高影响慢性疼痛:风险因素和预测因素的评估。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Korean Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3344/kjp.22357
İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk, Erman Şentürk, Işıl Üstün, Akın Gökçedağ, Nilgün Pulur Yıldırım, Nilüfer Kale İçen
{"title":"高影响慢性疼痛:风险因素和预测因素的评估。","authors":"İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk,&nbsp;Erman Şentürk,&nbsp;Işıl Üstün,&nbsp;Akın Gökçedağ,&nbsp;Nilgün Pulur Yıldırım,&nbsp;Nilüfer Kale İçen","doi":"10.3344/kjp.22357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has been proposed for patients with chronic pain who have significant limitations in work, social life, and personal care. Recognition of HICP and being able to distinguish patients with HICP from other chronic pain patients who do not have life interference allows the necessary measures to be taken in order to restore the physical and emotional functioning of the affected persons. The aim was to reveal the risk factors and predictors associated with HICP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with chronic pain without life interference (grade 1 and 2) and patients with HICP were compared. Significant data were evaluated with regression analysis to reveal the associated risk factors. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate predictors and present cutoff scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and six patients completed the study. From pain related cognitive processes, fear of pain (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98; <i>P</i> = 0.007) and helplessness (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; <i>P</i> = 0.018) were found to be risk factors associated with HICP. Predictors of HICP were evaluated by ROC analysis. The highest discrimination value was found for pain intensity (cut-off score > 6.5; 83.8% sensitive; 68.7% specific; area under the curve = 0.823; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study in our geography to evaluate HICP with measurement tools that evaluate all dimensions of pain. Moreover, it is the first study in the literature to evaluate predictors and cut-off scores using ROC analysis for HICP.</p>","PeriodicalId":56252,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Pain","volume":"36 1","pages":"84-97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/cb/kjp-36-1-84.PMC9812691.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-impact chronic pain: evaluation of risk factors and predictors.\",\"authors\":\"İlteriş Ahmet Şentürk,&nbsp;Erman Şentürk,&nbsp;Işıl Üstün,&nbsp;Akın Gökçedağ,&nbsp;Nilgün Pulur Yıldırım,&nbsp;Nilüfer Kale İçen\",\"doi\":\"10.3344/kjp.22357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has been proposed for patients with chronic pain who have significant limitations in work, social life, and personal care. Recognition of HICP and being able to distinguish patients with HICP from other chronic pain patients who do not have life interference allows the necessary measures to be taken in order to restore the physical and emotional functioning of the affected persons. The aim was to reveal the risk factors and predictors associated with HICP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with chronic pain without life interference (grade 1 and 2) and patients with HICP were compared. Significant data were evaluated with regression analysis to reveal the associated risk factors. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate predictors and present cutoff scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One thousand and six patients completed the study. From pain related cognitive processes, fear of pain (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98; <i>P</i> = 0.007) and helplessness (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; <i>P</i> = 0.018) were found to be risk factors associated with HICP. Predictors of HICP were evaluated by ROC analysis. The highest discrimination value was found for pain intensity (cut-off score > 6.5; 83.8% sensitive; 68.7% specific; area under the curve = 0.823; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study in our geography to evaluate HICP with measurement tools that evaluate all dimensions of pain. Moreover, it is the first study in the literature to evaluate predictors and cut-off scores using ROC analysis for HICP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"84-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b1/cb/kjp-36-1-84.PMC9812691.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.22357\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.22357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:高影响性慢性疼痛(high-impact chronic pain, HICP)的概念是针对在工作、社交生活和个人护理方面有明显限制的慢性疼痛患者提出的。识别HICP并能够将HICP患者与其他没有生活干扰的慢性疼痛患者区分开来,可以采取必要的措施,以恢复受影响者的身体和情感功能。目的是揭示与HICP相关的危险因素和预测因素。方法:将无生活干扰慢性疼痛患者(1级和2级)与HICP患者进行比较。采用回归分析对显著数据进行评价,揭示相关危险因素。接受工作特征(ROC)分析用于评估预测因子并给出截止评分。结果:1606例患者完成了研究。从疼痛相关的认知过程来看,疼痛恐惧(优势比[OR], 0.92;95%置信区间[CI], 0.87-0.98;P = 0.007)和无助感(OR, 1.06;95% ci, 1.01-1.12;P = 0.018)是与HICP相关的危险因素。采用ROC分析评估HICP的预测因素。疼痛强度的判别值最高(临界值> 6.5;83.8%敏感;特定的68.7%;曲线下面积= 0.823;P < 0.001)。结论:这是本地区第一个用测量工具评估HICP的研究,该测量工具可以评估疼痛的所有维度。此外,这是文献中第一个使用ROC分析评估HICP的预测因子和截止分数的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High-impact chronic pain: evaluation of risk factors and predictors.

Background: The concept of high-impact chronic pain (HICP) has been proposed for patients with chronic pain who have significant limitations in work, social life, and personal care. Recognition of HICP and being able to distinguish patients with HICP from other chronic pain patients who do not have life interference allows the necessary measures to be taken in order to restore the physical and emotional functioning of the affected persons. The aim was to reveal the risk factors and predictors associated with HICP.

Methods: Patients with chronic pain without life interference (grade 1 and 2) and patients with HICP were compared. Significant data were evaluated with regression analysis to reveal the associated risk factors. Receiving operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate predictors and present cutoff scores.

Results: One thousand and six patients completed the study. From pain related cognitive processes, fear of pain (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.98; P = 0.007) and helplessness (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = 0.018) were found to be risk factors associated with HICP. Predictors of HICP were evaluated by ROC analysis. The highest discrimination value was found for pain intensity (cut-off score > 6.5; 83.8% sensitive; 68.7% specific; area under the curve = 0.823; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: This is the first study in our geography to evaluate HICP with measurement tools that evaluate all dimensions of pain. Moreover, it is the first study in the literature to evaluate predictors and cut-off scores using ROC analysis for HICP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Pain
Korean Journal of Pain Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Korean Journal of Pain (Korean J Pain, KJP) is the official journal of the Korean Pain Society, founded in 1986. It has been published since 1988. It publishes peer reviewed original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education, and health policy. It has been published quarterly in English since 2009 (on the first day of January, April, July, and October). In addition, it has also become the official journal of the International Spinal Pain Society since 2016. The mission of the Journal is to improve the care of patients in pain by providing a forum for clinical researchers, basic scientists, clinicians, and other health professionals. The circulation number per issue is 50.
期刊最新文献
Ultrasound-guided pain management: pros, cons, and benefits for the Philippines. Retraction: Comparison of the efficacy of genicular nerve phenol neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A critical factor in resistant piriformis syndrome cases: awareness of sacrotuberous ligament pain. Effect of ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block on chronic pain in patients undergoing open inguinal hernia surgery under spinal anesthesia: a randomized double-blind study. Ultrasound-guided transoral pterygopalatine fossa block: cadaveric elaboration of a novel technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1