药品定价和报销:比较器、终点和成本效益作用。

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.33393/grhta.2022.2475
Claudio Jommi, Giovanni Apolone, Giovanna Scroccaro, Valentina Acciai, Antonio Addis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Renato Bernardini, Alberto Bortolami, Alessia Brigido, Giuliano Buzzetti, Pier Luigi Canonico, Francesca Caprari, Stefano Centanni, Chiara Cernetti, Americo Cicchetti, Giorgio Corsico, Francesco Damele, Filippo de Braud, Sara Manurita, Francesco Saverio Mennini, Irene Olivi, Federica Parretta, Lara Pippo, Stefania Pulimeno, Massimo Riccaboni, Giuseppe Rossi, Cecilia Saleri, Alessandra Sinibaldi, Federico Spandonaro, Cristian Stefenoni, Elena Visentin, Pierluigi Viale, Giuseppina Zapparelli, Patrizia Popoli
{"title":"药品定价和报销:比较器、终点和成本效益作用。","authors":"Claudio Jommi, Giovanni Apolone, Giovanna Scroccaro, Valentina Acciai, Antonio Addis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Renato Bernardini, Alberto Bortolami, Alessia Brigido, Giuliano Buzzetti, Pier Luigi Canonico, Francesca Caprari, Stefano Centanni, Chiara Cernetti, Americo Cicchetti, Giorgio Corsico, Francesco Damele, Filippo de Braud, Sara Manurita, Francesco Saverio Mennini, Irene Olivi, Federica Parretta, Lara Pippo, Stefania Pulimeno, Massimo Riccaboni, Giuseppe Rossi, Cecilia Saleri, Alessandra Sinibaldi, Federico Spandonaro, Cristian Stefenoni, Elena Visentin, Pierluigi Viale, Giuseppina Zapparelli, Patrizia Popoli","doi":"10.33393/grhta.2022.2475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/1st of October, 2021.\nThe two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.","PeriodicalId":12627,"journal":{"name":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/94/grhta-9-99.PMC9768592.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regolazione del prezzo e rimborso dei farmaci: comparatori, endpoint e ruolo della costo-efficacia.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Jommi, Giovanni Apolone, Giovanna Scroccaro, Valentina Acciai, Antonio Addis, Andrea Ardizzoni, Renato Bernardini, Alberto Bortolami, Alessia Brigido, Giuliano Buzzetti, Pier Luigi Canonico, Francesca Caprari, Stefano Centanni, Chiara Cernetti, Americo Cicchetti, Giorgio Corsico, Francesco Damele, Filippo de Braud, Sara Manurita, Francesco Saverio Mennini, Irene Olivi, Federica Parretta, Lara Pippo, Stefania Pulimeno, Massimo Riccaboni, Giuseppe Rossi, Cecilia Saleri, Alessandra Sinibaldi, Federico Spandonaro, Cristian Stefenoni, Elena Visentin, Pierluigi Viale, Giuseppina Zapparelli, Patrizia Popoli\",\"doi\":\"10.33393/grhta.2022.2475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/1st of October, 2021.\\nThe two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/94/grhta-9-99.PMC9768592.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2022.2475\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33393/grhta.2022.2475","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regolazione del prezzo e rimborso dei farmaci: comparatori, endpoint e ruolo della costo-efficacia.
This document illustrates the results of a discussion of two multi-disciplinary expert panels on pricing and reimbursement of medicines. Experts work in different organizations. The discussion focused on comparator(s), endpoint(s), negotiation of prices of new medicines and/or indications to include in the List 648, as well as the role of cost-effectiveness in the price and reimbursement negotiation. The debate took place during the fourth edition of the Seminari di Mogliano, organized on the 30th of September/1st of October, 2021. The two panels agreed on a general need to enhance interaction among the different stakeholders, in the early assessment and negotiation phases, and to increase the transparency/reproducibility of the decisions taken. The experts have also emphasized the need (i) to improve clarity in the evaluation of additional therapeutic value and the place in therapy with respect to comparators and how comparators are identified; (ii) to create work groups to identify the most appropriate endpoint(s), for each therapeutic area and level of unmet needs; (iii) to provide for a systematic use of cost-effectiveness when an added therapeutic value is delivered by a new medicine. With regard to the 648 List, the experts advocated for an overall reorganization of the current rules governing the special uses of drugs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment (GRHTA) is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which aims to promote health technology assessment and economic evaluation, enabling choices among alternative therapeutical paths or procedures with different clinical and economic outcomes. GRHTA is a unique journal having three different editorial boards who focus on their respective geographical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Il burden economico e sociale della porpora trombotica trombocitopenica congenita (cTTP) in Italia. Drug utilization and medication adherence for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: an Italian study. Analisi di impatto sul budget sanitario italiano di roxadustat per il trattamento dell’anemia da malattia renale cronica. Place in therapy of dalbavancin to treat Gram-positive infections in antimicrobial resistance era: an overview. The efficacy of dalbavancin and impact on hospitalization and treatment costs in patients with ABSSSI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1