口面裂缺陷婴儿的早产预测。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1177/10556656231198945
Katherine L Ludorf, Renata H Benjamin, Mark A Canfield, Michael D Swartz, A J Agopian
{"title":"口面裂缺陷婴儿的早产预测。","authors":"Katherine L Ludorf, Renata H Benjamin, Mark A Canfield, Michael D Swartz, A J Agopian","doi":"10.1177/10556656231198945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop risk prediction models for preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry for infants with orofacial clefts born between 1999-2014 were used to develop preterm birth predictive models. Logistic regression was used to consider maternal and infant characteristics, and internal validation of the final model was performed using bootstrapping methods. The area under the curve (AUC) statistic was generated to assess model performance, and separate predictive models were built and validated for infants with cleft lip and cleft palate alone. Several secondary analyses were conducted among subgroups of interest.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>State-wide, population-based Registry data.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>6774 infants with orofacial clefts born in Texas between 1999-2014.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final predictive model performed modestly, with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.67 among all infants with orofacial clefts. The optimism-corrected models for cleft lip (with or without cleft palate) and cleft palate alone had similar predictive capability, with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.67, respectively. Secondary analyses had similar results, but the model among infants with delivery prior to 32 weeks demonstrated higher optimism-corrected predictive capability (AUC = 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a first step towards predicting preterm birth risk among infants with orofacial clefts. Identifying pregnancies affected by orofacial clefts at the highest risk for preterm birth may lead to new avenues for improving outcomes among these infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"35-43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of Preterm Birth among Infants with Orofacial Cleft Defects.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine L Ludorf, Renata H Benjamin, Mark A Canfield, Michael D Swartz, A J Agopian\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231198945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop risk prediction models for preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry for infants with orofacial clefts born between 1999-2014 were used to develop preterm birth predictive models. Logistic regression was used to consider maternal and infant characteristics, and internal validation of the final model was performed using bootstrapping methods. The area under the curve (AUC) statistic was generated to assess model performance, and separate predictive models were built and validated for infants with cleft lip and cleft palate alone. Several secondary analyses were conducted among subgroups of interest.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>State-wide, population-based Registry data.</p><p><strong>Patients/participants: </strong>6774 infants with orofacial clefts born in Texas between 1999-2014.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>Preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final predictive model performed modestly, with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.67 among all infants with orofacial clefts. The optimism-corrected models for cleft lip (with or without cleft palate) and cleft palate alone had similar predictive capability, with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.67, respectively. Secondary analyses had similar results, but the model among infants with delivery prior to 32 weeks demonstrated higher optimism-corrected predictive capability (AUC = 0.74).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides a first step towards predicting preterm birth risk among infants with orofacial clefts. Identifying pregnancies affected by orofacial clefts at the highest risk for preterm birth may lead to new avenues for improving outcomes among these infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"35-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363204/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231198945\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231198945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 建立口面裂婴儿早产风险预测模型:开发口面裂婴儿早产风险预测模型:利用德克萨斯州出生缺陷登记处提供的 1999-2014 年间出生的口面部裂婴儿数据开发早产预测模型。使用逻辑回归法考虑母婴特征,并使用引导法对最终模型进行内部验证。生成的曲线下面积(AUC)统计量用于评估模型的性能,并为单独患有唇裂和腭裂的婴儿建立和验证了单独的预测模型。在感兴趣的亚组中进行了多项二次分析:全州人口登记数据:1999-2014年间在德克萨斯州出生的6774名患有口面裂的婴儿:主要结果测量指标:口面裂婴儿的早产情况:最终的预测模型表现一般,所有口面裂婴儿的乐观校正AUC为0.67。唇裂(伴有或不伴有腭裂)和单纯腭裂的乐观校正模型具有相似的预测能力,AUC 分别为 0.66 和 0.67。二次分析结果相似,但32周前分娩的婴儿的模型显示出更高的乐观校正预测能力(AUC = 0.74):这项研究为预测口面裂婴儿的早产风险迈出了第一步。确定受口面部裂纹影响的孕妇中早产风险最高的人群,可能会为改善这些婴儿的预后提供新的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of Preterm Birth among Infants with Orofacial Cleft Defects.

Objective: To develop risk prediction models for preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.

Design: Data from the Texas Birth Defects Registry for infants with orofacial clefts born between 1999-2014 were used to develop preterm birth predictive models. Logistic regression was used to consider maternal and infant characteristics, and internal validation of the final model was performed using bootstrapping methods. The area under the curve (AUC) statistic was generated to assess model performance, and separate predictive models were built and validated for infants with cleft lip and cleft palate alone. Several secondary analyses were conducted among subgroups of interest.

Setting: State-wide, population-based Registry data.

Patients/participants: 6774 infants with orofacial clefts born in Texas between 1999-2014.

Main outcome measure(s): Preterm birth among infants with orofacial clefts.

Results: The final predictive model performed modestly, with an optimism-corrected AUC of 0.67 among all infants with orofacial clefts. The optimism-corrected models for cleft lip (with or without cleft palate) and cleft palate alone had similar predictive capability, with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.67, respectively. Secondary analyses had similar results, but the model among infants with delivery prior to 32 weeks demonstrated higher optimism-corrected predictive capability (AUC = 0.74).

Conclusions: This study provides a first step towards predicting preterm birth risk among infants with orofacial clefts. Identifying pregnancies affected by orofacial clefts at the highest risk for preterm birth may lead to new avenues for improving outcomes among these infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Alveolar Cleft Volume and Nasomaxillary Form in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Dermoid Cyst of the Hard Palate: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Internationally Adopted Children with Cleft Lip and Palate. Ultrasound Detection of Fetal Palate Development in the Early Stages of the Second Trimester and Its Clinical Application. Patient Safety and Suitability for Primary Cleft Lip Repair as Day Case Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1