视觉功能异常:道路交通伤害未被充分认识的危险因素。

IF 1.6 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306
Hassan Hashemi, Payam Nabovati, Abbasali Yekta, Ali Borojerdi, Hamidreza Fallahkohan, Farhad Rezvan, Mehdi Khabazkhoob
{"title":"视觉功能异常:道路交通伤害未被充分认识的危险因素。","authors":"Hassan Hashemi,&nbsp;Payam Nabovati,&nbsp;Abbasali Yekta,&nbsp;Ali Borojerdi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Fallahkohan,&nbsp;Farhad Rezvan,&nbsp;Mehdi Khabazkhoob","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based case-control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.12 and 0.037 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17-3.86; <i>P</i> = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"17 4","pages":"529-535"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Hassan Hashemi,&nbsp;Payam Nabovati,&nbsp;Abbasali Yekta,&nbsp;Ali Borojerdi,&nbsp;Hamidreza Fallahkohan,&nbsp;Farhad Rezvan,&nbsp;Mehdi Khabazkhoob\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based case-control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.12 and 0.037 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.48; <i>P</i> = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17-3.86; <i>P</i> = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"529-535\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9806314/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v17i4.12306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨道路交通事故与视力、屈光不正、视野、对比敏感度的关系。方法:这项以人群为基础的病例对照研究在通往伊朗德黑兰省的道路上进行。案例组由遇到事故并对事故负有责任的司机组成。以持续方式选择病例(发病率病例)。控制组是司机,他们是同一事件中对立的受害者。初次访谈后,对所有研究参与者进行验光和眼科检查,包括视力测量、屈光、视野评估、对比灵敏度测量和裂隙灯生物显微镜检查。结果:本研究分别选取281例和204例个体作为病例组和对照组。病例组和对照组的平均未矫正视力分别为0.05±0.12、0.037±0.10 logMAR (P = 0.095)。在病例组和对照组的参与者中,分别有32.8%和23%的人至少有一只眼睛有视野缺损(校正优势比[aOR] = 1.63, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.08-2.48;P = 0.021)。此外,16.2%的病例和8.3%的对照组双眼视野缺损(aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17-3.86;P = 0.012)。在非眩光条件下,病例组在所有空间频率下的对比敏感度较差。然而,在强光条件下,只有在每度12个周期(cpd)的空间频率下,病例组的对比敏感度才明显较差。结论:对比敏感度降低,尤其是在无眩光条件下,视野缺陷是影响道路交通事故发生率的危险因素。强烈建议在法律评估中特别注意这些视觉功能,以便对患有这些类型障碍的个人采取必要的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abnormal Visual Function: An Under-recognized Risk Factor of Road Traffic Injuries.

Purpose: To determine the relationship between road accidents with visual acuity, refractive errors, visual field, and contrast sensitivity.

Methods: This population-based case-control study was conducted on roads leading to Tehran Province, Iran. The case group comprised drivers who had met with accidents and were at fault for the accident. The cases were selected in an ongoing manner (incidence cases). The controls were drivers who were the opposing victims in the same. After an initial interview, optometric and ophthalmic examinations including the measurement of visual acuity, refraction, visual field assessment, contrast sensitivity measurement, and slit lamp biomicroscopy were performed for all study participants.

Results: In this study, 281 and 204 individuals were selected for the case and control groups. The mean uncorrected visual acuity was 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.037 ± 0.10 logMAR in the case and control groups, respectively (P = 0.095). Of the participants in the case and control groups, 32.8% and 23% had a visual field defect in at least one eye, respectively (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.48; P = 0.021). Moreover, 16.2% of the cases and 8.3% of the controls had visual field defects in both eyes (aOR = 2.13, 95% CI: 1.17-3.86; P = 0.012). Contrast sensitivity was worse in the case group in all spatial frequencies under non-glare conditions. However, under glare conditions, the contrast sensitivity was significantly worse in the case group only in the spatial frequency of 12 cycles per degree (cpd).

Conclusion: Reduced contrast sensitivity, especially under non-glare conditions, and visual field defects are risk factors that influence the prevalence of road accidents. It is strongly advised that special attention be paid to these visual functions in legal assessments to apply the necessary interventions in individuals with these types of disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: An Updated Comprehensive Review. Clinical Manifestations and Outcomes of Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation. Clinical Outcomes of Stage 2 (Pivotal) Use of a Modified Keratoprosthesis Device (ORC-KPro) in Patients with End-stage Corneal Blindness. Doxycycline versus Curcumin for Inhibition of Matrix Metalloproteinase Expression and Activity Following Chemically Induced Inflammation in Corneal Cells. Evaluation of Foveal Vasculature by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography after Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation versus Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1