{"title":"卡培他滨在三阴性乳腺癌伴淋巴结转移新辅助化疗后的辅助治疗。","authors":"Irem Oner, Alper Turkel, Cengiz Karacin, Erdogan Seyran, Pinar Kubilay Tolunay Br, Omur Berna Cakmak Oksuzoglu","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of complete pathological response (pCR) on prognosis in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the efficiency of adjuvant capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, between March 2015 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 92 patients with TNBC with enlarged axillary lymph nodes and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were classified as those with and without postoperative pCR and compared in terms of survival. Subsequently, the patients who did not achieve pCR were classified as receiving and not receiving adjuvant capecitabine and were compared for DFS (disease-free survival) and OS (overall survival). Parameters that showed statistical significance were re-evaluated with Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year DFS rate was 84.3% in those who achieved pCR, while it was 55.1% in those who did not (p=0.026). The 5-year OS rate was 82.8% in the pCR arm, while it was 51.0% in the non-pCR arm (p=0.070). The 5-year DFS rate was 66.3% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 40.8% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR=0.40, p=0.031). The 5-year OS rate was 68.9% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 29.6% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR= 0.40, p=0.062). Conclusion: Obtaining pCR following NAC in a locally advanced TNBC is an independent prognostic marker for DFS and OS. In the presence of residual disease, improvement in DFS and OS with adjuvant capecitabine was demonstrated by the real-life data.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":54905,"journal":{"name":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","volume":"33 9","pages":"1012-1018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Capecitabine after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis.\",\"authors\":\"Irem Oner, Alper Turkel, Cengiz Karacin, Erdogan Seyran, Pinar Kubilay Tolunay Br, Omur Berna Cakmak Oksuzoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of complete pathological response (pCR) on prognosis in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the efficiency of adjuvant capecitabine.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, between March 2015 and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study included 92 patients with TNBC with enlarged axillary lymph nodes and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were classified as those with and without postoperative pCR and compared in terms of survival. Subsequently, the patients who did not achieve pCR were classified as receiving and not receiving adjuvant capecitabine and were compared for DFS (disease-free survival) and OS (overall survival). Parameters that showed statistical significance were re-evaluated with Cox regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 5-year DFS rate was 84.3% in those who achieved pCR, while it was 55.1% in those who did not (p=0.026). The 5-year OS rate was 82.8% in the pCR arm, while it was 51.0% in the non-pCR arm (p=0.070). The 5-year DFS rate was 66.3% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 40.8% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR=0.40, p=0.031). The 5-year OS rate was 68.9% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 29.6% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR= 0.40, p=0.062). Conclusion: Obtaining pCR following NAC in a locally advanced TNBC is an independent prognostic marker for DFS and OS. In the presence of residual disease, improvement in DFS and OS with adjuvant capecitabine was demonstrated by the real-life data.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Triple-negative breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"1012-1018\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jcpsp-Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2023.09.1012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adjuvant Capecitabine after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of complete pathological response (pCR) on prognosis in patients with axillary lymph node-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and the efficiency of adjuvant capecitabine.
Study design: Analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: University of Health Sciences, Dr Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, between March 2015 and December 2021.
Methodology: The study included 92 patients with TNBC with enlarged axillary lymph nodes and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The patients were classified as those with and without postoperative pCR and compared in terms of survival. Subsequently, the patients who did not achieve pCR were classified as receiving and not receiving adjuvant capecitabine and were compared for DFS (disease-free survival) and OS (overall survival). Parameters that showed statistical significance were re-evaluated with Cox regression analysis.
Results: The 5-year DFS rate was 84.3% in those who achieved pCR, while it was 55.1% in those who did not (p=0.026). The 5-year OS rate was 82.8% in the pCR arm, while it was 51.0% in the non-pCR arm (p=0.070). The 5-year DFS rate was 66.3% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 40.8% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR=0.40, p=0.031). The 5-year OS rate was 68.9% in adjuvant capecitabine-receiving patients, while it was 29.6% in the non-capecitabine arm (HR= 0.40, p=0.062). Conclusion: Obtaining pCR following NAC in a locally advanced TNBC is an independent prognostic marker for DFS and OS. In the presence of residual disease, improvement in DFS and OS with adjuvant capecitabine was demonstrated by the real-life data.
Key words: Triple-negative breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Survival.
期刊介绍:
Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (JCPSP), is the prestigious, peer reviewed monthly biomedical journal of the country published regularly since 1991.
Established with the primary aim of promotion and dissemination of medical research and contributed by scholars of biomedical sciences from Pakistan and abroad, it carries original research papers, , case reports, review articles, articles on medical education, commentaries, short communication, new technology, editorials and letters to the editor. It covers the core biomedical health science subjects, basic medical sciences and emerging community problems, prepared in accordance with the “Uniform requirements for submission to bio-medical journals” laid down by International Committee of Medical Journals Editors (ICMJE). All publications of JCPSP are peer reviewed by subject specialists from Pakistan and locally and abroad.