基于模拟的医学教育:为新手使用的评估工具的开发。

Q3 Medicine Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Sasha M Ulrich, Joseph C L'Huillier, Sarah A Jung, Laura K Krecko, Alexandra A Rosser, Amy K Schulze, Amy E Liepert, Ann P O'Rourke
{"title":"基于模拟的医学教育:为新手使用的评估工具的开发。","authors":"Sasha M Ulrich,&nbsp;Joseph C L'Huillier,&nbsp;Sarah A Jung,&nbsp;Laura K Krecko,&nbsp;Alexandra A Rosser,&nbsp;Amy K Schulze,&nbsp;Amy E Liepert,&nbsp;Ann P O'Rourke","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based medical education, an educational model in which students engage in simulated patient scenarios, improves performance. However, assessment tools including the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) scale require expert assessors. We modified this tool for novice use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students participated in 5 nontechnical simulations. The NOTECHS scale was modified to allow for novice evaluation. Three novices and 2 experts assessed performance, with intraclass correlation used to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two learners participated in the simulations. Novice reviewers had moderate to excellent correlation among evaluations (0.66 < intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] < 0.95). Novice and expert reviewers had moderate to good correlation among evaluations (0.51 < ICC < 0.88).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The modified NOTECHS scales can be utilized by novices to evaluate simulation performance. Novice assessment correlates with expert review. These tools may encourage the use of simulation-based medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation-Based Medical Education: Development of an Assessment Tool for Novice Use.\",\"authors\":\"Sasha M Ulrich,&nbsp;Joseph C L'Huillier,&nbsp;Sarah A Jung,&nbsp;Laura K Krecko,&nbsp;Alexandra A Rosser,&nbsp;Amy K Schulze,&nbsp;Amy E Liepert,&nbsp;Ann P O'Rourke\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Simulation-based medical education, an educational model in which students engage in simulated patient scenarios, improves performance. However, assessment tools including the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) scale require expert assessors. We modified this tool for novice use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical students participated in 5 nontechnical simulations. The NOTECHS scale was modified to allow for novice evaluation. Three novices and 2 experts assessed performance, with intraclass correlation used to assess validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two learners participated in the simulations. Novice reviewers had moderate to excellent correlation among evaluations (0.66 < intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] < 0.95). Novice and expert reviewers had moderate to good correlation among evaluations (0.51 < ICC < 0.88).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The modified NOTECHS scales can be utilized by novices to evaluate simulation performance. Novice assessment correlates with expert review. These tools may encourage the use of simulation-based medical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基于模拟的医学教育是一种教育模式,在这种教育模式中,学生参与模拟的患者场景,可以提高成绩。然而,包括牛津非技术技能(NOTECHS)量表在内的评估工具需要专家评估人员。我们修改了这个工具以供新手使用。方法:医学生参与5次非技术模拟。对NOTECHS量表进行了修改,以允许新手进行评估。3名新手和2名专家评估绩效,用类内相关性评估效度。结果:22名学习者参与了模拟。新手审稿人评价间的相关性为中等至极优(0.66 <类内相关系数[ICC] < 0.95)。新手审稿人与专家审稿人的评价有中等至良好的相关性(0.51 < ICC < 0.88)。讨论:修改后的NOTECHS量表可用于新手评估模拟性能。新手评价与专家评价相关联。这些工具可能鼓励使用基于模拟的医学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Simulation-Based Medical Education: Development of an Assessment Tool for Novice Use.

Background: Simulation-based medical education, an educational model in which students engage in simulated patient scenarios, improves performance. However, assessment tools including the Oxford Non-Technical Skills (NOTECHS) scale require expert assessors. We modified this tool for novice use.

Methods: Medical students participated in 5 nontechnical simulations. The NOTECHS scale was modified to allow for novice evaluation. Three novices and 2 experts assessed performance, with intraclass correlation used to assess validity.

Results: Twenty-two learners participated in the simulations. Novice reviewers had moderate to excellent correlation among evaluations (0.66 < intraclass correlation coefficients [ICC] < 0.95). Novice and expert reviewers had moderate to good correlation among evaluations (0.51 < ICC < 0.88).

Discussion: The modified NOTECHS scales can be utilized by novices to evaluate simulation performance. Novice assessment correlates with expert review. These tools may encourage the use of simulation-based medical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
期刊最新文献
Age-Appropriate Cancer Screenings Through a Dermatology Len. Stem Cell Science and Regenerative Biology: Tools for Building New Treatments. Amiodarone Pharmacovigilance Through an Intelligent Electronic Health Record Application. Assessment of Uterine Fibroid Knowledge and Educational Interests Among Health Care Professionals. An Unusual Presentation of Blastomycosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1