护理学硕士学位的目的、计划和个性化:一项综合综述。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Journal of Nursing Education Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.3928/01484834-20230712-06
Brenda Elliott, Kelly Dyar
{"title":"护理学硕士学位的目的、计划和个性化:一项综合综述。","authors":"Brenda Elliott,&nbsp;Kelly Dyar","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230712-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduate-level education programs use capstone experiences for students to demonstrate achieving essential learning and programmatic outcomes. However, a lack of standardization of these experiences and outcome measurements could result in varying competencies among students with the same degree. Employers seeking specific skills may find this problematic, and graduates may feel unprepared for new roles, which could hinder transition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of nine databases was conducted to identify: (1) the essential characteristics of master in nursing capstones and (2) the assessments programs use to demonstrate achievement of program outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthesis and analysis of six sources of evidence revealed uniform agreement in purpose, planning, and individualization of experiences, yet ways of assessing student achievement of program outcomes were less clear and varied widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Capstone experiences should be relevant to graduate-level education and include mapping to program outcomes to ensure students' competency and readiness to transition into their new role. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(9):502-508.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"62 9","pages":"502-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Purpose, Planning, and Individualization of Master of Science in Nursing Capstone Experiences: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Brenda Elliott,&nbsp;Kelly Dyar\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20230712-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Graduate-level education programs use capstone experiences for students to demonstrate achieving essential learning and programmatic outcomes. However, a lack of standardization of these experiences and outcome measurements could result in varying competencies among students with the same degree. Employers seeking specific skills may find this problematic, and graduates may feel unprepared for new roles, which could hinder transition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of nine databases was conducted to identify: (1) the essential characteristics of master in nursing capstones and (2) the assessments programs use to demonstrate achievement of program outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthesis and analysis of six sources of evidence revealed uniform agreement in purpose, planning, and individualization of experiences, yet ways of assessing student achievement of program outcomes were less clear and varied widely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Capstone experiences should be relevant to graduate-level education and include mapping to program outcomes to ensure students' competency and readiness to transition into their new role. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(9):502-508.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":\"62 9\",\"pages\":\"502-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-06\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究生水平的教育项目使用顶点经验为学生展示实现基本的学习和项目成果。然而,这些经验和结果测量缺乏标准化可能导致具有相同学位的学生之间的能力差异。寻找特殊技能的雇主可能会发现这个问题,而毕业生可能会觉得自己对新工作没有准备,这可能会阻碍他们的过渡。方法:对9个数据库进行系统检索,以确定:(1)护理硕士顶点课程的基本特征;(2)用于证明项目成果实现的评估项目。结果:对六个证据来源的综合和分析揭示了在目的、计划和个性化体验方面的统一一致,然而评估学生在项目成果方面的成就的方法不太明确,差异很大。结论:顶点经验应该与研究生水平的教育相关,并包括映射到项目结果,以确保学生的能力和准备过渡到他们的新角色。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;22(6):559 - 568。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Purpose, Planning, and Individualization of Master of Science in Nursing Capstone Experiences: An Integrative Review.

Background: Graduate-level education programs use capstone experiences for students to demonstrate achieving essential learning and programmatic outcomes. However, a lack of standardization of these experiences and outcome measurements could result in varying competencies among students with the same degree. Employers seeking specific skills may find this problematic, and graduates may feel unprepared for new roles, which could hinder transition.

Method: A systematic search of nine databases was conducted to identify: (1) the essential characteristics of master in nursing capstones and (2) the assessments programs use to demonstrate achievement of program outcomes.

Results: Synthesis and analysis of six sources of evidence revealed uniform agreement in purpose, planning, and individualization of experiences, yet ways of assessing student achievement of program outcomes were less clear and varied widely.

Conclusion: Capstone experiences should be relevant to graduate-level education and include mapping to program outcomes to ensure students' competency and readiness to transition into their new role. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(9):502-508.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the Power of NursingTM on Classroom Connectedness. Unveiling the SChematic Organization of Pharmacological Information for Nurses: A New Approach to Pharmacology Education for Nurses. Simulation Experiences Focusing on Addressing Culturally Based Hidden Bias and RacisM (A-CHARM). Simulation Expert Modeling to Teach Sensitive Screening in Nursing Education. Incorporating Social Needs Screening in Simulation for Family Nurse Practitioner Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1