摘髓植物:野生白面卷尾猴(Cebus模仿者)的髓选择性。

IF 2 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY American Journal of Primatology Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.1002/ajp.23549
Allegra N DePasquale, Alice C Poirier, Megan A Mah, Cinthia Villalobos Suarez, Adrian Guadamuz, Saul Cheves Hernandez, Ronald Lopez Navarro, Jeremy D Hogan, Jessica M Rothman, Omer Nevo, Amanda D Melin
{"title":"摘髓植物:野生白面卷尾猴(Cebus模仿者)的髓选择性。","authors":"Allegra N DePasquale,&nbsp;Alice C Poirier,&nbsp;Megan A Mah,&nbsp;Cinthia Villalobos Suarez,&nbsp;Adrian Guadamuz,&nbsp;Saul Cheves Hernandez,&nbsp;Ronald Lopez Navarro,&nbsp;Jeremy D Hogan,&nbsp;Jessica M Rothman,&nbsp;Omer Nevo,&nbsp;Amanda D Melin","doi":"10.1002/ajp.23549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding diet selectivity is a longstanding goal in primate ecology. Deciphering when and why primates consume different resources can provide insights into their nutritional ecology as well as adaptations to food scarcity. Plant pith, the spongy interior of plant stems, is occasionally eaten by primates, but the context is poorly understood. We examine the ecological, mechanical, chemical, and nutritional basis of plant pith selection by a wild, frugivorous-omnivorous primate (Cebus imitator). We test the hypothesis that pith is a fallback food, that is, consumed when fruit is less abundant, and test for differences between plant species from which pith is eaten versus avoided. We collected 3.5 years of capuchin pith consumption data to document dietary species and analyzed \"pith patch visits\" in relation to fruit availability, visits to fruit patches, and climatic seasonality. We analyzed dietary and non-dietary species for relative pith quantity, mechanical hardness, odor composition, and macronutrient concentrations. Capuchins ate pith from 11 of  ~300 plant species common in the dry forest, most commonly Bursera simaruba. We find that pith consumption is not directly related to fruit availability or fruit foraging but occurs most frequently (84% of patch visits) during the months of seasonal transition. Relative to common non-dietary species, dietary pith species have relatively higher pith quantity, have softer outer branches and pith, and contain more terpenoids, a class of bioactive compounds notable for their widespread medicinal properties. Our results suggest that greater pith quantity, lower hardness, and a more complex, terpenoid-rich odor profile contribute to species selectivity; further, as pith is likely to be consistently available throughout the year, the seasonality of pith foraging may point to zoopharmacognosy, as seasonal transitions typically introduce new parasites or pathogens. Our study furthers our understanding of how climatic seasonality impacts primate behavior and sheds new light on food choice by an omnivorous primate.</p>","PeriodicalId":7662,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Primatology","volume":" ","pages":"e23549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Picking pithy plants: Pith selectivity by wild white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus imitator.\",\"authors\":\"Allegra N DePasquale,&nbsp;Alice C Poirier,&nbsp;Megan A Mah,&nbsp;Cinthia Villalobos Suarez,&nbsp;Adrian Guadamuz,&nbsp;Saul Cheves Hernandez,&nbsp;Ronald Lopez Navarro,&nbsp;Jeremy D Hogan,&nbsp;Jessica M Rothman,&nbsp;Omer Nevo,&nbsp;Amanda D Melin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajp.23549\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding diet selectivity is a longstanding goal in primate ecology. Deciphering when and why primates consume different resources can provide insights into their nutritional ecology as well as adaptations to food scarcity. Plant pith, the spongy interior of plant stems, is occasionally eaten by primates, but the context is poorly understood. We examine the ecological, mechanical, chemical, and nutritional basis of plant pith selection by a wild, frugivorous-omnivorous primate (Cebus imitator). We test the hypothesis that pith is a fallback food, that is, consumed when fruit is less abundant, and test for differences between plant species from which pith is eaten versus avoided. We collected 3.5 years of capuchin pith consumption data to document dietary species and analyzed \\\"pith patch visits\\\" in relation to fruit availability, visits to fruit patches, and climatic seasonality. We analyzed dietary and non-dietary species for relative pith quantity, mechanical hardness, odor composition, and macronutrient concentrations. Capuchins ate pith from 11 of  ~300 plant species common in the dry forest, most commonly Bursera simaruba. We find that pith consumption is not directly related to fruit availability or fruit foraging but occurs most frequently (84% of patch visits) during the months of seasonal transition. Relative to common non-dietary species, dietary pith species have relatively higher pith quantity, have softer outer branches and pith, and contain more terpenoids, a class of bioactive compounds notable for their widespread medicinal properties. Our results suggest that greater pith quantity, lower hardness, and a more complex, terpenoid-rich odor profile contribute to species selectivity; further, as pith is likely to be consistently available throughout the year, the seasonality of pith foraging may point to zoopharmacognosy, as seasonal transitions typically introduce new parasites or pathogens. Our study furthers our understanding of how climatic seasonality impacts primate behavior and sheds new light on food choice by an omnivorous primate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e23549\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Primatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23549\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Primatology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解饮食选择性是灵长类动物生态学的长期目标。破译灵长类动物消耗不同资源的时间和原因可以让我们深入了解它们的营养生态以及对食物短缺的适应。植物髓,即植物茎的海绵状内部,偶尔会被灵长类动物吃掉,但人们对其背景知之甚少。我们研究了野生食杂灵长类动物(Cebus imitator)选择植物髓的生态、机械、化学和营养基础。我们检验了果髓是一种后备食物的假设,也就是说,当水果不那么丰富时,人们会食用果髓,并检验了食用与不食用果髓的植物物种之间的差异。我们收集了3.5年的卷尾猴果皮消费数据,记录了饮食种类,并分析了“果皮斑块访问”与水果可得性、果皮斑块访问和气候季节性的关系。我们分析了饲粮和非饲粮品种的相对髓数、机械硬度、气味组成和常量营养素浓度。卷尾猴吃干森林中常见的约300种植物中的11种的髓,最常见的是Bursera simaruba。我们发现,果髓消耗与果实可得性或果实觅食没有直接关系,但在季节转换的几个月里发生得最频繁(占斑块访问的84%)。相对于普通的非食性植物,食性植物具有较高的髓数量,较软的外枝和髓,并且含有更多的萜类化合物,这是一类因其广泛的药用特性而闻名的生物活性化合物。我们的研究结果表明,更大的髓数、更低的硬度和更复杂的、富含萜类化合物的气味特征有助于物种选择性;此外,由于髓可能全年都有,因此髓觅食的季节性可能指向动物药理学,因为季节转变通常会引入新的寄生虫或病原体。我们的研究进一步加深了我们对气候季节性如何影响灵长类动物行为的理解,并为杂食性灵长类动物的食物选择提供了新的线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Picking pithy plants: Pith selectivity by wild white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus imitator.

Understanding diet selectivity is a longstanding goal in primate ecology. Deciphering when and why primates consume different resources can provide insights into their nutritional ecology as well as adaptations to food scarcity. Plant pith, the spongy interior of plant stems, is occasionally eaten by primates, but the context is poorly understood. We examine the ecological, mechanical, chemical, and nutritional basis of plant pith selection by a wild, frugivorous-omnivorous primate (Cebus imitator). We test the hypothesis that pith is a fallback food, that is, consumed when fruit is less abundant, and test for differences between plant species from which pith is eaten versus avoided. We collected 3.5 years of capuchin pith consumption data to document dietary species and analyzed "pith patch visits" in relation to fruit availability, visits to fruit patches, and climatic seasonality. We analyzed dietary and non-dietary species for relative pith quantity, mechanical hardness, odor composition, and macronutrient concentrations. Capuchins ate pith from 11 of  ~300 plant species common in the dry forest, most commonly Bursera simaruba. We find that pith consumption is not directly related to fruit availability or fruit foraging but occurs most frequently (84% of patch visits) during the months of seasonal transition. Relative to common non-dietary species, dietary pith species have relatively higher pith quantity, have softer outer branches and pith, and contain more terpenoids, a class of bioactive compounds notable for their widespread medicinal properties. Our results suggest that greater pith quantity, lower hardness, and a more complex, terpenoid-rich odor profile contribute to species selectivity; further, as pith is likely to be consistently available throughout the year, the seasonality of pith foraging may point to zoopharmacognosy, as seasonal transitions typically introduce new parasites or pathogens. Our study furthers our understanding of how climatic seasonality impacts primate behavior and sheds new light on food choice by an omnivorous primate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
103
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The objective of the American Journal of Primatology is to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and findings among primatologists and to convey our increasing understanding of this order of animals to specialists and interested readers alike. Primatology is an unusual science in that its practitioners work in a wide variety of departments and institutions, live in countries throughout the world, and carry out a vast range of research procedures. Whether we are anthropologists, psychologists, biologists, or medical researchers, whether we live in Japan, Kenya, Brazil, or the United States, whether we conduct naturalistic observations in the field or experiments in the lab, we are united in our goal of better understanding primates. Our studies of nonhuman primates are of interest to scientists in many other disciplines ranging from entomology to sociology.
期刊最新文献
Quantitative Analysis of the Carpal Tunnel and Its Inner Structures in Primates. Detecting a Stalker: The Effect of Body Posture, Gaze Direction, and Camouflage Pattern on Predator Detection. Teeth Baring as a Model to Understand Complex Facial Signals in a Tolerant Macaque Species. Issue Information Stable Isotopes Analysis of Black Lion Tamarins Reveals Increasing Arthropod Consumption When Fruit Productivity Decreases in Forest Fragments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1