵入性手术更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Benefits of Early Utilization of Palliative Care Consultation in Trauma Patients.

Objectives: To determine the effects of palliative care consultation if performed within 72 hours of admission on length of stay (LOS), mortality, and invasive procedures.

Design: Retrospective observational study.

Setting: Single-center level 1 trauma center.

Patients: Trauma patients, admitted to ICU with palliative care consultation.

Intervention: None.

Measurements and main results: The ICU LOS was decreased in the early palliative care (EPC) group compared with the late palliative care (LPC) group, by 6 days versus 12 days, respectively. Similarly, the hospital LOS was also shorter in the EPC group by 8 days versus 17 days in the LPC group. In addition, the EPC group had lower rates of tracheostomy (4% vs 14%) and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (4% vs 15%) compared with the LPC group. There was no difference in mortality or discharge disposition between patients in the EPC versus LPC groups. It is noteworthy that the patients who received EPC were slightly older, but there were no other significant differences in demographics.

Conclusions: EPC is associated with fewer procedures and a shorter amount of time spent in the hospital, with no immediate effect on mortality. These outcomes are consistent with studies that show patients' preferences toward the end of life, which typically involve less time in the hospital and fewer invasive procedures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A New Dosing Frontier: Retrospective Assessment of Effluent Flow Rates and Residual Renal Function Among Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Hemodynamic Determinants of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19 Knowledge and Practice Gaps in Pediatric Neurocritical Care Nursing: Lessons Learned From a Specialized Educational Boot Camp Unifying Fluid Responsiveness and Tolerance With Physiology: A Dynamic Interpretation of the Diamond–Forrester Classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1