使用三个参数优化早期子痫前期筛查。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.995
Shehla Baqai, Shazia Tufail, Anam Waheed, Qurat Ul Ain Hanif
{"title":"使用三个参数优化早期子痫前期筛查。","authors":"Shehla Baqai,&nbsp;Shazia Tufail,&nbsp;Anam Waheed,&nbsp;Qurat Ul Ain Hanif","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of first-trimester preeclampsia-screening algorithm in predicting preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Combined Military Hospitals (CMH) Lahore, Pakistan, between 1st January and 31st August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data of 100 women of any parity aged 18-35 years at gestational age < 13 weeks based on the last menstrual period (LMP), was analysed. First trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening algorithm for preeclampsia was used entering maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure and uterine pulsatility index only, for risk calculation. Patients were followed up till delivery for the development of preeclampsia and fetomaternal outcomes. Clinical characteristics of women with and without preeclampsia were compared using the Chi-square and independent samples t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 29.29±4.56 years and 60% were nullipara. Seventy-eight patients were placed in the low-risk category and 22 patients were in the high-risk category according to the FMF algorithm. Preeclampsia developed in 13 patients. For a risk cut-off of 1 in 100, the FMF algorithm showed a detection rate of 38% with diagnostic accuracy of 75% and a false positive rate (FPR) of 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the performance of adapted FMF algorithm to predict preeclampsia gestational was low, it was found superior to prediction by maternal risk factors alone. Adjustment for additional factors or ethnicity-specific values may help in further improvement of detection rate.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Blood pressure, Biomarkers, Biological markers, Preeclampsia, Risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising Preeclampsia First-Trimester Screening Using Three Parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Shehla Baqai,&nbsp;Shazia Tufail,&nbsp;Anam Waheed,&nbsp;Qurat Ul Ain Hanif\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the performance of first-trimester preeclampsia-screening algorithm in predicting preeclampsia (PE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Combined Military Hospitals (CMH) Lahore, Pakistan, between 1st January and 31st August 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data of 100 women of any parity aged 18-35 years at gestational age < 13 weeks based on the last menstrual period (LMP), was analysed. First trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening algorithm for preeclampsia was used entering maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure and uterine pulsatility index only, for risk calculation. Patients were followed up till delivery for the development of preeclampsia and fetomaternal outcomes. Clinical characteristics of women with and without preeclampsia were compared using the Chi-square and independent samples t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of patients was 29.29±4.56 years and 60% were nullipara. Seventy-eight patients were placed in the low-risk category and 22 patients were in the high-risk category according to the FMF algorithm. Preeclampsia developed in 13 patients. For a risk cut-off of 1 in 100, the FMF algorithm showed a detection rate of 38% with diagnostic accuracy of 75% and a false positive rate (FPR) of 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the performance of adapted FMF algorithm to predict preeclampsia gestational was low, it was found superior to prediction by maternal risk factors alone. Adjustment for additional factors or ethnicity-specific values may help in further improvement of detection rate.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Blood pressure, Biomarkers, Biological markers, Preeclampsia, Risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.995\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.995","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价早期子痫前期筛查算法对子痫前期(PE)的预测效果。研究设计:观察性研究。研究地点和时间:2022年1月1日至8月31日在巴基斯坦拉合尔联合军事医院妇产科进行。方法:对100例年龄在18-35岁、胎龄< 13周的任意胎次妇女的最后一次月经(LMP)数据进行分析。采用妊娠早期胎儿医学基金会(FMF)子痫前期筛查算法,仅输入母体特征、平均动脉压和子宫搏动指数进行风险计算。随访患者直至分娩,以观察子痫前期的发展和胎儿结局。采用卡方检验和独立样本t检验比较有和无先兆子痫妇女的临床特征。结果:患者平均年龄29.29±4.56岁,60%为无产者。根据FMF算法将78例患者归为低危组,22例患者归为高危组。13例患者出现子痫前期。对于1 / 100的风险截止值,FMF算法的检出率为38%,诊断准确率为75%,假阳性率(FPR)为20%。结论:虽然自适应FMF算法预测妊娠期子痫前期的准确率较低,但优于单纯使用母体危险因素预测。调整其他因素或种族特定值可能有助于进一步提高检出率。关键词:血压,生物标志物,生物标志物,子痫前期,风险评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Optimising Preeclampsia First-Trimester Screening Using Three Parameters.

Objective: To evaluate the performance of first-trimester preeclampsia-screening algorithm in predicting preeclampsia (PE).

Study design: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Combined Military Hospitals (CMH) Lahore, Pakistan, between 1st January and 31st August 2022.

Methodology: Data of 100 women of any parity aged 18-35 years at gestational age < 13 weeks based on the last menstrual period (LMP), was analysed. First trimester Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) screening algorithm for preeclampsia was used entering maternal characteristics, mean arterial pressure and uterine pulsatility index only, for risk calculation. Patients were followed up till delivery for the development of preeclampsia and fetomaternal outcomes. Clinical characteristics of women with and without preeclampsia were compared using the Chi-square and independent samples t-test.

Results: The mean age of patients was 29.29±4.56 years and 60% were nullipara. Seventy-eight patients were placed in the low-risk category and 22 patients were in the high-risk category according to the FMF algorithm. Preeclampsia developed in 13 patients. For a risk cut-off of 1 in 100, the FMF algorithm showed a detection rate of 38% with diagnostic accuracy of 75% and a false positive rate (FPR) of 20%.

Conclusion: Although the performance of adapted FMF algorithm to predict preeclampsia gestational was low, it was found superior to prediction by maternal risk factors alone. Adjustment for additional factors or ethnicity-specific values may help in further improvement of detection rate.

Key words: Blood pressure, Biomarkers, Biological markers, Preeclampsia, Risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
453
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991. Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.
期刊最新文献
Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopia. Efficacy of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Modification in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia. Comparison of Rapid Antigen Detection Test with Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction in Highly Suspected COVID-19 Patients. Cervical Mediastinoscopy as a Diagnostic Tool for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy. Proposing Development of Community-based Physical Activity Park for Elderly Population of Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1