住院医师申请人在研究生一年级住院医师面试中对多个迷你面试的认知。

Jennifer Austin Szwak, Shannon Rotolo, Hailey P Soni
{"title":"住院医师申请人在研究生一年级住院医师面试中对多个迷你面试的认知。","authors":"Jennifer Austin Szwak,&nbsp;Shannon Rotolo,&nbsp;Hailey P Soni","doi":"10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Residency interviews offer an opportunity for both candidates and programs to evaluate whether the pairing is a good fit. Multiple mini interviews (MMIs) have been incorporated into interviews for medical training as a way to evaluate non-cognitive abilities. <b>Objectives</b>: To determine how candidates perceived the interview process at our institution, specifically related to the MMIs. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective review evaluated candidates' perceptions of traditional interviews and MMIs through post-interview surveys over a 3-year period. Candidates evaluated the interview activities, time allowed for MMIs, and overall impression of the program during the 2-week period between submitting rank lists and the release of match results. Survey results are reported using descriptive statistics. Candidate perceptions on their ability to showcase skills in different types of interviews was evaluated with chi-square test. <b>Results:</b> The interview day increased the desire to pursue residency at our institution for 88% of candidates. Candidates reported similar ability to showcase skills developed during pharmacy school through the clinical and patient education MMIs compared to traditional interviews; however, they did not feel the collaboration MMI showcased their abilities as well as traditional MMIs. <b>Conclusion:</b> The introduction of MMIs to the residency interview day were perceived positively by most candidates and allowed candidates to showcase abilities in a different manner from traditional interviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":13646,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/75/21550417-13-02-4806.PMC9836745.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Austin Szwak,&nbsp;Shannon Rotolo,&nbsp;Hailey P Soni\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Residency interviews offer an opportunity for both candidates and programs to evaluate whether the pairing is a good fit. Multiple mini interviews (MMIs) have been incorporated into interviews for medical training as a way to evaluate non-cognitive abilities. <b>Objectives</b>: To determine how candidates perceived the interview process at our institution, specifically related to the MMIs. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective review evaluated candidates' perceptions of traditional interviews and MMIs through post-interview surveys over a 3-year period. Candidates evaluated the interview activities, time allowed for MMIs, and overall impression of the program during the 2-week period between submitting rank lists and the release of match results. Survey results are reported using descriptive statistics. Candidate perceptions on their ability to showcase skills in different types of interviews was evaluated with chi-square test. <b>Results:</b> The interview day increased the desire to pursue residency at our institution for 88% of candidates. Candidates reported similar ability to showcase skills developed during pharmacy school through the clinical and patient education MMIs compared to traditional interviews; however, they did not feel the collaboration MMI showcased their abilities as well as traditional MMIs. <b>Conclusion:</b> The introduction of MMIs to the residency interview day were perceived positively by most candidates and allowed candidates to showcase abilities in a different manner from traditional interviews.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/75/21550417-13-02-4806.PMC9836745.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v13i2.4806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实习医生面试为候选人和项目提供了一个机会来评估他们的合作是否合适。多种迷你面试(MMIs)已被纳入医学培训面试,作为评估非认知能力的一种方式。目的:确定候选人如何看待我们机构的面试过程,特别是与mmi相关的面试过程。方法:通过3年的访谈后调查,回顾性评价了候选人对传统访谈和mmi的看法。在提交排名和发布匹配结果之间的两周时间内,候选人评估了面试活动,MMIs允许的时间以及项目的总体印象。使用描述性统计报告调查结果。候选人对自己在不同类型的面试中展示技能的能力的看法用卡方检验进行评估。结果:面试日增加了88%的候选人在我们机构攻读住院医师的愿望。与传统面试相比,候选人报告了通过临床和患者教育mmi展示在药学学校发展的技能的类似能力;然而,他们并不认为合作MMI展示了他们的能力,以及传统的MMI。结论:在住院医师面试日引入mmi被大多数候选人认为是积极的,并且允许候选人以不同于传统面试的方式展示能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Residency Applicant Perceptions of Multiple Mini Interviews in Post-Graduate Year 1 Residency Interviews.

Introduction: Residency interviews offer an opportunity for both candidates and programs to evaluate whether the pairing is a good fit. Multiple mini interviews (MMIs) have been incorporated into interviews for medical training as a way to evaluate non-cognitive abilities. Objectives: To determine how candidates perceived the interview process at our institution, specifically related to the MMIs. Methods: This retrospective review evaluated candidates' perceptions of traditional interviews and MMIs through post-interview surveys over a 3-year period. Candidates evaluated the interview activities, time allowed for MMIs, and overall impression of the program during the 2-week period between submitting rank lists and the release of match results. Survey results are reported using descriptive statistics. Candidate perceptions on their ability to showcase skills in different types of interviews was evaluated with chi-square test. Results: The interview day increased the desire to pursue residency at our institution for 88% of candidates. Candidates reported similar ability to showcase skills developed during pharmacy school through the clinical and patient education MMIs compared to traditional interviews; however, they did not feel the collaboration MMI showcased their abilities as well as traditional MMIs. Conclusion: The introduction of MMIs to the residency interview day were perceived positively by most candidates and allowed candidates to showcase abilities in a different manner from traditional interviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Pharmacy Entrustable Professional Activities Strategies Proposed by Students and Pharmacists for Virtual Experiential Patient Care Practicums In-class Exercises Regarding the Roles of Excipients in a Pharmaceutics Course The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Treating Patients with Escherichia coli Bacteremia in a Small Single Center Community Hospital Development and Pilot Testing of the OTC Coach Software to Support Student Pharmacist Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1