给合适的新生儿使用合适的抗生素?坦桑尼亚奔巴一家地区医院的前瞻性观察队列研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Journal of Tropical Pediatrics Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1093/tropej/fmac116
Lærke Vinge Larsen, Mathilde Languille Lassen, Stine Lund, Ulrikka Nygaard, Christine Manich Bech, Said Mzee, Said Mouhammed Ali, Anja Poulsen
{"title":"给合适的新生儿使用合适的抗生素?坦桑尼亚奔巴一家地区医院的前瞻性观察队列研究。","authors":"Lærke Vinge Larsen,&nbsp;Mathilde Languille Lassen,&nbsp;Stine Lund,&nbsp;Ulrikka Nygaard,&nbsp;Christine Manich Bech,&nbsp;Said Mzee,&nbsp;Said Mouhammed Ali,&nbsp;Anja Poulsen","doi":"10.1093/tropej/fmac116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highest neonatal mortality is in Sub-Saharan Africa, where neonatal sepsis accounts for approximately 50%. At Pemba Island, Tanzania, we examined the use of prophylactic antibiotics in neonates and related it to WHO guidelines and compared clinical signs of infection with the use of antibiotic treatment; furthermore, we aimed to investigate all use of antibiotic treatment in the neonatal period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study was performed from 1 January 2022 to 15 April 2022 at a district hospital on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Women admitted in early established or active labour, and their neonates, were eligible for inclusion. We used questionnaires for mother and health worker and examined the neonates 2 h after birth. Follow-up was made at discharge or at 18 h of life, and days 7 and 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 209 women and their 214 neonates. The neonatal mortality was 5 of 214 (23 per 1000 live births). According to WHO guidelines 29 (13.6%) had ≥ 1 risk factor for infection. Of these, three (10.3%) received prophylactic antibiotic treatment; only one (3.4%) received the correct antibiotic drug recommended in guidelines. Thirty-nine (18.2%) neonates had ≥ 1 clinical indicator of infection and 19 (48.7%) of these received antibiotic treatment. A total of 30 (14.0%) neonates received antibiotics during the study period. Twenty-three (76.7%) were treated with peroral antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to WHO guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent neonatal infection was low. Further, only half of neonates with clinical signs of infection received antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":17521,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The right antibiotic for the right neonate? A prospective observational cohort study at a district hospital in Pemba, Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Lærke Vinge Larsen,&nbsp;Mathilde Languille Lassen,&nbsp;Stine Lund,&nbsp;Ulrikka Nygaard,&nbsp;Christine Manich Bech,&nbsp;Said Mzee,&nbsp;Said Mouhammed Ali,&nbsp;Anja Poulsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tropej/fmac116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The highest neonatal mortality is in Sub-Saharan Africa, where neonatal sepsis accounts for approximately 50%. At Pemba Island, Tanzania, we examined the use of prophylactic antibiotics in neonates and related it to WHO guidelines and compared clinical signs of infection with the use of antibiotic treatment; furthermore, we aimed to investigate all use of antibiotic treatment in the neonatal period.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study was performed from 1 January 2022 to 15 April 2022 at a district hospital on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Women admitted in early established or active labour, and their neonates, were eligible for inclusion. We used questionnaires for mother and health worker and examined the neonates 2 h after birth. Follow-up was made at discharge or at 18 h of life, and days 7 and 28.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 209 women and their 214 neonates. The neonatal mortality was 5 of 214 (23 per 1000 live births). According to WHO guidelines 29 (13.6%) had ≥ 1 risk factor for infection. Of these, three (10.3%) received prophylactic antibiotic treatment; only one (3.4%) received the correct antibiotic drug recommended in guidelines. Thirty-nine (18.2%) neonates had ≥ 1 clinical indicator of infection and 19 (48.7%) of these received antibiotic treatment. A total of 30 (14.0%) neonates received antibiotics during the study period. Twenty-three (76.7%) were treated with peroral antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adherence to WHO guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent neonatal infection was low. Further, only half of neonates with clinical signs of infection received antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac116\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmac116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:撒哈拉以南非洲新生儿死亡率最高,新生儿败血症约占50%。在坦桑尼亚的彭巴岛,我们检查了新生儿预防性抗生素的使用情况,并将其与世卫组织指南联系起来,比较了感染的临床症状与抗生素治疗的使用情况;此外,我们的目的是调查所有使用抗生素治疗在新生儿期。方法:这项前瞻性观察队列研究于2022年1月1日至2022年4月15日在坦桑尼亚奔巴岛的一家地区医院进行。接受早期分娩或活跃期分娩的妇女及其新生儿有资格纳入。我们对母亲和卫生工作者进行问卷调查,并在新生儿出生后2小时对其进行检查。出院时、出生后18小时、第7天和第28天进行随访。结果:纳入209名妇女及其214名新生儿。新生儿死亡率为214例中的5例(每1000例活产23例)。根据世卫组织指南,29例(13.6%)感染危险因素≥1。其中,3人(10.3%)接受了预防性抗生素治疗;只有一人(3.4%)接受了指南中推荐的正确抗生素药物。39例(18.2%)新生儿感染临床指标≥1项,其中19例(48.7%)接受了抗生素治疗。在研究期间,共有30名(14.0%)新生儿接受了抗生素治疗。经口服抗生素治疗23例(76.7%)。结论:对世卫组织预防性抗生素治疗预防新生儿感染指南的依从性较低。此外,只有一半有感染临床症状的新生儿接受了抗生素治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The right antibiotic for the right neonate? A prospective observational cohort study at a district hospital in Pemba, Tanzania.

Background: The highest neonatal mortality is in Sub-Saharan Africa, where neonatal sepsis accounts for approximately 50%. At Pemba Island, Tanzania, we examined the use of prophylactic antibiotics in neonates and related it to WHO guidelines and compared clinical signs of infection with the use of antibiotic treatment; furthermore, we aimed to investigate all use of antibiotic treatment in the neonatal period.

Method: This prospective observational cohort study was performed from 1 January 2022 to 15 April 2022 at a district hospital on Pemba Island, Tanzania. Women admitted in early established or active labour, and their neonates, were eligible for inclusion. We used questionnaires for mother and health worker and examined the neonates 2 h after birth. Follow-up was made at discharge or at 18 h of life, and days 7 and 28.

Results: We included 209 women and their 214 neonates. The neonatal mortality was 5 of 214 (23 per 1000 live births). According to WHO guidelines 29 (13.6%) had ≥ 1 risk factor for infection. Of these, three (10.3%) received prophylactic antibiotic treatment; only one (3.4%) received the correct antibiotic drug recommended in guidelines. Thirty-nine (18.2%) neonates had ≥ 1 clinical indicator of infection and 19 (48.7%) of these received antibiotic treatment. A total of 30 (14.0%) neonates received antibiotics during the study period. Twenty-three (76.7%) were treated with peroral antibiotics.

Conclusion: Adherence to WHO guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic treatment to prevent neonatal infection was low. Further, only half of neonates with clinical signs of infection received antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics 医学-热带医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Tropical Pediatrics provides a link between theory and practice in the field. Papers report key results of clinical and community research, and considerations of programme development. More general descriptive pieces are included when they have application to work preceeding elsewhere. The journal also presents review articles, book reviews and, occasionally, short monographs and selections of important papers delivered at relevant conferences.
期刊最新文献
SimCapture app video performance assessment versus real-time instructor-based performance evaluation of undergraduates in neonatal resuscitation-an agreement study. Duration of a standard phototherapy course in jaundiced newborns with no neurotoxicity risk. Role of aminophylline in prevention of acute kidney injury in term neonates with severe perinatal asphyxia: a randomized open-label controlled trial. A systematic review of pelvic infective osteomyelitis in children: current state of evidence. Adenovirus respiratory infection with severe pneumonia in hospitalized children: a case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1