揭秘布雷顿森林机构关于公共服务的花言巧语。

Chiara Mariotti, María José Romero
{"title":"揭秘布雷顿森林机构关于公共服务的花言巧语。","authors":"Chiara Mariotti,&nbsp;María José Romero","doi":"10.1057/s41301-022-00354-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reviews Bretton Woods Institutions' approach to public services, including during the recent COVID-19 crisis. Drawing on the specific case of IMF and World Bank's response to the multiple crisis triggered by the pandemic, it shows that there is a discourse-practice disjuncture in the institutions approach to public services as they continue to favour austerity and market-oriented solutions for the delivery of public services. The article therefore seeks to demystify the Bretton Woods institutions rhetoric and demand the adoption of a different way of understanding public services, and social policy more broadly.</p>","PeriodicalId":72792,"journal":{"name":"Development (Society for International Development)","volume":"65 2-4","pages":"217-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660200/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demystifying Bretton Woods Institutions' Rhetoric on Public Services.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Mariotti,&nbsp;María José Romero\",\"doi\":\"10.1057/s41301-022-00354-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article reviews Bretton Woods Institutions' approach to public services, including during the recent COVID-19 crisis. Drawing on the specific case of IMF and World Bank's response to the multiple crisis triggered by the pandemic, it shows that there is a discourse-practice disjuncture in the institutions approach to public services as they continue to favour austerity and market-oriented solutions for the delivery of public services. The article therefore seeks to demystify the Bretton Woods institutions rhetoric and demand the adoption of a different way of understanding public services, and social policy more broadly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"volume\":\"65 2-4\",\"pages\":\"217-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9660200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development (Society for International Development)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-022-00354-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development (Society for International Development)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-022-00354-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文回顾了布雷顿森林机构在公共服务方面的做法,包括在最近的COVID-19危机期间。根据货币基金组织和世界银行应对大流行病引发的多重危机的具体案例,报告表明,机构对公共服务的做法存在着话语与实践的脱节,因为它们继续支持紧缩政策和以市场为导向的解决方案来提供公共服务。因此,这篇文章试图揭开布雷顿森林机构修辞的神秘面纱,并要求采用一种不同的方式来更广泛地理解公共服务和社会政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Demystifying Bretton Woods Institutions' Rhetoric on Public Services.

This article reviews Bretton Woods Institutions' approach to public services, including during the recent COVID-19 crisis. Drawing on the specific case of IMF and World Bank's response to the multiple crisis triggered by the pandemic, it shows that there is a discourse-practice disjuncture in the institutions approach to public services as they continue to favour austerity and market-oriented solutions for the delivery of public services. The article therefore seeks to demystify the Bretton Woods institutions rhetoric and demand the adoption of a different way of understanding public services, and social policy more broadly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Getting to COP27: Bridging Generational Divide Low Carbon Mobility Transitions and Justice: A Case of Costa Rica Challenges and Potential to Revamp the Normative Framework on the Right to Development. The Structural Power of the State-Finance Nexus: Systemic Delinking for the Right to Development. The Future is Public! The Global Reclaiming and Democratization of Public Ownership Beyond the Market.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1