{"title":"急诊科可能避免的破伤风强化治疗:服务评估。","authors":"Paul McColgan","doi":"10.7748/en.2023.e2149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tetanus infection is caused by the Clostridium tetani bacterium, which can enter the body through a wound or puncture in the skin. Patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with a laceration, wound or bite require a risk assessment to determine whether the wound is clean, tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone. Those assessed as tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone, with an uncertain or inadequate immunisation history, should receive tetanus prophylaxis treatment. However, some patients receive this treatment unnecessarily. This article describes a service evaluation that explored whether practice in one ED was contributing to potentially avoidable tetanus prophylaxis treatment. The article outlines the results of a five-year retrospective database review, which determined that 18% of all tetanus prophylaxis treatments delivered in the ED during that period were unnecessary. The author makes some recommendations to improve practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":35711,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Nurse","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potentially avoidable tetanus booster in the emergency department: a service evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Paul McColgan\",\"doi\":\"10.7748/en.2023.e2149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tetanus infection is caused by the Clostridium tetani bacterium, which can enter the body through a wound or puncture in the skin. Patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with a laceration, wound or bite require a risk assessment to determine whether the wound is clean, tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone. Those assessed as tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone, with an uncertain or inadequate immunisation history, should receive tetanus prophylaxis treatment. However, some patients receive this treatment unnecessarily. This article describes a service evaluation that explored whether practice in one ED was contributing to potentially avoidable tetanus prophylaxis treatment. The article outlines the results of a five-year retrospective database review, which determined that 18% of all tetanus prophylaxis treatments delivered in the ED during that period were unnecessary. The author makes some recommendations to improve practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Nurse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2023.e2149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7748/en.2023.e2149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potentially avoidable tetanus booster in the emergency department: a service evaluation.
Tetanus infection is caused by the Clostridium tetani bacterium, which can enter the body through a wound or puncture in the skin. Patients who present to an emergency department (ED) with a laceration, wound or bite require a risk assessment to determine whether the wound is clean, tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone. Those assessed as tetanus prone or high-risk tetanus prone, with an uncertain or inadequate immunisation history, should receive tetanus prophylaxis treatment. However, some patients receive this treatment unnecessarily. This article describes a service evaluation that explored whether practice in one ED was contributing to potentially avoidable tetanus prophylaxis treatment. The article outlines the results of a five-year retrospective database review, which determined that 18% of all tetanus prophylaxis treatments delivered in the ED during that period were unnecessary. The author makes some recommendations to improve practice.