Use of recombinant S1 protein with hFc for analysis of SARS-CoV-2 adsorption and evaluation of drugs that inhibit entry into VERO E6 cells

The significant number of deaths and infection caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 has created an urgent demand for effective and readily available drugs for the treatment of COVID-19. However, the requirements for biosafety level 3 (NB-3) laboratories for experiments with the virus has made it very challenging for such research to meet this demand. It is known that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), located on the surface of host cells, serves as the viral receptor for the spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2. This protein is a tetramer subdivided into S1 and S2 regions, with the former containing the receptor-binding domain (RBD). Therefore, drugs that interfere with the interaction between the spike and the receptor (as well as accessory proteins) or suppress their expression could inhibit the entry and spread of SARS-CoV-2 between cells. In this context, we standardized the use of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein with hFc (human Fc) for the analysis of binding in VERO E6 cells by flow cytometry, aiming to provide a new tool for identifying drugs and neutralizing antibodies, thus eliminating the need for NB-3 laboratories. Because minocycline (MCL), nimesulide (NMS), and berberine (BBR) have effects related to the ACE2 receptor, inhibit inflammation, and do not suppress the adaptive immune response (crucial for patient recovery), we investigated whether these drugs prevent the absorption of the spike protein into the host cell. For this purpose, we used VERO E6 cells under control conditions, pre-treated with these drugs and exposed to recombinant SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein with hFC. We found that an exposure time of 30 min and a concentration of 10 μg/mL of spike S1 caused a strong signal detected by flow cytometry, using the secondary anti-hFc antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor 647. Pre-treatment of cells with BBR for 30 min suppressed the signal from spike-positive cells, suggesting that this alkaloid interferes with spike adsorption on ACE2. The pre-incubation of spike protein with BBR did not alter its adsorption and internalization, indicating that BBR does not directly interact with spike protein. The ACE2 inactivation with a specific antibody inhibited spike protein adsorption and internalization. Furthermore, the pharmacological treatments did not alter the expression of ACE2. Exposure to spike protein increased IFNγ levels and the treatments with MCL and NMS were effective in inhibiting this increase. Taken together, we standardized a technique for analyzing the adsorption of SARS-CoV-2 and studying molecules that inhibit this process. Additionally, we demonstrated that BBR blocks spike entry bypre-binding to the host cell,and that the ACE2 receptor inactivation prevents Spike protein adsorption and penetration into cells.